Not exact matches
Our concern in this
study is with the spiritual vision behind modernity and the nature of the critique which primal vision brings to it and to evaluate the same from a Christian theological view - point and to see
how the spiritual vision of post-modern society may incorporate what is
valid in it.
This great psychological / science community can never and has never conducted a
valid study to show
how one chooses to act on their orientation is not impacted by their environment.
I've seen one
study that refutes this notion but I'm not sure
how valid it is.
«A
study which relies on people remembering what products they used and
how they used them is not reliable or
valid,» says the spokeswoman.
If you can present some
valid studies showing
how a raw food diet is healthier compared to a conventional whole food plant based diet then please do so.
My firm recently completed a research
study to see
how valid this supposed ineptness of active managers is.
An interesting blog post would be to investigate
how many
valid (or not)
studies have been compromised by the obligatory global warming (climate change) inclusion in order to get published.
Personally, I prefer to read the inverse
studies involved, engage my brain and make an intelligent assessment of
how capable they are of providing a
valid estimate of aerosol forcing.
@Nic Lewis: «Personally, I prefer to read the inverse
studies involved, engage my brain and make an intelligent assessment of
how capable they are of providing a
valid estimate of aerosol forcing.»
I wonder
how many
studies directly (as in in a scientifically
valid manner) address # 2 as opposed to assuming it from theory.