Of course it would be far from a simple matter, but then we are talking about averting
a huge global disaster.
Not exact matches
Is it the
huge chunks of comet or asteroid a kilometre or more across that threaten
global disaster once every 500 000 years or so?
EPA's attempt to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide would also be a
disaster if the Trump Administration allows the Obama regulations to be implemented since CO2 is not a pollutant, does not have a significant effect on
global temperatures, and would have had
huge adverse effects on the economy, on plants, and on poor people for no purpose.
They should prioritize the teaching of natural history, learning in outdoor settings, and studying local ecosystems, while refraining from instilling «ecophobia,» a focus on
huge global environmental
disasters which makes kids feel even more removed from nature.