Not exact matches
As I reflect on the
robust experiences I have had as a U.S. Department of Education Principal Ambassador Fellow (PAF) and continue to have as a PAF alum, I think of
how many lost opportunities I had over the years because of my incomplete
analysis and thinking.
Nationally recognized researchers at Research for Action (RFA) have been studying the early adoption of LDC tools, focusing on teachers» response to and use of the tools in 2010 — 2011, expanding to include an
analysis of the scale - up of the initiative in 2011 — 2012 and, in 2012 — 2013, evaluating the status of the initiative and
how conditions that support
robust implementation are related to scale - up and sustainability of this intensive instructional work.
The lines of evidence and
analysis supporting the mainstream position on climate change are diverse and
robust — embracing a huge body of direct measurements by a variety of methods in a wealth of locations on the Earth's surface and from space, solid understanding of the basic physics governing
how energy flow in the atmosphere interacts with greenhouse gases, insights derived from the reconstruction of causes and consequences of millions of years of natural climatic variations, and the results of computer models that are increasingly capable of reproducing the main features of Earth's climate with and without human influences.
In a more conventional field, in which highly technical papers were published in professional journals rather than Nature or Science, the paper would be read by the few experts, who over the next few years would try to understand what it all means, whether it is really new, what the weaknesses might be, do their own
analyses to see
how robust the results are, and ask if there are conflicting data sets.
Do you think it is interesting that he talks of
how the authors «admitted» «over the weekend» that the 20th century
analysis was not «
robust,» — when the paper itself contains statements about the weak statistical validity of the 20th century projections?
We can debate
how robust Kerry's data are, they are quite new and surely there will be further
analysis of the observed trends — but I think we can say at this stage that Kerry's data directly contradict your conclusion about the small contribution of climatic trends to the damage.
REALTORS ®, investors, developers are turning to a more
robust analysis of demographic and economic patterns to determine
how to improve communities to accommodate specific interests and budgets...