Not exact matches
Berger wishes to speak
of «a God who is not made by man, who is outside and not within ourselves,» but he limits his
act of faith in such a God to projections outward from common
human experience, i.e., to signals
of transcendence70 The result is that Berger is left finally with his own experience alone, a consequence that weakens his understanding not only
of Christian theology but ultimately
of play as well.
Or is the
human race an infallible one so that any idea can be, move over should be, taken on
faith of its truth no matter the reality
of things and then
acted on without concern
of the real truth which was «WILLFULLY» overlooked?
In other words, when theologians affirm
faith in the transcendent God
of the scripture, they are affirming
faith in the God who has
acted in
human history to make
human beings whole and redeem them from their sins.
Richardson is very skillful, however, in the use
of selectionand evocative quotation, ensuring Newman is allowed to speak for himself in clarifying the process by which the
human mind makes it possible to subscribe to an
act of religious
faith which is seen to be an
act of the intellect.
Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that
faith involves a free
act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments
of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps
of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs
of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result
faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a justreason for changing or doubting that same
faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).
Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that
faith involves a free
act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments
of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps
of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs
of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result
faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a just reason for changing or doubting that same
faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).
And religious
faiths often inspire individuals and communities to transcend their limitations in
acts of reconciliation and justice through
human rights campaigns and
acts of mercy.
My message and advice to you though, don't bank on the
acts of humans to evaluate a
faith or anything for that matter!
The tension that Israel knew throughout her life as a nation between
faith in an electing,
acting, covenanting God on the one hand, and on the other the rational improbability, if not absurdity,
of the divine promises implicit in her
faith; the conflict between the divine demand to trust and the
human doubt; the incongruity between divine promise for the nation and the incredible historical odds against fulfillment — all
of this Israel is mindful
of in the shaping
of the stories, and in the reading and cherishing
of the stories.
Eating and drinking become a
human, ethical
act in remembrance
of Jesus when they are an
act of faith, love and hope.
In his view
faith understands itself as the pure gift
of God, a God who is imaged as
acting from above and may be thought
of by analogy with
human persons.
The
faith in God is supremely
acted out in worship; and for a Christian loyal to the Christian community that worship is
of «God the Father,» manifested in what through the Self - Expression (and for us supremely in the event
of Jesus Christ) God has done, is doing, and will do in the creation, and given response through the working
of the Holy Spirit, enabling the world and
humans within it to say their Amen to God's initiating activity.
The church possesses, or better is possessed by, the principle
of life «in Christ» — a life
of discipleship that is not simply obedience to a set
of moral truths supposedly taught by Jesus but a life in which «Christ dwells in our hearts by
faith» and enables his people to
act, insofar as they are able, in conformity with his pattern
of human existence.
The equal dignity
of all
human beings, the freedom
of the
act of faith as the root
of all the other civil freedoms, -LSB-...] are likewise central elements
of the Christian Revelation that continue to model the European Civilisation.
Biblical
faith, on the contrary, is centered in the existence and activity
of a deity who is infinite in wisdom, power, and love, but who nevertheless cares personally for each
of us, a God whom we can approach in prayer and from whom we can receive help and strength, a God who is always
acting within the
human scene and is known to us by his
acts.
The text can be an
act of good
faith, because both transformation and stabilization are faithful
acts of God and both meet deep
human yearnings, but the mediation
of either comes through the vested interest
of the preacher.
And then there were bishops like Karol Wojtyła
of Kraków, who grasped that the dignity
of the
human person was the battleground on which «the Church in the modern world» was contesting with various dangerous forces for the
human future; who thought that coercion
of consciences violated that
human dignity; and who believed that the
act of faith must be free if it is to be true, because the God
of the Bible wants to be adored by people who freely choose to do so.
In the background
of every significant
human activity is the discovery
of something in the cosmos that we can rely on, depend on, have
faith in, and the more we know about the universe the more we find factors here that answer our trust so that we can
act on the basis
of their dependability.
What this means is that we can put forward credible preambula fidei (in other words, rational considerations which show that the
act of faith is fully reasonable to the non-prejudiced
human mind).
And just as in
human contacts the new understanding created by encountering another in love and trust is kept pure only when it permanently retains its connection with the other who is encountered, so too the self - understanding granted by
faith never becomes a possession, but is kept pure only as a response to the repeated encounter
of the Word
of God, which proclaims the
act of God in Christ in such a way as continually to represent it.
You say
faith is not a work but then go on to say, «
Human faith, then, is not the first step,» this admitting, at least to me, that it is a step, which is descriptive
of an
act, a work.
The dilemma becomes unbearable when you realize that doing Christian theology is an
act of confessing Christian
faith, an engagement with the life outside the church as well as inside it, and interactions with the people
of God not only in the Christian community but in the wider
human community.
My fear is that the first Anglican church, synagogue or mosque that says, «It offends our principles and the basic tenets
of our religion's
faith», will be countered by the zealots
of Stonewall moving in, saying, «We're going to sue under the Equalities
Act and the
Human Rights
Act».
However, any attorney's fees paid from public funds for any officer, employee, or agent who is found to be personally liable by virtue
of acting outside the scope
of his or her employment or
acting in bad
faith, with malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard
of human rights, safety, or property may be recovered by the state, county, municipality, or political subdivision in a civil action against such officer, employee, or agent.
This phrase is the basis
of the catholic doctrine that «unaided
human reason is unable to reach certitude, and that the fundamental
act of human knowledge consists in an
act of faith, and the supreme criterion
of certitude is authority».
In its submission in response to the Agreements Discussion Paper, the Australian
Human Rights Commission recommended that the Native Title
Act should be amended to include explicit criteria as to what constitutes good
faith, and be supplemented by a code or framework to guide parties and the NNTT as to the requirements
of good
faith negotiation.