Not exact matches
In a recent Education Next article, «Golden Handcuffs,» we talked about winners and losers in
teacher pension systems, and about the
huge costs these systems impose on mobile
teachers due
to the back - loading of
benefits.
Funding for
teacher assistants took yet another
huge hit last year in order
to pay for the
teacher raises, which largely
benefited new
teachers, and classroom supplies — especially textbooks — continued
to languish.
But ambiguous actions like «provide for effective
teacher hiring and recruitment... and retention practices» leaves one wondering if this is just a euphemism for salary and
benefit increases (at the same time the district is offering every single parcel of «excess» property it owns for sale in an effort
to balance it's
huge budget deficit, really?).
The
benefit extends beyond the individual, and will ripple through their schools, as well as the organisations they work with during their sabbatical; our
teachers have a
huge amount
to offer!
Moreover, as with defending job security as a cheaper way
to attract decent
teachers, defined -
benefit pension plans have big downsides with hidden costs: They make it unappealing for a talented person
to work as a
teacher for just part of a career, make it hard for
teachers to move around, offer
huge bonuses
to older
teachers who don't add any special value, etc. (And this is all viewing education in isolation — committing future taxpayers
to pay for pensions
teachers are earning now is going
to mean spending less on other priorities in the future.