Tell me, too,
how someone who sees things as you do — all built into Bayesianism; no need to address whether the problem is different priors or different sources
of information relevant to truth - seeking likelihood ratios vs. a form
of biased
perception that opportunisitcally bends whatever evidence is presented to fit a preconception; no need apparently either for empirical study on any
of this — can straighten out someone who says the key to dispelling
public conflict over
climate change is just to disseminate study findings on scientific consensus.