Sentences with phrase «how values of players»

Not exact matches

Emin Leydier general manager Yves Herbaut added, «We are proud of joining a renowned industrial player, who shares our values of social dialogue, know - how and proximity to customers.

How much did your actual production on the court translate into percentage contribution to wins (Win Shares), the net value of points scored while you were on the floor (Box Plus Minus), and the value that your individual game added relative to a «replacement level» player (VORP)?

Wenger doesn't have final say on transfers... Gazidis would have a heart attack if that was the case, Gazidis himself has made a joke about how Wenger doesn't know the price of a player but only the value he would add to the team.

Player salaries are a reflection of their value on the market, which is influenced by salary cap (how much capital teams can spend on players), which is, in turn, influenced by NFL profits as a whole, which is influenced by ticket revenue, advertising, merchandise, TV contracts, etc..

Goodell's memorandum also promised support and training to athletes to help prevent future cases of domestic violence, though the NFLPA has a host of concerns with the program — chiefly, that the program is too concerned with how players may be punished if they commit an act domestic violence, rather than fostering values to stop domestic violence from occurring in the first place.

«The price of a player is down to four ingredients; one is the talent, two is his age, three is how much you expect him to improve your team, and four is his resale value.

Now look how things are sharping up, change of approach to the game, players showing more spirit and giving us money for value.

It's because we are upfront always speaking bad about our players an our abilities; how can som1 come and buy up to estimated that value of a player when we devalue him ourself?

I guess that begs the question — how much better would Pache have to be on defense for him to cancel out Hamilton's edge in base running to be an equal value player in terms of WAR?

its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d point of being in d «top 10 financially rich clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll buy d odd 30m player but is it enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to buy 2 top 30m signings....

If he is interested like some of our targets both in ST & DM position which would've & could still be an upgrade over what we have you don't take your time you go for it before they change there mind or in the case of Pedro with Man U another team comes and simply lay down $ $ $ without thinking too much (it is also a way to show how much you need & value the player.

How are Arsenal going to make a bidding for a player whose value on the field of play will be gradually declining by the reason of his aging as he becomes a spent force in 3 years time when he clocked 30.

«The club have made it quite clear how much they value the players we've got and we're in a good position cash-wise because we haven't spent a lot of money.»

Wengers speech at the AGM consisted of money in the game and how things are different now with a pinch of the values of our club, it's classic Wenger just like blaming refs and diving players, a pure deflection tactic.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Check out this quote «The price of a player is down to four ingredients; one is the talent, two is his age, three is how much you expect him to improve your team, and four is his resale value».

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» club

Many fans will feel that # 92m is beyond the player's value but with Alexis Sanchez seemingly nearing the end of his Arsenal days, the question Wenger will ask is how much is the space that he may leave worth?

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

Last week, we posted our first DFS column of the year which examined the recent ruling by the Nevada Gaming Control Board, and analyzed how line movement was affecting player value on DraftKings.

Some have suggested that he should not go to the Euro's with England this summer because of his lack of playing time but the idea that Hodgson would even think about choosing a player with just over 70 minutes of playing time this season, goes to show just how valued Jack's quality is for both club and country.

So, here, Logan sort of got caught in the middle, a player who definitely had value but how much was that value worth?

The question is just how much a team values him as that kind of player.

The right - back was recently crowned Player's Player of the Year by teammates and colleagues — which goes on to show how highly the 31 - year old is valued in the dressing room.

A loan system is a good way to judge the value of a player and how much he can develop; or how much a player can give when he is towards the end of his career.

Players are not necessarily beloved because of the cogent contributions that they make to teams; they are often valued based on how they make fans feel.

We want good and matured players at the emirates and not some small boys who are not even of any value or else how can anyone explain a player at 20 years leaving a club on free transfer?

Van Gaal had always told fans and reporters not to obsess over formations; that the values of his philosophy ran deeper than the numerical notation of how many players fell into defence, midfield, attack and the slots between those lines.

Basically, you predict how a player's going to perform over any given space of time and, if you think his value will rise, you can invest your own cash.

