The movement of the ice leads to
huge variability over small scales, with many interesting scenes and patterns visible and a variety of color shades.
Not exact matches
At this point I'll put on my pointy academics hat and say that
over 12 months the total return of a portfolio of stocks has a
huge variability and so whoever wins will of course simply be the one that was the luckiest.
The thermosphere experiences
huge temperature swings
over the diurnal cycle and due to solar
variability that vastly dwarf anything seen at the surface or troposphere.
The longest series
over land, some 1.5 years, 3 samples per day, shows such a
huge variability (66 ppmv — 1 sigma) that one can't trust the data at all.
In reality — both are not accurate enough to say anything much
over such short periods and with such
huge variability.
If you remove anthropogenic forcing of the past century (i.e. hold CO2 at the preindustrial level of 280 ppm) and do test runs, including all known natural modes of internal
variability that actually occurred
over the past century, including solar, ENSO, PDO, AMO, and volcanic forcing, no model run even comes close to simulating the climate after about 1960, with
huge divergence occurring in about 1980.
This is very important as it blows
HUGE holes in the denier arguments that this
variability is responsible for ANY of the accumulated natural
variability over the llast 130 years.
This is very important as it blows
HUGE holes in the denier arguments that this
variability contribution is responsible for ANY of the accumulated natural
variability over the last 130 years.
We looked at volcanoes, solar effects, CO2 etc. and while we found clear signals (increasing + ve phase in each case), the signals are small compared to the
huge interannual
variability, and are thus only detectable with many examples superposed, or
over long time scales.