Not exact matches
Real - world
data back the claim: Accumulations
of calcium carbonate in deep - sea Pacific sediments show that the Pliocene
ocean experienced
huge shifts at the time, with waters churning all the way from the surface down to about three kilometers deep, as would be expected from a conveyor belt — type circulation.
And will mean scientists can do research for more
of the year, can reach areas they've never been able to penetrate before, and will be able to bring back
huge amounts
of data on the
ocean and marine biology,» Osborne said during a speech in Cambridge, according to a ScienceInsider post by Daniel Clery.
and suffer from a
huge lack
of observational
ocean data, especially subsurface
data, as well as from short time periods.
The basic fact
of warming is supported by a
huge array
of complementary
data (
ocean warming, ice melting, phenology etc).
It involved a
huge amount
of data, taken from
ocean buoys that take the temperature
of the deep sea, along with satellites that measure energy flowing into and out
of the atmosphere.
And remember, the satellite
data are one small part
of a vast amount
of data that overwhelmingly show our planet is warming up: retreating glaciers,
huge amounts
of ice melting at both poles, the «death spiral»
of arctic ice every year at the summer minimum over time, earlier annual starts
of warm weather and later starts
of cold weather, warming
oceans, rising sea levels,
ocean acidification, more extreme weather, changing weather patterns overall, earlier snow melts, and lower snow cover in the spring...
The team tracked 10 years
of data from 17 icebergs, 18 — 50 kilometers long, as the
huge blocks bobbed around the Southern
Ocean.
As for lying, I have observed many scientists seem to have no difficulty with lying when they connect, without a shred
of evidence, supportive modeling or any
data or often even any theory such things as extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the
ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a
huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to manmade warming rather than fishing, all warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etc..
When I started to look at the global warming issue my initial inclination was to look at
Ocean data, since it's such a
huge heat sink, relatively constant backscatter, and potentially the source one would want to measure with as much accuracy as possible., Also, Seemed to me like it was a «natural» filter
of noisy
data.
The Levitus
ocean heat content
data says that
huge amounts
of heat are going into the
ocean and coming out
of the
ocean on a quarterly basis.