Sentences with phrase «how ridiculous a claim»

religious people with 0 understanding of any science hide behind «its in the bible» no matter how ridiculous their claim (i.e. noahs ark).

Do you realise how ridiculous your claim is?

Like so many anti-wind power organisations, Wind Watch seems to be willing to publish anything that puts wind farms in a bad light, no matter how ridiculous the claim might be.

When caught out on how ridiculous a claim this was, he tried to pass this off as a joke.

Here is how ridiculous the claims of the life insurance agents who promote the cash value as an investment.

Not exact matches

Their claim about that is that it's ridiculous to say «God did it» as a reason for how it occurred.

Notice how I neither pass judgement one way or the other and believe that the claims went from ridiculous and not worth my time of serious investigation to still be ridiculous but at least worth a further amout of investigation.

And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or argument for / about god doesn't show they make any positive claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.

How do you rationalize this (and all the other ridiculous claims in the holy book) away?

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

If you have done the research you claim you have (and I don't believe it for a moment) you would have found how utterly useless and ridiculous that 2000 year old book is.

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

Claiming the ox gnabry and wilshere haven't worked out is ridiculous, the ox is 21, gnabry is 19 and wilshere is 23, how you could expect any of them to be a success this early is beyond me.

The huge difference between Sony and Microsoft on this one is the fact Microsoft is trying to make claims that it will significantly make the Xbox One so much more powerful, Sony is giving very realistic answers to how it will be used for now, they aren't making any ridiculous claims about their cloud compute tech. . .

It is to my continual amazement that so many arguing for AGW / CAGW have no sense of scale, don't realise how, sorry, ridiculous they appear when they claim the «great warming power» of a insignificant amount of trace gas carbon dioxide and compare it with an «insulating blanket».

, it will be easier to see how ridiculous such claims.

The fact that you don't see the kind of embarassment about the ridiculous surface record that you should from the fact the 70 % of the sites are so poorly chosen you'd expect at least 2 centigrade degrees of error (and the whole claimed effect is only a fraction of a degree), shows how corrupt and disinterested in truth the public discourse is.

I've heard some of the most ridiculous claims by climate change advocates about how we're all going to be dead in a decade or two, how we'll see the oceans rise to cover almost all the land masses and other extreme nonsense.

It is a technique that I have seen contrarians use before on threads — barge in making ridiculous claims, then sane and rational people get frustrated and then you cut and paste their comments out of context and say — see how mean tow «extremists» are.

So the solution to how to lower claims was easy, Protective had to make it a completely ridiculous decision to exercise your conversion option.