Sentences with phrase «how well claims»

When you are in the market for California homeowners insurance you should consider the premium you will have to pay, the level of service the insurance company can and will provide and how well claims are handled.

The most important areas for most people are how well claims are handled and how likely claims are to be paid.

The investigator will also meet with Davis and fellow former members of the Saintsations to see how well their claims hold up against questioning.

Anytime there is oil involved, no matter how good it claims to be (even the Clinique one is a s *** show) I ALWAYS get an oily residue in my eye * with or without contacts on, and it just ruins my day.

Discovering how well a claim is handled by a particular company can be influential when you are selecting a company to conduct business with.

Not exact matches

As for her assertion that newcomers should find the process rewarding enough to brave an intimidating tableau of wires and capacitors and diodes, well, just think about how some people claim to love assembling IKEA furniture: the careful laying out of the parts, painstaking examination of instructions, a few false starts and, ultimately, the satisfaction of things slotting into place as the final product takes shape.

During the VR lesson, which takes roughly 15 minutes, the claims adjusters are scored by how well they discover problems and whether they appropriately follow up like notifying a plumber.

Rather than assuming suppliers are telling the truth or being ambivalent over the difficulty of verifying claims, product producers and suppliers would do well to acknowledge just how limited their quality - control reach really is.

That's how Lee solved his ship - securing problem, and that, claims Lee, is how all good managers solve the toughest challenges.

That's the contention of Carson Tate, author of Work Simply, who claims to have pinned down four distinct productivity styles along with ideas on how each type of worker can best contribute to his or her team.

If aboriginal people in this region are ever to progress at the rate expected by politicians and others it is essential that they have the ability to be both economocally and culturally «independent» of those who claim to know best how to address the issues but really have no prolonged on the ground experience.

Portis won't reveal exactly how much he lost through these alleged misdeeds, but among the assets in his 2015 bankruptcy filings he included a $ 1 million note from Ahmed's firm as well as «potential» claims of $ 2 million and $ 8 million against Brahmbhatt's and Rubin's firms, respectively.

What Employees Say: «Pay was pretty good and they taught you how to process and adjust medical claims.

As a renter you should know how to file a claim for different events, as well as keep inventory of all the things you own.

Andrew Graham, CEO of Borrowell, said he has no idea how Lending Loop is doing what it claims to be doing, but wished Pastoll and his team well.

He was also «responsible» for other trading products as well as seminars and the German banker secret site where he «teaches normal traders how to make (what he claims) extraordinary profits».

As Singapore claims to be the «better Switzerland» for banking, finews.asia editor - in - chief Claude Baumann looks at how Swiss banks mistakenly assumed they are irreplaceable, in an essay for...

Before you claim, take the time to think about how to work this important source of income into your overall financial plan, so you can retire well.

Mr. Anglin has a habit of saying what he thinks — which, despite the claims of the Wildrose Party and other right - wing Western Canadian political groups that's how elected officials should act, doesn't really go over that well in the real world of politics.

Never mind that this is the same Conservative «plan» that contributed to Canada experiencing the only recession among major industrial economies so far this year. Claiming «victory» because GDP is growing again after a recession, is a bit like commenting on how good it feels to stop beating your head against the wall. Before popping any champagne, we'd better pause to ask: why were we beating our heads against the wall in the first place?

Claim: Charts accompanying the premier's infomercial show how British Columbians are faring better when it comes to paying taxes.

How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?

This is a video that shows really well how to be non-objective, subjective, and make unsupported claims while appearing to be intelligent, smart, and clear.

A better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't need religion to be a moral person, and then demonstrate how some of the people that claim to be a beacon for religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid of morality.

Better to look to the other claims of Mormonism and how these may affect a president's decisions, and how election of a Mormon validates a religion that many suspect.

Especially considering how much pain can be perpetrated in the name of claiming that better place after you die.

@ total non sense Perhaps we're splitting hairs here, but I was trying to be kind by implying that rather than treating religiosity as a mental disability, for which the supposedly clinically sick can receive insurance benefits and evade personal actionable responsibility by claiming illness, it would be better to treat religiosity as a societal functional disorder which can be addressed through better education and a perceptional shift towards accepting scientific explanations for how the world works rather than relying on literal interpretations of ancient bronze age mythologies and their many derivations since.

