Sentences with phrase «huge danger from»

The lack of huge danger from the lake drainages probably was argued (possibly for the first time) by Byron Parizek and I in Quaternary Science Reviews in 2004.

Not exact matches

I think the biggest danger, or the biggest thing I see at here was from the SEO or SEM community at large is feeling like somehow, this is such a huge change, that there is this fear that suddenly search engine optimization doesn't matter, that suddenly it's obsolete.

Two weeks into the trip, though, a little luck — and a lot of danger — in the form of foul weather, with winds from the southwest, gave Collins a huge push toward England.

Knowing SIDS was a danger to their little ones, the husband and wife were sure they'd find a huge range of breathable and organic mattresses to choose from — but they were wrong.

He also believes that public safety is a huge priority, and wants to meet with all of the schoolbus drivers to get their input on what they see as potential hazards or dangers on the roads as they drive schoolchildren to and from their homes.

Someone (Huntress) tries scare tactics to convince people that there's a huge huge mortality «danger» from «low protein» diets and in reponse, it is pointed out that LOTS of poeple eat low protein diets and live to a ripe old age,... debunking this scare tactic.

her face icon... and clear direct, deliberate scare tactics trying to fool people into thinking that, even outside of this study, any one eating «low protein» diets is in huge mortral danger of 100 % [premature] DEATH... that's right folks, 100 % of people on low protein diets have early deaths from the low protein diets, ignore the person beyind the curtain, ignore the many veg and even some omni low - protein diet folks in their 80s and 90s, that's the ticket folks, no misleading scare tactic claims by Huntress here, not at all folks!

While the danger of superbugs and vulnerability to untreatable infections are on the rise, a recent study from the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) comes as a huge relief.

Journey through a huge, seamless world filled with danger and opportunity, exploring everything from sand dunes to towering ruins.

A business in which huge amounts of compensation flow from assumed numbers is obviously fraught with danger.

I have posted on RealClimate about 4 times in the past 5 years regarding the potential thaw of the methal hydrate deposits at the bottom of the oceans.I stated in my posts on your website that I believe firmly that those deposits are in quite a good bit of danger of melting from climate change feedback mechanisms.On Nov 8th, ScienceDaily posted a huge new study on the PETM boundary 55 million years ago, and some key data on how the methane at that point may very well have melted and contributed to the massive climate shift.I am an amateur who reads in the new a lot about climate change.I'd now like to say «I told you so!!!»

Of course, the issue about agw / cc and informing the polity better is not bound by a misinterpretation of what one guy in one video said by relying upon the logical fallacy (ie gross error) in cherrypicking a transcript from 12:40 versus grasping the holistic messaging that begins at 0.00 and in particular from 11m38s beginning with the HUGE GRAPHIC emphasizing 6C @ https://youtu.be/A7ktYbVwr90?t=11m39s ongoing about FEEDBACKS and their UNKNOWN QUALITY which leads into «the great danger of» comment which without drawing BREATH leads in the sentence «These positive feedback systems will take on a momentum of their own that becomes unstoppable.

RealClimate is wonderful, and an excellent source of reliable information.As I've said before, methane is an extremely dangerous component to global warming.Comment # 20 is correct.There is a sharp melting point to frozen methane.A huge increase in the release of methane could happen within the next 50 years.At what point in the Earth's temperature rise and the rise of co2 would a huge methane melt occur?No one has answered that definitive issue.If I ask you all at what point would huge amounts of extra methane start melting, i.e at what temperature rise of the ocean near the Artic methane ice deposits would the methane melt, or at what point in the rise of co2 concentrations in the atmosphere would the methane melt, I believe that no one could currently tell me the actual answer as to where the sharp melting point exists.Of course, once that tipping point has been reached, and billions of tons of methane outgass from what had been locked stores of methane, locked away for an eternity, it is exactly the same as the burning of stored fossil fuels which have been stored for an eternity as well.And even though methane does not have as long a life as co2, while it is around in the air it can cause other tipping points, i.e. permafrost melting, to arrive much sooner.I will reiterate what I've said before on this and other sites.Methane is a hugely underreported, underestimated risk.How about RealClimate attempts to model exactly what would happen to other tipping points, such as the melting permafrost, if indeed a huge increase in the melting of the methal hydrate ice WERE to occur within the next 50 years.My amateur guess is that the huge, albeit temporary, increase in methane over even three or four decades might push other relevent tipping points to arrive much, much, sooner than they normally would, thereby vastly incresing negative feedback mechanisms.We KNOW that quick, huge, changes occured in the Earth's climate in the past.See other relevent posts in the past from Realclimate.Climate often does not change slowly, but undergoes huge, quick, changes periodically, due to negative feedbacks accumulating, and tipping the climate to a quick change.Why should the danger from huge potential methane releases be vievwed with any less trepidation?

Opponents of nuclear power have started a counteroffensive to Dr. Lovelock's call for a new nuclear age, arguing that mining uranium and building nuclear plants releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide, and that the danger from accidents or terrorism is too great.