Not exact matches
The recent hurricanes presented a rare opportunity for Lasker and Edmunds to study
how corals recover from disasters — an important line of research in a warming world where
rising ocean temperatures are stressing reefs.
The experiment of the Kiel marine biologists shows
how local environmental factors such as eutrophication may amplify the effects of global factors such as
rising temperatures and
ocean acidification.
The system is helping scientists understand
how quickly glaciers and ice sheets will melt, and
how fast
oceans will
rise, as
temperatures increase
During the past years, scientists have found out
how ocean acidification — in some cases combined to other factors such as
rise in
temperatures, eutrophication or loss of oxygen — affects isolated species.
A new study details
how some coral species are actually moving into new territory as their vulnerable cousins continue to decline with
rising ocean temperatures.
They created a model to determine
how temperatures of
ocean waters could change shallow reef systems when sea levels
rise and climate warms in the future.
How does society, as it stands now, not understand that they have locked into the system already a
rise to the high 500's ppm, and, in my humble opinion, the low 600's are NOT out of the question.To me this is just as much of a tragedy if it takes place 250 years from now as it is if it takes only 100 years.In the end, the seventh generation is screwed by a huge loss of fresh water, a huge increase in
temperature, an
ocean that no longer produces even one tenth of its total protein and carboydrate output as it did in the 1800's.
I particularly enjoyed the slides that, when combined (1) provided an overview of hotter and cooler CO2 molecules as it relates to
how they are seen from outer space and from profile — because this will make it easier for me to explain this process to others; (2) walked through the volcanic and solar activity vs assigning importance to CO2 changes — because this another way to help make it clearer, too, but in another way; (3) discussed CO2 induced warming and
ocean rise vs different choices we might make — because this helps point out why every day's delay matters; and (4) showed Figure 1 from William Nordhaus» «Strategies for Control of Carbon Dioxide» and then super-imposed upon that the global mean
temperature in colors showing pre-paper and post-paper periods — because this helps to show just
how far back it was possible to make reasoned projections without the aid of a more nuanced and modern understanding.
And guaranties that the cited above G8 deal is dead on arrival... Not that the deal will change anything, except for UK government which has been fantastic on Carbon reductions, The Senator and acolytes would have trouble explaining the disappearing Arctic
Ocean ice, not that someone is capable of «Hoaxing» vanishing multi year ice, and even further, failing to match their statements with Polar ice disappearing in tandem with world wide
temperatures being flat, not
rising for ten years now, as they like to claim,
how to explain the disappearing ice then??? Those trying to explain a long term cycle, beware!
However their predictions are about much more than just the average near - surface air
temperature, they are mainly focused on
how heat mixes into the
ocean and
how that affects the
rise in surface
temperature as CO2 is doubled over 100 years.
How long will it be before methane emissions reach a critical mass and, with help from the thermal energy of the Arctic
Ocean, create a cascade of rapidly thawing permafrost and
rising temperature?
Clearly the rate at which TOA imbalance diffuses into and through the global
ocean is key to
how much and
how quickly global average surface
temperature will
rise over any given span of time.
Third, note
how the sea surface
temperature anomalies in the Western Pacific (and East Indian
Ocean) continue to
rise as the La Niña event strengthens.
Note, for example,
how the
temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st century was generally flat because an upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the
oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the atmosphere (sea water
temperatures continued to
rise).»
HOW MUCH OF THE
RISE IN GLOBAL
TEMPERATURES OVER THE 20TH CENTURY COULD BE EXPLAINED BY THE GLOBAL
OCEANS INTEGRATING ENSO?
So
how our environmental future plays out now is that as the poles melt, the
ocean heats, and water surface area increases, atmospheric H2O skyrockets and some time later as the
temperature passes through 4 deg C heading for 5 deg C global
temperature rise, the
ocean currents start to stall.
Case in point: you point out
how a CENTURY of global warming is borne out in the atmosphere, the cryosphere, the
ocean temperature, and in sea level
rise ALL YOUR OPPONENT needs to say is that the last 18 years doesn't look like «warming» for the atmosphere above 15,000 feet (which, btw, WHAT atmosphere?)
«The results demonstrate
how rapidly
rising temperatures in the atmosphere can affect
ocean circulation, cutting off oxygen to lower depths and extinguishing most life,» says NCAR scientist Jeffrey Kiehl, the lead author.
How quickly most of the
temperature rise occurs is pretty sensitive to assumptions regarding the deep
ocean and its communication with the mixed layer.
Climate Central gets the story right with its story, «
HOW WARMING WORSENED SANDY»S IMPACTS: Global warming made Hurricane Sandy more destructive than it otherwise would have been, through sea level
rise, warmer
ocean temperatures, and other influences.
Question 1:
How much CO2 goes into the atmosphere when there is a small
temperature rise in the
ocean — enough heat to melt the ice?
How many tens of degrees did the
ocean temperature supposedly
rise?
In addition, measurements of deep
ocean temperature rises, which enable estimates of
how fast heat and carbon dioxide are removed from the atmosphere and transferred to the
ocean depths, imply lower transfer rates than previously estimated.