OrthoPA, there are two
huge problems with your approach to this issue.
Not exact matches
exlonghorn, there are two
huge problems with your assessment of OrthoPAs
approach to the issue.
This
approach presents a
problem for the Labour leadership who have pursued a policy of «constructive ambiguity» in order to balance affluent middle class remainers
with huge swathes of the electorate in its northern heartlands who voted to come out.
The main
problem with all of these
approaches is that there is no clear pathway to scaling the number of quantum bits up to the millions needed without the computer becoming
huge a system requiring bulky supporting equipment and costly infrastructure.
Just as markets are being «mended»
with something that is not solving the credit crunch,
approaches to this
problem include measures that may be
huge in scale but don't address the root of the
problem.
The
problem with this whole
approach is that they still have this idea that natural variation is a small «error» ontop of a
huge known, and not that natural variation is almost all the signal of which a small part ought to be human induced, but you really can't tell because the noise dominates the signal.
The
problem with this
approach is that while a gallon of gasoline is a gallon of gasoline (depending on the source, the impact can be higher or lower, but there's still a clear range), the electricity used to charge the LEAF's battery can come from a wide variety of sources
with a
HUGE range of environmental impacts.
While we understand the attractiveness of a cautious commitment to LPM, we also see real
problems with piecemeal
approaches or putting
huge numbers of lawyers into auditoriums to sit through large - scale group training sessions (we have found that to allow hands - on interaction and practice, LPM workshops really shouldn't exceed 30 participants).
I have a
problem wall about that size in the hallway that is in need of a
huge pick - me - up, and I may tweak it
with a similar
approach.