Sentences with phrase «huge error if»

Not exact matches

«If you really want to be 100 % confident in your estimate, you're either going to have to ask every American or be satisfied with a huge margin of error,» Bray, the Reed College statistics professor, says.

If Wells Fargo was simply ignoring repeated employee complaints or not making them a priority, «It was a huge, huge, huge error,» Buffett said.

«If the IRS ever came in and detected that error, the company would be socked with huge fines and back - interest charges,» O'Connor says.

I don't know who did what, but it was a huge huge error if they were getting — and I'm sure they were — communications and ignored them or sent them down.»

«If radiometric dating is false, then physics as a science must have huge errors and holes in it.

And if she is saved people sometime make HUGE errors in judgement.

After having dug this huge hole beneath our feet, Stark then builds a little footbridge across it in chapter 10, by showing that even if the Bible is full of errors, it can still be used as an authoritative tool for learning about ourselves and God.

So in summary I would say, statements like «Starting the season with 6 defenders» is one that requires a huge amount of analysis and reasoning before one can see if it is a valid report of an error.

I am a huge fan of the original Prince of Persia trilogy, and when I heard about this game I was a little worried that they would change to much of what made the original games great, and I was right, the gameplay has been completely destroyed, platforming is awkward do to too may actions being mapped to the same buttons, combat is tedious and unenjoyable, it's EXTREMELY repetitive, having to search around for light seeds just to advance the plot is stupid, and do to the fact that you can't really die the whole game just feels like trial and error, and the new Prince character is completely unlikeable, while they messed up most of the game it's got some good things going for it, the voice acting is solid, the graphics are beautiful, and the ending does have interested in seeing where the story goes from here, but I'm not sure if I want to pick up the next game they come out with, this was a huge disappointment and isn't worthy to bear the Prince of Persia name.

Unsurprisingly excellent.Great level design, visuals, sound and powers.Enemies are tougher with decent A.I.There are a lot of nooks and crannies to explore, expanding the game if you wish.If anything could have been better, it would have been a mission that only Corvo could play, and that only Emily could play inserted around mission 5 or 6 to make the game just a bit more of a compelling replay experience besides a low / high chaos run.Changing the voice of the Outsider was very jarring and a mistake.Overall it's a great addition to the franchise, albeit with several huge errors on the part of the devs.

Without strong community engagement processes, we stand to make a huge design error — we may have built a school, but will it succeed if it is not built for and by the community it intends to serve?

If audits are limited to the most recent year or two years, publishers can get away with huge accounting errors in their favor.

If your media platform is fantastic and your following is huge, then your literary agent and / or book publisher will likely forgive a few typos and formatting errors and proposal bobbles.

If there's errors, you can fix them yourself and things like paying your bills on time, even something like your cell phone bill which may not be a huge bill every month.

I guess it was the only argument you had, but it was quite funny to hear that model results are acceptable if their huge error bars manage to clip the observation error bars.

this has evolved into major research ------ as in many people have their fingers into the pie ---- a huge pie ---- billions ---- and all of these will be out of work if the truth was to come out ---- many are blind to the truth and do not want to hear it ------ for it will mean they are out of a job ------ Note the Climate change people do not want to use Satellite data ------ it is not corrected ---- but want to use the ground based monitors ---- which are corrected for location caused errors ---- by humans ------ with their lively hood at risk this adjusted Data is then feed to other researches ---- who take this data as fact --------

If they make too many errors that I see, then they're at risk — if they happen to be in charge when the sky falls, I vote for someone else — if they make a really huge number of errors, I vote for someone elIf they make too many errors that I see, then they're at risk — if they happen to be in charge when the sky falls, I vote for someone else — if they make a really huge number of errors, I vote for someone elif they happen to be in charge when the sky falls, I vote for someone else — if they make a really huge number of errors, I vote for someone elif they make a really huge number of errors, I vote for someone else

This is a huge increase and even if you still stand by your belief that Apple made a grievous error in dropping the headphone jack, Bluetooth headphone manufacturers are probably inclined to disagree.

The recruitment industry is huge and ever - growing, so even if you think you've got away with skipping your upcoming interview, this rookie error may come back to bite you later in your career.

And, if they are doing mail on behalf of others, I guarantee you there are HUGE margins of errors in any statistics they report.