Sentences with phrase «how rational people»

That's now how rational people analyse things.

Mormonism gives «normal» Christians a good chance to understand how rational people view «normal» Christianity.

That is how us rational people feel when the candidates fight over who loves god more.

I am soooo bothered by this new information that I am struggling to understand how a rational person who is trying to teach her children integrity can conduct herself in such a way.

«At this point, I don't see how a rational person can draw definitive conclusions.»

At this point, I don't see how a rational person can draw definitive conclusions.

They literally can not believe they might be wrong about their future predictions — and can not understand how any rational person could not see the future with the same blinders they wear.

Not exact matches

Erin Lowry, author of Broke Millennial: Stop Scraping By and Get Your Financial Life Together, says, «People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&People's relationship to money is not rational, it's emotional... We need to focus more on the psychological blocks and triggers that stand in people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.&people's ways, instead of just explaining how to budget or the importance of compound interest.»

The smarts - dominated leader is rational, makes decisions based on facts, sets goals, delegates responsibility and knows how to hold people accountable.

We will continue to see over-funding of late - stage venture financings until the bloom comes off the rose and then I predict rational non-VCs will return to their day jobs chasing returns in other corners of the financial world and we people who only know how to do venture will continue doing just that.

First question should always be, it is not just the rational science these people are arguing against, it also the numerous other faiths, many of whom have their own doctrines of how the world started.

how can any rational person dismiss these things?

Do you have any idea at all how absolutely retarded you religious wackos seem to normal intelligent rational thinking people?

The most baffling thing is how religious people could be completely rational about every other thing in their everyday lives; and then take leave of their faculties when it comes to these silly stories.

We would not willingly choose such a person, no matter how rational, as a friend, companion, or guardian for them.

Your reasoning is phenomenally inconsistent» @hippypoet» I am not taking anything on my understanding of the bible» @Chad «hmm, then how are you coming to the conclusion that the people of Jesus» day considered him rational and coherent?

Like before the use of ad hominem fallacies continue to demonstrate how pathetic these people are at rational debate.

I was just thinking about her today, by chance, and her amazing reversion, because my mother read her Jesus books... And I was thinking, damn, it's such crap the way she talked about how she stopped being an atheist because of the historicity of Jesus, no rational person can make that argument, she walking on glass, then BOOM!

As long as people believe that God created Adam (in His own image) and Eve on the 6th day, how can there be a rational discussion?

I like to think of myself as a fairly rational individual, which is why what has and is going on at Arsenal confounds me... little wonder people have gone so far as to suggest that Wenger is actually sabotaging the club... one only needs to look at our starting 11 to stoke the flames of conspiracy... just think of the perceived importance of this game, considering the loss to Stoke, the historically significance of the two teams involved, the controversy that swirled around our two meetings last season, the proximity to the closing of the window and the general disdain being directed towards the manager once again... how is it even possible that you wouldn't come to Anfield with all guns blazing... not a single shot on target, with the back - up keeper in no less... where were the new signings?

They start with the belief that even a tiny baby is a rational person who can learn things, and one thing they can learn is how to sleep through the night.

In what Fortune magazine described as «typical Buffet: rational, original, breaking the mold of how extremely rich people donate money,» the world's second richest man is giving away 85 percent of his wealth, most of it to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Albert Ellis, developer of rational emotive behavior therapy, took this theory further, explaining that how people react to events is determined largely by their view of the events, not the events themselves.

Have doing some thinking as of recently on how current events taking place in a person's life in how certain choices are made of where the present locations are happing of how either straight forward in reasoning of decision making to move forward to even more complex layers of design of reasoning of rational thought to advance on to vast intricate levels of interweaving planing to proceed with life's journey.

And no matter how good of a friend and person I am I am unable to make better decisions without the love and consideration from an objective and rational, hence healthy individuals consideration for my best interest.

Hope to meet someone special here... Lets see what happens... Looking for honest, respectful, kind hearted person... Someone who knows how to be fair, reasonable and rational... They want me to keep writing more here....

While this sounds rational to people who believe in our founding principles that «government which governs least governs best» it raises issues as to precisely how institutions that once caused a nation a risk can now drive student proficiency beyond 40 %.

Most people will never attain their investment goals if they do not have a rational strategy for when and how to buy stocks.

