This huge false positive rate could suggest that a fetus has a genetic disorder it doesn't.
Not exact matches
Spotting these reactions requires a
huge detector the size of a small office building, housed about a mile underground to shield it from cosmic rays that could yield
false positive results.
In addition to the
huge hit to your wallet, there's also the potential harm of
false positives, and just because a test has traditionally been done for a condition doesn't mean it's the best way to treat it.
Detecting antineutrinos requires a
huge detector the size of a small office building, housed about a mile underground to shield it from cosmic rays that could yield
false positive results.
My argument is that authorizers have
huge incentives to minimize
false positives (the approval of flawed proposals).
With such
huge costs associated with
false positives and far fewer with
false negatives, authorizers behave rationally when adding front - end barriers.
Search services specializing in opinions held by the public (ie, «cloudsourced» ones like Google) are a much weaker tool, and generate
huge numbers of
false positives.