However, identifying who offers the best value, which players you may have overlooked and how players may perform for their new clubs, are some of the factors that come into play when picking your initial side.

«All the managers know the value of this kind of player — maybe the media don't talk too much about them or how important they are,» the City boss added.

It's reasonable to assume that those numbers are a pretty close representation of the players» actual values, but let's have a closer look at their numbers and see for ourselves how valuable each player is.

Coach of the Year nominations are reviewed for how well the nominee exemplifies the NYSCA Coaches Code of Ethics, founded on values like placing the well - being of their players ahead of personal intentions and goals, being a role model of good sportsmanship and providing a safe playing situation for their players, among many other key areas.

It's amusing enough, and the players provide guaranteed entertainment value (if only out of curiosity to see how they'll measure up).

While the specifics of everything here won't be identical in the Animal Crossing mobile game, we're able to get a general sense of what to expect in terms of both how currency is distributed (about half and half between activity in the game or daily bonuses), the amount of value that a 100 % free player can receive every month (about $ 15 US dollars or so), and what a player can expect to pay in either time or real - world money for in - game items.

Obviously in a very small company or private sale this becomes much harder / impossible as it can't be floated in any meaningful way, but versions of this wisdom of crowd type effect can be done by approaching a few outside parties and asking them what they would pay / how they would value it (similar to asking a few estate agents for valuations of a house before a private sale) to at least get some benchmark estimates of what similar private players might pay.

«With Deniable Ops, it will be interesting to see how much replay value players get out of it!»

This I would argue is true but this is also where people happen to not realize their own complaints, how can you continue to love Mario Party 2 or 3 but not like 6 or 7, they are basically the same game and each offers the same amount of value to their players, you just need to stop trying to dislike them.

Transparency is essential but even when the player is aware of how their data may be used, the terms of how their data is valued (what revenue will be generated from it) is almost never shared, meaning it is essentially impossible for them to give informed consent to this type of arrangement.

With Steam's trading card system as sort of the evolution of achievements, it will be interesting to see how and if they expand on the system to provide more value to players.

I do like how the game will only ever make you wait for about ninety seconds before giving you a match against bots, meaning you can still gain the exp you don't in skirmish games without having to wait ages for players, its great for the types of people that aren't big on multiplayer, each vehicle has unlockable skins, voice lines, tombstones to mark deaths and emotes for bragging rights, the game also features a leveling system with loot boxes for unlockable gear and titles at each level up, meaning there are always rewards for even the casual player to earn which is great for replay value.

-- Customizing System which allows you to change how your team look and improve your team \'s skills — The funny plays of players like slapstick comedy — Half - turn rule suitable for mobile devices — Funny soccer moments: Drunks, dogs, bicycle riders and etc. on soccer fields — 10 leagues and over 60 different teams — Replay value: Contract extension system — Various soccer fields and weather effects

While the specifics of everything here won't be identical in the Animal Crossing mobile game, we're able to get a general sense of what to expect in terms of both how currency is distributed (about half and half between activity in the game or daily bonuses), the amount of value that a 100 % free player can receive every month (about $ 15 US dollars or so), and what a player can expect to pay in either time or real - world money for in - game items.

It keeps players thinking about their trips out of the village and how to get the greatest value from them.

It turns out that easily measured things like the ability to run fast are not the useful statistics to use when assessing whether to recruit a player and how much to pay, but: «As bad as they may have been, the statistics used to evaluate baseball players were probably far more accurate than anything used to measure the value of people who didn't play baseball for a living.»

All the different players in the legal industry may not always agree, but the dialogues that are happening now are rich and need to continue, to help everyone understand how we can build on the best values of the profession and innovate our services to meet the demands of justice consumers today.

You're ready to share all of your work - related accomplishments, how you're an initiator and go - getter, and how much of a team player you are, which will all add value to the job you're interviewing for.

Turns out that while employers may want a team player, on your resume they're looking for signs of being an individual contributor and how you personally add value and ROI.