Sentences with phrase «how subatomic»

Though he remained forever ambivalent about it, his most public achievement came in 1965, when he won the Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with Julian Schwinger and Shin» ichiro Tomonaga for their work in quantum electrodynamics, a description of how subatomic particles interact.

Before the Large Hadron Collider goes hunting for sparticles, it will first test the boundaries of the standard model of particle physics, the reigning theory of how subatomic particles behave (see «Catch Me if You Can» by Karen Wright, Discover, July 2005).

It paints a compelling picture of how the subatomic world works, but we do not yet know if this picture is just part of a larger canvas.

It is a very real aspect of how the subatomic world works, and it has been experimentally confirmed many times over.

After the war, his Feynman diagrams — for which he shared the ’65 Nobel Prize in Physics — became the standard way to show how subatomic particles interact.

Not exact matches

When women routinely win Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry or medicine, when a woman becomes a world chess champion, when a woman conceives and develops a brand new computer chip that represents a significant advancement over quad cores, when a woman invents warp drive or phasers, when a woman solves an «insolvable» math problem, when a woman, while working with the Large Hadron Collider, discovers the now - hypothetical Higgs Boson to be an actual scalar subatomic particle, when a woman figures out how to pinpoint the exact location of an electron at any point in time, when a woman working for Merck or Pfizer develops a remedy for Alzheimer's disease, when a woman's baseball team can defeat the New York Yankees, when a woman can bench press six hundred pounds, run the 100 meter dash in under nine seconds or set a world record in the high jump, then the fairer sex will have made an advance or contribution unlike any it has made before.

How do subatomic whatever - they - are acquire color and solidity and identity as a chair?

Nevertheless, process thinkers in general propose that anything actual at all — subatomic events, amoebic experience, human experience — has some capacity for novelty, at no matter how rudimentary, even negligible a level.

Scientists since the early 20th century have struggled with the question of how one set of physical laws governing objects above a certain size can co-exist alongside a different set of laws governing the atomic and subatomic scale.

According to the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics (although «orthodox» seems an odd description for such a radical world view), subatomic entities such as electrons or photons are either waves or particles — depending on how the physicist chooses to observe them.

Devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1925, it describes subatomic particles and how they may display wavelike properties such as interference.

Two giants of 20th century physics have recently offered 21st century views on how to interpret the quantum math that requires the subatomic world to be so weird.

This video shows how the contraption accelerates and slams together subatomic particles, and what comes out of the collision.

A breed of subatomic particle made from nothing has huge implications for technology — and shows how tenuous reality itself is

The answers sought by particle physicists are essential for understanding the subatomic building blocks of matter, and how the Universe began.

Such fuzziness brings us back to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which describes how measuring the location of a subatomic particle inherently blurs its momentum and vice versa.

«In this experiment, the polarization gives scientists a unique way to understand hard - to - catch details of how the «color» charges of quarks and gluons affect their microcosmic interactions,» explained Brookhaven physicist Elke Aschenauer, a member of the scientific collaboration using RHIC's STAR detector to analyze the subatomic smashups.

How «real» are entities such as quarks, and to what extent should they be regarded simply as artificial models and analogies to help us try to understand the incomprehensible subatomic world?

According to the big bang theory, one of the main contenders vying to explain how the universe came to be, all the matter in the cosmos — all of space itself — existed in a form smaller than a subatomic particle.

Currently, the universe we live in obeys two seemingly incompatible laws — quantum mechanics, which governs the behavior of subatomic particles; and relativity, which describes how clumps of atoms, such as humans, stars and galaxies, behave.

Astronomers can only theorize about how density fluctuations in a sea of subatomic particles could have formed the great variety of galaxy shapes and sizes that make up the universe as we see it today.

The discovery of the Higgs boson represents the final piece of the puzzle in the Standard Model of particle physics, a theory that describes how three of the four fundamental forces — electromagnetic, weak and strong nuclear forces — interact at the subatomic level (but does not include gravity).

subAtomic also happens to be a short game with simple puzzles, simple sounds and simple graphics that emphatically showcases just how funny, refreshing and elegant such an unassuming offering can be.

Game Pick: «subAtomic» (Murray Lewis & David Blake, freeware) «subAtomic happens to be a short game with simple puzzles, simple sounds and simple graphics that emphatically showcases just how funny, refreshing and elegant such an unassuming offering can be.»

Perhaps the programmer wants to find the underlying nature of reality but can not solve the hardest problem of all: the conundrum at the heart of quantum mechanics, how can a subatomic particle be both a particle and a wave?