Our future work will assess
how sea ice thickness loss contributes to the large - scale atmospheric circulation (see more).
Not exact matches
New way of measuring
sea ice thickness could help assess
how sea ice is affected by climate change
This is because the «early camp» are missing a major factor, even though most of them don't know it: That factor is that first year
sea ice will continue to grow to
thicknesses of around 1.5 to 2m through the winter, so the key issue in whether September can be virtually
sea -
ice free is
how much
sea ice can be lost between March and September.
I sent some questions to some of the authors of the new study showing
how much the
thickness and total volume of Arctic
sea ice have declined since 2003.
Predicting
sea ice extent is easy if you can mentally calculate wind variations, momentum,
sea currents, multi year
ice compression ratios, tidal synergy with weather patterns, the AO, the temperature of
ice sea water and air,
how cloudy it will be, salinity, pycnocline convection rates,
sea surface to air interface, CO2 exchange,
ice thickness distributions.....
•
How can improved estimates of
sea ice thickness help improve seasonal predictions of
sea ice conditions?
With regard to proxy studies, same basic questions, are these direct or passive correlations, what evidence that tree ring core
thickness depends only on temperature (what about precipitation, cloud cover, volcanic activity,
sea surface temperatue changes,
sea current changes, solar irradiance changes, cloud cover, etc.)
How are these variables accounted for when analysis of
ice cores is completed, or for that matter when computer models, and / or proxy studies are completed.
This SMOS
thickness map reveals
how thin the recently refrozen
sea ice on the Atlantic side still is: