Unfortunately, understanding
how teacher pay works is a daunting task, and the process has a language all its own that most outsiders are unaware of.
In our next post in this series, we'll look at
how teacher pay has changed over the past several years.
In our next post in this series, we'll look at
how teacher pay stacks up to other comparable professions.
The national study doesn't include a state - by - state analysis, but it does include details on
how teacher pay factors into attrition rates, specifically:
As the state budget is finalized, some critics say they're skeptical of
how the teacher pay raises will pan out.
How the teacher pay raise formula could worsen Seattle's inequity In this oped Marguerite Roza describes one critical issue underlying the fall 2015 Seattle Public Schools teachers» strike that neither the Seattle School District nor the Seattle Education Association, the teachers» union, took on: the built - in inequities across schools created...
I've watched the leaders of our teachers» unions talking about
how teacher pay is poor and teacher working conditions are poor and everything's poor and everyone is doing badly, but that they are going to fix it.
Not exact matches
Next class,
pay attention to
how much you are looking in the mirror and at the
teacher, because neither of those things will help YOU get the most out of your hour.
I can't remember the exact verse but it talks about the body is given some to be
teachers some to be healers etc. so
how come only one function within the body gets
paid for their gifting?
What a shame... and standardized testing, what a revolting way to judge the merit of a school system (more specifically ~ an individual educator) I was horrified to find out from a family friend who was a Special Education
teacher a few years ago (who is now my sons 7th grade, general Ed., Language Arts
teacher), that the BOE
pays for the special Ed
teachers to go to a 3 day long In Service, instructing them
how to get their Spec.
In rejecting an arbitrator's report Wednesday that recommended a healthy
pay hike, the Chicago
Teachers Union indicated it will push for a deal that gives members greater job security and a say in
how the longer school day plays out next year.
One of the
teachers is a friend, so I know
how little they get
paid, and only the
teacher can get any benefits at all — there is no family package.
Pay attention to
how you speak in front of your kids about their school district and
teachers, too.
«The question that we should ask is
how can you inherit a budget deficit of 9.3 % of GDP, proceed to reduce taxes, bring down inflation, bring down interest rates, increase economic growth (from 3.6 % to 7.9 %), increase your international reserves, maintain relative exchange rate stability, reduce the debt to GDP ratio and the rate of debt accumulation,
pay almost half of arrears inherited, stay current on obligations to statutory funds, restore
teacher and nursing training allowances, double the capitation grant, implement free senior high school education and yet still be able to reduce the fiscal deficit from 9.3 % to an estimated 5.6 % of GDP?
Claire Austin, a nurse rather than a
teacher (though the SNP leader also got a hard time from them), challenged her over nurses»
pay rises,
how «demoralising» it was to work in NHS Scotland and the claim she had made use of food banks.
What are we doing about failing schools,
how do we
pay teachers and what we are
paying for are questions that are implicitly raised in every budget.
A real - time electronic poll of members attending the Conference found that: 55 % said that national standards for supply agencies would most help to secure better employment conditions for supply
teachers; 83 % said supply agencies do not fully disclose all fees and charges they make for their services; 61 % said supply agencies do not act to ensure their safety, health and wellbeing at work; Nearly a quarter (24 %) said their supply agency does not make them fully aware of
how much they will be
paid for each assignment and the same number said they were not
paid promptly and accurately by their agency; A third said their agency did not make them fully aware of the type of work they were expected to undertake; 15 % said that their supply agency prevents them from seeking work from other sources; 65 % said supply agencies do not respect and develop their professional skills; Nearly a third (32 %) said they would not recommend their main supply agency to other
teachers.
Hard to see
how school districts can come anywhere close to the cap without cannibalistic -
teacher reduction — cut the young
teachers to
pay for the benefits for the more senior.
In Part 1 of his weekly «Mondays with the Mayor» interview on NY1, Mayor de Blasio talks to Errol Louis about a proposal on the Upper West Side to desegregate middle schools, and why he is at odds with the
teacher's union over
how to give
teachers paid time off for parental leave.
Next class,
pay attention to
how much you are looking in the mirror and at the
teacher, because neither of those things will help YOU get the most out of your hour.
In this episode of the podcast, she talks with Paul Peterson about
how the IMPACT system promotes
teacher retention and performance through
pay.
A new, in - depth report takes a look at
how states spend education money and finds that the most cost - effective ways of increasing student achievement are by reducing pupil -
teacher ratios, providing more prekindergarten programs, and providing
teachers with discretionary classroom resources — not by raising
teacher pay.
The administrators have to quit hiding behind the «it's all the unions» fault» slogan and figure out
how to evaluate
teachers and to use that information in
pay and retention decisions.
Tracking progress is just as important for students as it is for
teachers, seeing
how they're building knowledge shows children that the work they're doing is
paying off.
Beyond inflammatory rhetoric about
teacher unions,
pay - for - performance, and other hot - button school policies, we need to be thoughtful about
how our decisions affect
teachers — and, ultimately, our children.
If you disagree, answer these questions for me:
How long has
teacher pay been a problem?
• 57 % of the public supports basing
teacher salaries in part «on
how much their students learn,» while just 31 % opposes performance
pay.
In «Scrap the Sacrosanct Salary Schedule,» Jacob Vigdor looks at
how the current system of
teacher pay offers too few rewards for younger
teachers.
The grant money was also used for professional development;
teachers were
paid to spend Saturdays learning
how to successfully integrate technology into the curriculum.
As the schools learned
how to interpret this diagnostic information, many began using the system to individualize instruction, assess
teachers, and
pay for performance.
In other words, their findings suggest schools can cut compensation by as much as a third without harm, though in their current essay they only talk about
how «moderate»
pay reductions would not push the average
teacher below his or her market - compensation level.
«From the perspective of a
teacher's union,» says Weissmann, «it's easy to see
how this would make the [merit
pay] concept even more unpalatable — who wants to subject themselves to the stress of seeing their bonus stripped away?»
In his eight years as Minnesota's governor, Tim Pawlenty's «push against the
teachers union grew stronger,» Sherry writes, and he called for tying
teacher pay to performance, bringing up the state's standards, and urging state lawmakers to authorize the use of a transparent growth model to see
how well schools are really doing to improve student achievement.
In education we tend to talk about pieces of a school or district (
teacher quality, technology, early - childhood education, etc.) and
pay too little attention to what makes schools coherent and productive organizations and
how government can promote or detract from those attributes.
ProComp is not an educational «silver bullet» or even a comprehensive solution to the unsolved problem of
how to build a new form of
teachers»
pay.
It's impossible to picture
how the United States will radically upgrade the quality of its three - million - member K - 12
teacher cadre, attract more able people to enter and stick with this field, ensure needy kids» access to the best instructors, or span the curriculum with people who really know their subjects as long as this archaic, civil - service
pay system persists.
The real question isn't whether we should
pay all
teachers more or less; it's
how to
pay the right
teachers more, in a way that serves students and maximizes the bang we get for the educational buck.
Public Impact, with help from
teachers and others, will soon begin releasing designs that clarify
how to make these changes in schools, within budget, and
pay excellent
teachers more for the additional children they reach.
A team of
teachers and administrators at each school decides
how to reallocate money to fund
pay supplements permanently, in contrast to temporarily grant - funded programs.
In this episode, Chad Aldeman of Bellwether Education Partners joins Marty West to discuss the increasing cost of
teacher benefits,
how this affects
teacher take - home
pay, and what
teachers gain and lose under the current system.
In essence, TAP provides a detailed plan for
how teachers can be effective in the classroom, furnishes a formula to evaluate all
teachers, and links positive evaluations along with achievement - growth measures to bonus
pay.
How to explain such relentless reductions in class size, especially when they seem to be at the expense of
teacher pay?
But instead «of allowing
teachers unions to seize the initiative, state lawmakers need an affirmative agenda for
how to fix
teacher pay.»
The
teacher wonders
how this meeting will impact his overall evaluation, incentive
pay, and future prospects.
The book first recounts the technical challenges in reforming
teacher pay and the reasons for
teacher resistance, then
how trial and error, tough negotiation, and assiduous efforts to win hearts and minds convinced
teachers to endorse the plan in 2004.
When they insist that ideas like school choice, performance
pay, and
teacher evaluations based on value - added measures will themselves boost student achievement, would - be reformers stifle creativity, encourage their allies to lock elbows and march forward rather than engage in useful debate and reflection, turn every reform proposal into an us - against - them steel - cage match, and push researchers into the awkward position of studying whether reforms «work» rather than when, why, and
how they make it easier to improve schooling.
For
teachers who find such sentiment hard to fathom, they should ask themselves
how they'd feel if first responders walked off the job (after being promised a reasonable
pay bump) because they objected to their state's capital gains tax rate.
And for those who say we can't afford to
pay teachers a decent wage, I ask them to consider
how much money we spend on national defense each year and the size of salaries and bonuses that are
paid each year to the many thousands who work on Wall Street.
Otherwise, the new system gives carte blanche for schools to base
pay decisions on
how much money is available, whether a
teacher's face fits, or on something as simple as if they volunteer to drive the school minibus at weekends.
How widespread is
teacher opposition to rigorous
teacher evaluations, school accountability,
teacher pension reform, merit
pay, charter schools, school vouchers, and other items on the reform agenda?