Sentences with phrase «how radiation transfers»

Well, if it's copy and pasting professors of thermodynamics explaining how radiation transfers in both directions between two bodies, why don't you explain where they go wrong?

Not exact matches

But ANP engineers and management were mired in debate over reactor technologies, how best to transfer nuclear power to a conventional engine, and the best material to shield the crew from radiation.

And the authors acknowledge that they do not yet know how the information would subsequently transfer to the Hawking radiation, a further necessary step.

The question is how much of the energy is transferred by radiation, conduction and convection?

Learning Objective (s): Investigate how heat is transferred by radiation.

Radiative transfer models use fundamental physical equations and observations to translate this increased downward radiation into a radiative forcing, which effectively tells us how much increased energy is reaching the Earth's surface.

The use of Stefan / Boltzmann to estimate how much global temperatures will rise as a result of this, also only looks at the transfer of energy by radiation.

It should be clear from the recent comments on Roy Spencer's latest thread that Jeff Conlon (owner of «The Air Vent» website) was wrong in assuming that microbolometers (infra red thermometers) disproved what Prof Claes Johnson said about how one - way spontaneous radiation can not transfer heat from a cooler source to a warmer target.

What we do get, is real invisible heat from the Sun which comes to us as thermal infrared which in the real world is how heat is transferred by radiation, and we get white light without which we would have no life on Earth because the blue wavelength is essential for photosynthesis.

Now please, explain just how gravity will completely prevent the transfer of blackbody radiation up a distance of 600 miles, or 6000 miles, or 600,000 miles.

describe how incoming solar radiation is reflected, absorbed, and transferred throughout the Earth system;

One particularly thorny aspect of the MJO is determining how much heat is transferred between the ocean and throughout the atmosphere by convection and how much heat is absorbed or emitted in the form of radiation.

How about using real heat transfer equations to explain this rather than back radiation.

They will plug all of this data into a radiative transfer model to predict how much radiation from the rooftops is reflected back into space, or «the top of the atmosphere,» allowing them to calculate the impact to global warming.

Possibly some physical mechanism in the ocean changed - changes in rate of upper and lower ocean turnover, changes in locations of the turnover, changes in ocean currents, changes in the atmosphere affecting how much and where radiation reaches the surface or changing the heat transfer to the ocean, etc..

This is the only mention of «net», of net change, I don't understand how that can apply to «net as transfer of radiation» outside of it relating to the flow of heat energy as above and by breaking the 2nd Law of heat flowing always from hot to cold and never the other way around, naturally spontaneous, that is, without work being done to change it.

If AGW supporters understood that not all radiation is thermal and understood the difference between reflective and absorptive, or understood that the 2nd Law can not be broken in any of its parts, or that ideal gas laws do not describe how CO2 behaves in the atmosphere, they would also see that the methodology behind this «net transfer obeys 2ndLaw» is nonsense.