If you believe that people are rational and markets are efficient, this will largely determine your views on gun control (unnecessary), consumer protection laws (caveat emptor), welfare programs (too many unintended consequences), derivatives regulation (let a thousand flowers bloom), whether you should invest in passive index funds or hyperactive hedge funds (index funds only), the causes of financial crises (too much government intervention in housing and mortgage markets), and how the government should or shouldn't respond to them (the primary financial role for government should be producing and verifying information so that it can be incorporated into market prices).

The example was used to show how irrational some clients can be; even when your returns are in the top 1 % of all investment managers out there, some people can still find something to complain about (as an aside, that is why the truly successful mutual fund managers quickly exit the public domain once they have made «enough», and then they tend to go super private by either managing their own money or investing privately on behalf of some particular clients that they know to be rational — when you're worth tens and tens of millions of dollars, you don't need to deal with people that don't truly believe that good value investing often means underperforming the S&P 500 at least one out of every three years).

Larry Swedroe is the author of Wise Investing Made Simple (2007), The Only Guide to a Winning Investment Strategy You'll Ever Need (2005), What Wall Street Doesn't Want You to Know (2000), Rational Investing in Irrational Times — How to Avoid the Costly Mistakes Even Smart People Make Today (2002), and The Successful Investor Today: 14 Simple Truths You Must Know When You Invest (2003), and co-author of The Only Guide to a Winning Bond Strategy You'll Ever Need (2006)(All Affiliate Links).

We did not in those days have 33 years of peer - reviewed academic research showing us how to avoid economic crises by teaching people rational investing strategies.

Behavioural insights recognize how people actually behave versus traditional economic and market theory of people as rational actors.

They say people make decisions on how they feel rather than rational thought.

ps fans have been in the mud long after ps3 realease right along with 360 fans, the 1 year to 7 is laughable I could easily show soooooo much trolling from ps fans all last gen just as easily as you could show some from Xbox fans so just stop the BS, especially when this very site by any rational person would be admittedly skewed positively towards ps, which is fine because maybe that's just how popular the brand is but it also bleeds over to there being way more fanatical, irrational fanboys of the ps type on this site.

It's never, ever the game's fault, and that smacks of intelligent, rational game design from people who understand how to craft a gratifying experience.

The developers did a good job with making the conversations feel realistic given the catastrophic calamity, with discussions on issues such as if it's right to increase prices on critical goods given supply versus demand, how people's rational thinking degrades when faced with chaos, to give a few examples.

In her work she looks at how the cold, rational and «intelligent» logic of technology can create vulnerability and fragility in people.

He talked about how more than 85 percent of the world's people get their daily values and norms from the stories they hear through their religions, so why wouldn't you try to take advantage of that pathway of communication, even though it is by definition not very rational.

A rational person will remember how dry SoCal was in 2014, and how dry it may be again.

How supposedly intelligent people can be taken in by this nonsense is beyond belief, unless of course, rational thinking has flown out of the window, and all that remains is devotion to a green religion.

What I can't understand is how anyone else would consider that person and that thinking to be rational.

Science has shown us what the stars are made of and how the Universe works, but people seem to prefer to believe in things lacking in rational backing, religion and creation «science» come to mind.

When talking to people who are experts in narrow fields, it is remarkable how short their rational framework extends into the world outside their expertise.

I can not seriously believe that rational people can not understand how the greenhouse effect works any basic science readings will fix that issue up and you can avoid the whole climate change science go to a hard physics site.

A rational approach would focus not only on climatology and the political science of protest movements but also on the sciences involved in energy production, the social science of economics, and how the interchange between these affects the health, wealth and lifestyle of people across the planet.

So if it is physically impossible to provide such a lifestyle for everyone, with the alternative being what populations in overshoot always do, i.e. collapsing while destroyng a lot of the carrying capacity in the process, then the only rational thing to do is to figure out how many people exactly we can provide for at a reasonable level of comfort, and do what it takes to get there.

Insurers have been declaiming it too expensive to cover people on coastlines against weather calamity for decades; how is the current state of subsidies on suicidal behavior a solution anyone would call rational?

The rational person must wonder how it can be that a 1 degree variation over a century can be so important in the context of the ten-fold variation that we experience on a continual basis.

One of David Wojick's pet peeves is the facile nature in how people lable behavior as either «rational» or «irrational.»