Sentences with phrase «how valid this argument»

I just don't see how a valid argument can be made that no one should breed beagles when pits are dieing in shelters.

Not exact matches

@NAH, can rebut each of Colin's points in a reasonable manner, specifically let me call out two (both sort of related)-- the Christianity refers to only 600 years of history, and only refers to a small geography (not even the entire earth)-- why «leap of faith» argument is valid for Christianity and not for other independent faiths, which have many contradictory beliefs compared to Christianity, and if they are equally valid, how can they all be equally valid

He creates spaces for other... and players like asensio, modric and even kova can do wonders if there is space... Like I said, all of these arguments are valid or invalid until Madrid gets a new striker and see how it does pan out in Zidanes system..

We can win the league and Wenger will most likely say that we could of done more so for me that argument is not valid, we can always do more because no matter how good we are, we can always become better.

Drawing from his new book Proving History: Bayes's Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus (Prometheus, 2012), Dr. Carrier will explain what Bayes» Theorem is (in terms anyone can understand), how it underlies all valid historical methods even when we don't realize it, and why knowing this can improve historical reasoning and argument in all fields of history.

There are some people claiming that is an added benefit of the barbell variation since it transforms the movement into a «functional» one, just because it stimulates the posterior chain muscles, although it's hard to see how this can become a valid argument.

While there may be very valid arguments and concerns over how shifting the balance of power back to one major retailer can impact the entire publishing industry, the fact remains: price fixing isn't allowed because it also shifts the balance of power back to one seller.

Not that it was any more valid an argument then than it is now, but it just shows how tiresome the climate denialist crowd can be.

It's always amusing to read in the «skept - o - sphere,» the thousands and thousands and thousands of comments on the subject of whether there is a «consensus» and even more interestingly, precisely how big that «consensus» is, from people who say that the noting the existence of a «consensus» is not only a fallacious argument, but that in fact noting that there is a «consensus» is antithetical to the valid practice of science.

This looks like more of his fair and balanced posing — if someone offers argument directed at one side, Danny rushes in to show how it is valid against the other as well, thus confirming once again he is the non-partisan arbitrator we all secretly wish for.

This looks like more of his fair and balanced posing — if someone offers argument directed at one side, Danny rushes in to show how it is valid against the other as well, -LSB-...]

You make this argument (which is hopefully fairly obviously not even logically valid, let alone unsupported by any actual physics), and attempt to «support» it by means of waving your hands about how gravity has to do work and the work has to turn into heat without considering what happens to all that heat when gravity stops doing work because the atmosphere achieves a static force profile such that.

No matter how you slice it, there is no valid argument in this framework as to why we should cut CO2 emissions.

How did someone who claims a general school education not learn the difference between an unscientific, invalid personal attack and a valid argument about the substance of the matter?

But regardless of how scientists act, they should all advance their arguments through evidence and valid scientific interpretations.

The aforementioned «right to be heard» arguments raise some valid questions with regard to how ODR is used.

With the implications of forks and the journey of cryptocurrency itself still in the early days, there are mixed opinions within the fraternity as to how valid any for or against argument can be.