Sentences with phrase «huge wages for»

He pays huge wages for players of dubious value or even throws away the little transfer budget he's given on terrible buys like Matri (paid as much as Juventus got Tevez for), moves like Torres or other fake players presented to us as if they were champions.

Some people may have noticed, if they are astute, (sarcasm) that I have been trying to get Walcott out of our club for a full decade (out of the 12 wasted years he has been shirking on the pitch and conning huge wages for nothing in return) Yet still this idler remains, uselessly, miles from the first eleven and picking up # 110,000 pw.

Otherwise why keep him and on huge wages for all that time?

Until this tiny petty manager and owner leave football to the real passionate experts out there we won't even exsist as a top club so we're better off waiting for that day to come in 2/3 years and hope usamanov is the man to take over and cleanse the whole club from top to bottom and rid of Wengers cancer and loosers who get paid way to much just to install a tiny weak loser mentality and petty training and transfers Tactics with teeny weeny transfer fees and huge wages for mediocre staff n players Bring on 2020

And while we are on that dread subject of Walcott, how many more decades will this wastrel be encouraged by the club to keep picking up huge wages for nothing in return.

Not exact matches

That might not make a huge difference for one year, but it could add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars of lost wages over the course of your career.

The deduction creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is counted as pass - through income rather than wages.

The 25 percent bracket creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is pass - through income rather than wages.

The deduction creates a huge loophole for rich people, who could incorporate as sole proprietorships and «contract» with their employers so their income is pass - through income rather than wages.

We are seeing companies making huge profits and CEOs and other executives taking home millions in bonuses, but those same companies won't add any jobs or raise the wages for their current employees.

It's absolutely stunning what a huge impact just 0.4 % of your annual wages can make for people in need.

So Wenger bought an 16 year old Chamberlain from Southampton for a higher value and kept on trying and trying in many positions and once he's ready we don't have a contract enough to keep him nor he's not interested to sign up because he's hunger for play rather than getting a huge wages.

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

Trouble for us though is that we, or rather Wenger, consistently waste huge money on overpaying bang average players and keeping them for years while not producing results that their wages would make us expect.

This last decade he avidly collects dead wood and hoards it, treasures it even and throws huge wages at it, for virtually no return.

You may be very sure that wherever a tota dud CB is in the world, he will end up at Arsenal, often for huge and grotesquely overpaid fees and wages.

THEY, have also had to pay hugely inflated transfer fee for all of them, and, apart fro Di Maria, Utd are a big step up from their previous clubs, and, will get a huge hike up in wages.

Over the last three seasons he has not delivered a lot for the huge wages he is paid.

Given his huge wages and considering he'll be 35 years old by then, do you think Arsenal should go for him?

It would be greater still if we had not wasted the last twelve years dishing him out huge wages, for nothing in return.

Ozil is no longer an attractive prospect for bigger clubs so he'll stay and pocket a huge wages package.

He is a player who we can't afford to lose.The club knows this, the fans know this, and just as importantly so does Mesut Ozil.The fact that he will be in a position to get himself a very nice Signing On Fee from whichever club he signs for after June means he will get the financial rewards he always wanted.Who can blame him for getting the very best for himself.If his abilities had been appreciated by the club and management earlier then the player would have not been in the position we have now where the cards are all held by him.To keep him will cost the club a huge signing on fee and colloidal wages but that is the price we must pay.We need him so pay him provided it is what SVEN M and RAUL advise.Im sure the player himself would be impressed that these 2 are involved and the whole structure of the club is moving forward.

Only four in Mavropanos Mkhi, Auba Evans seems unbalanced but many of those going were ready for the knackers, hardly used or on huge wages.

But not as bad a mistake as Wenger has made keeping this bone idle coaster for nearly twelve years on huge obscenely unearned wages.

To be honest, over the whole last decade I am appalled by how Wenger collects timid players, ESPECIALLY 9 stone dripping wet midfield dwarfs, whom he generally plays out of postion on the right wing for a spell, thus undermining their condidence, most of them injury prone, yet kept unproductively for years and years, on the treatment table whilst still pocketing huge wages and rarely playing 100 % even when fit.

Proven diving, using slow motion replays and a panel of ex-players and refs, should be punished retrospectively with a six league match ban and a huge reduction in wages for tyhat period, written into the rules / laws of football and thus in all players contracts.

In reality Arsenal has been a loser team for the past 11 seasons bailed out by the creation of new leagues to give more games to loser teams needing vast finances to pay huge player wages.

