Sentences with phrase «huge wages by»

To be clear, I do not loathe him for wanting to leave, since he has high ambition, which he is never going to achieve with us BUT loathe him because he is still picking up huge wages by using Walcottitis disease; not trying.

Not exact matches

Since 2002, almost 250,000 manufacturing workers have lost their jobs because of the high dollar and our huge and growing trade deficit with developing Asian countries. Many are older workers who will typically face a long stretch of unemployment, followed by employment in a new job at much lower wages.

By giving out huge salary to average players has put us in this predicament in the first place because now every average player now wants a pay rise and our wage cap is so high that it has become unsustainable, meaning we can't pay the right wages to the right players.

He would have to be wooed and awed by a massive wage / contract in order to leave and at 32, it is hard to see a top team paying huge wages to a center back who had two years of top flight experience.

Given his huge wages and considering he'll be 35 years old by then, do you think Arsenal should go for him?

He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be in a position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have not been in the position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.

Well, he is right that the players, by and large are a bunch of halfhearted coasters, staying at the club MAINLY to continue to pick up huge wages.

To be honest, over the whole last decade I am appalled by how Wenger collects timid players, ESPECIALLY 9 stone dripping wet midfield dwarfs, whom he generally plays out of postion on the right wing for a spell, thus undermining their condidence, most of them injury prone, yet kept unproductively for years and years, on the treatment table whilst still pocketing huge wages and rarely playing 100 % even when fit.

And while we are on that dread subject of Walcott, how many more decades will this wastrel be encouraged by the club to keep picking up huge wages for nothing in return.

In reality Arsenal has been a loser team for the past 11 seasons bailed out by the creation of new leagues to give more games to loser teams needing vast finances to pay huge player wages.

Then you can save money for the owner by having no real superstars so no huge wages + even have 13 average players on low wages 5 of whom are usually injured and 8 who play one game in 3 mostly from the bench.

The money footballers get already is huge so i'm not sure many players will be enticed by going and playing in a hugely inferior league by offers of stupidly high wages.

Expect Sanchez to pull a van Persie, two good years followed by exile to Russia or Turkey due to his huge wages and waning skills.

Wenger's reluctance to fold to the booming inflation in football transfer fees and wages was often used as a shield by the board for not splashing out despite huge cash reserves.

Its hard to believe that manu lost 6 - 1 to man city, take nothing away from man city but every club uses manu as a measuring stick to compare themselves too, I really wish it was arsenal that gave that drubbing, I remember not long ago I was watching arsenal lose to manu by that you know what scoreline and my father (a manu fan) walk away, when it was 3 something becoz he couldn't watch a far one sided match, so I guess he is feeling what we are feeling that day, manu is always a side that neva lose by a huge margin no matter what, but tell you da truth I don't like man city becoz I do nt like a side that will spend and replace every single player and still have classy players on the bench, they can say that we won that and this but that becoz of the huge wages that we are paid, I just don't like football to be won by having money to spend there should be a mixture of everything good, middle and work in progress players.

Spurred by the extreme inequities of the Gilded Age when industrial barons like the Carnegies and Rockefellers amassed huge fortunes while the majority of the country suffered in impoverished conditions, the Progressive Movement began to address issues such as child labor and fair wages.

Right now, healthcare benefits provided by employers aren't taxed like wages are, which is a great way for employers to save on their taxes, so this added cost would be a huge change in the way businesses do business.