- how you can claim it's a «morally good choice» to elect a president who wants to bring back waterboarding and other forms of torture, who wants to target the families of terrorists because «that's what they do to us,» and who admires the tactics of Vladimir Putin and Saddam Hussein

I was made out to be a liar because how could this great leader, well liked speaker ever do what I claim (ed).

Religion is a corporate and political structure bent on destroying things that help the most vulnerable in society with no guarantee of filling the void.They claim they can do it better, but since you can not make people be charitable and so many megachurches are focused on the bottom line, I don't see how this is going to pain out.

Also, exploration of how best to characterize particular Christian congregations» construals of the Christian thing will have to rest in part on the results of exploration of whether their practices involve truth claims and, if so, whether they are true and under what circumstances.

How can the writer believe that he and his fellow evangelicals should worry less about whether gays can marry or not and more about keeping their own traditional marriage in tact — 33 % divorce rate — yet claim Santorum shows well - placed compassion?

No matter how much good the religion of Islam claims to uphold, there are some very dark chapters that MANY people follow.

We do well to see the relevance of the denial of an atomized self for an environmentalist like Callicott and then see how Buddhism supports and enriches his claim.

According to James Juhnke, this engagement is good for both sides: Mennonites are forced to consider how nonviolence relates to issues of justice and how it can be applied in terms of public policy, while the broader church must take seriously «our claims that peace is central to the gospel.»

It may seem somewhat trite to invoke the freedom of creation as part of the works and ends of divine love, or to argue that the highest good of the creature — divinizing union with God in love — requires a realm of «secondary causality» in which the rational wills of God's creatures are at liberty; nonetheless, whether the traditional explanations of how sin and death have been set loose in the world satisfy one or not, they certainly render the claim that an omnipotent and good God would never allow unjust suffering simply vacuous.

At best philosophers can express our hopes; they have no claim on the «truth» nor can they tell us how things really are.

Evidence that Demands a Verdict not only provides a good basis for helping us know how we can trust that the Bible we have today is the Bible that was written by the original authors, but also shows how we can trust the historical claims of the Bible.

Max Weber saw how the claims and counter-claims of competing private religions, private moralities, and private businesses would be at best only adjudicated by bureaucratic techniques.

More must now be said about why, conceptually, it is important to see that religious commitment involves making serious claims as to the nature of things, what the setting of human life is like, as well as serious claims as to how human persons should behave in that setting.

Her claim, rightly so, is that productivity, as well as other things, is a sign of how healthy people are.

If our theology causes us to bind heavy burdens on people's backs, while creating rules, restrictions, and regulations for how to live life with God and others, and we stifle people's joy, censor their love, and chide them for their grace, it is no wonder that people reject us and our theology, and maybe the God we claim to follow as well.

6: 5 - 6) It constitutes no claim of the petitioner; it invokes the goodness of God, which can be trusted, for even an earthly father gives good things to his children who ask him — how much more would God do so!

A number of students — and some parents as well — spoke of intergenerational tensions over how to practice Islam, and indeed over how to understand the claims that Islam made on their lives.

Well, if we don't claim (and so don't need to try to prove) uniqueness for Jesus of Nazareth, how then do we justify giving him the role and authority of compass?

But here we shall be content only to show how even the possibility of mobilizing such critical consciousness requires beliefs or assumptions that correlate well with faith's claim that reality in its depths has the character of absolute trustworthiness.

At the same time, claiming to know what God is like and how he would react to topical issues like gay marriage is ludicrous as well... by definition, if he is God, he doesn't think along the lines of a human brain, so we will never be able to understand him.

In her very complex but well - argued essay, she shows how the claim for epistemic knowledge - which, in the context of this article, would link it to the efforts to «politicise identity» or to use identity «strategically» - assumes a single centre of authority and also assumes making use of the language and tools of this authority.

Prove how good of humanbeing you are before you claim to be believer in any God.

I love how all these republicans claim to be such good christians and yet they do nothing christian like, in fact I always say «WWJD»