Both have been affected
by human actions taken to control the natural environment.
I mean, that has been the case with any change that is required
in human actions.
Though I think economic reasons for action are important, they are not the dominant reason
for human action.
My point is simply this: it's not fair to conclude that religion is evil based
on human action.
The discovery illustrates how elephants sometimes try to protect themselves
from human actions.
Nothing appears more important than so altering the course of
human action as to make this total destruction less likely.
By contrast, free speech is a natural human right, which can be blocked by
other human action.
The results evoke the varied scales — from the microscopic to the global — at which
human actions affect the environment.
What specific scientific references and sources do you rely upon to conclude that there is a reasonable scientific dispute about
whether human actions are causing dangerous climate change?
Sadly, these attitudes and assumptions were retained even when in fact
human actions began to have a large effect on other living things.
That is to say,
most human action consists of learned responses, which depend on mental capabilities.
Climate models are not designed to capture record daily highs and lows with precision, and it remains impossible to know
future human actions that will determine the level of future greenhouse gas emissions.
A political and social context in which human dignity is respected will increase the likelihood of
moral human action.
Now, many of the same people who blame humans are calling for
deliberate human action to cause cooling and counteract climate change.
Such a long term prediction depends too much
on human action to be able to predict.
The existence of these services depends directly on the environmental protection and preservation, as well as on the practices that minimize the impacts
of human actions on the environment.
However, the term «sustainability» is used especially in reference to
how human actions affect the health of the natural environment.
The long - lived greenhouse gases, however, can be considered an external forcing clearly influenced
by human action.
Other human actions, including decades of fire suppression, have also increased the risk and magnitude of these fires.
He wrote that scientists should not ask
whether human actions have changed the likelihood of a particular storm happening in the future.
It is always difficult if not dangerous to try to assign in a simple way the element of real sin and guilt
in human actions.
A Response to Responses») writes: «Today the uniqueness of Jesus can be found in his insistence that salvation or the Reign of God must be realised in this world
through human actions of love and justice, with a special concern for the victims of oppression or exploitation.»
In The Liturgy as Dance Carolyn Deitering writes, «Processions, prostrations, encircling of the altar or Torah, bowing, lifting the hands in prayer, swaying and dancing were all embraced as
human actions which assisted the community's prayer to Yahweh.»
In the midst of the dramatic and destabilizing changes wrought by it, new potential for
human action upon the Earth demand exploration, asking: Which forms of cooperation could arise from a new awareness of the human role in interlacing nature and technology?
If God who «suffers by reason of his unrealized, or only partly realized, existence in the world» 3 is to be more fully realized, that must be through
free human action expressive of love.4
Finally, although I'm not a climate expert, I would agree, of course, that there is most likely a large lag time
between human action and actual temperature / climate change.
The Faith perspective sets
human action within the context of an ecosystem, material (as used in the normal sense of the word by science) and spiritual (ignored or denied by western society).
The Pope's letter or encyclical addressed to all people, regardless of religion, is the Vatican's most dramatic foray yet into the climate change debate and how
human action not prayers will fix it.
Whether you suffer in this world or the next,
Human actions create reaction by this GOD and that is the Doctrine people have been taught for centuries.
What has just been mentioned is the critical point
where Human Actions are legitimately restricted; to state it again - when an act would violate another Individual's self - ownership, this act is restricted for it would require the violator to assert at least partial ownership rights over the aggressed's Life which would be a contradiction of his own self - ownership.
Phrases with «human action»