One or two players, within our budget, will NOT make us favourites for either trophy, NOT, to say we can not win one, but, as a few have said, we keep buying players, we HAVE to let players go, and, no guarantee that those bought will flourish in our league, meanwhile, we lose a lot of very talented younger players, and end up like Chelsea, or Cty, with NO British players, huge wages, and still, no guarantee of success, only the club in financial difficulty.

To be clear, I do not loathe him for wanting to leave, since he has high ambition, which he is never going to achieve with us BUT loathe him because he is still picking up huge wages by using Walcottitis disease; not trying.

Then you can save money for the owner by having no real superstars so no huge wages + even have 13 average players on low wages 5 of whom are usually injured and 8 who play one game in 3 mostly from the bench.

So what are you trying to say it's ok for a player to be transfered to Arsenal on the back of a huge transfer fee and wages and perform poorly in their first two seasons.

I have no problems going for Khedira but such high wages for a player who is perennially injured is a huge huge risk!

SEE MORE: Huge boost for Liverpool as superstar plays down reports he has already agreed wages with huge Champions League Huge boost for Liverpool as superstar plays down reports he has already agreed wages with huge Champions League huge Champions League club

Wenger needs to get all 13 invisible players on the field to justify their huge wages, to prove the medical team knows what they are doing and to justify resigning the players for next season.

Kabuscorp is an acronym for Kangamba Business Corporation, a company specialising in diamond exploration — hence how the tiny African side can afford his huge wages.

Kroenke would never spend 17m on a player that the club would never use, pay huge wages and look to sell for half of that the following year.

Timing of substitutions, putting players in the wrong positions, favouritism, ignoring form, same tactics for every game, no plan B, lack of rotation, unable to sell average players because of their huge wages, and so on, and so on.

I have deeply resented this mans sheer selfishness in putting his own lust for power and huge wages above what is right and necessary for OUR club.

I could ask you how many players have actually said Wenger was the reason for joining our club, but of course you'll come back with negatives such as «they only come for an easy ride» or» Wengers pets» etc etc etc Give these proven players some credit at least You talk about huge wages (forget the favourite club rubbish) and then mention Chelsea / ManCity / Barcelona etc..

Then think of how easy it is for Arsenal to sign almost anyone from this vast market place, with the exception of a small percentage that command huge wages.

I remind you that ten years ago he scored a hat trick in an England away game but he settled, through weak character and weak body and huge undeserved wages, for a squad place and to stay at a well known club which has no real ambition to challenge at the top strata of PL and CL.

Yes let him eat the huge wages of 90k a week for nothing.

Nothing remotely compares in longevity and huge wages wasted for so very many years on a total dud and idler.

Add in the wages and the much lower selling price and that is a huge cost for very little return for Abramovic, but he can afford it and there was no damage to the team.

Wenger's reluctance to fold to the booming inflation in football transfer fees and wages was often used as a shield by the board for not splashing out despite huge cash reserves.

I haven't changed my stance once in the last 4 to 5 years and I am glad to Welcome t Lacazette and if he can even produce 75 % of the goals scored in the French league, he will be a huge bonus and it appears a true CF.We hopefully are still in the market for Mahrez as in all probability we wont let Sanchez run down his contract and walk away on a free, as that is not the Arsenal way.We need to sell several players and it's the saving of wages that is most important not what we get and a decision has to be made on particularly Wilshere and it looks like the player we arguably missed the most last season Santi Cazorla maybe coming to the end of his playing days.We have already tried to sell Gibbs and Jenkinson and in all probability add the two keepers, Ospina and Szczesny to the list which leaves Joel Campbell who seems to have missed his chance and should have been sold at a premium after the last WC, but more importantly The Ox and Giroud.Our attack force needs a real hard think as I can't see Perez as a long term Arsenal player, but Walcott, like him or not in all probability will stay.

It is a bluff, either to increase his price further, or also, when you consider that ManU, Chelsea, ManCity have a need for a creative midfielder NOW, not next year, and that the FFP means that this year might be the last where huge transfers and wages are paid, then Nasri may not find himself such willing and eager suitors next year.

According to The Sun, if Chelsea or Manchester City were to move for the 27 - year - old, he would cost a huge # 500million in total - taking into account the price of the transfer fee and wages.

Renowned for his pace, strength and a powerful left foot, the 30 - year - old star would be a top signing but can Arsenal really pay his huge wages?

While Reds fans have appreciated the footballer for travelling like a commoner, Everton fans who had boarded his train couldn't resist the opportunity to mock the player for travelling on a train despite his huge wages.