Traces of such language contacts support that the mixing populations also mixed their languages as part of
human adaptation strategies for this region and its precarious environment.
Not exact matches
The study suggests that an understanding of how
human use of the landscape interact with climate and ecosystem processes is important for organizations that want to develop
strategies for climate change
adaptation, biodiversity conservation and local development in one of the world's poorest regions.
By the same token, evidence of coastal
adaptation can also mark
human activity and a
strategy for meeting the brain's growing energy needs.
Adaptation for both natural and
human systems is increasingly important as a coping
strategy due to the rate and scale of ongoing and potential future change.
The solutions, however, must also include a much better focus than present on climate change
adaptation and reducing vulnerability to drought — a «no - regrets»
strategy that will help both with natural variability, and the variability that could be made more challenging by
human - caused climate change.
What we can do, however, is develop
strategies of
adaptation and mitigation, how
humans will be affected, how our lives will change, and how we can prevent a dramatic loss of life due to ecological disaster, scarcity of resources, or other significant problems.
One thing I see lacking in this «longest monopoly game» is discussion of the most well proven, well practiced
human strategy in dealing with adverse environments:
adaptation and mitigation on a case - by - case basis.
After these threats are identified for each resource, then the relative risk from natural - and
human - caused climate change (estimated from the global climate model projections, but also the historical, paleo - record and worst case sequences of events) can be compared with other risks in order to adopt the optimal mitigation /
adaptation strategy.
As noted in the overview of a Climate and Health Workshop at the NOAA Southeast Regional Climate Center: «The ultimate success of
adaptation and mitigation
strategies in response to climate change and
human health will depend on the depth of understanding of the mechanistic links between climate change and the complex components of
human health.»
At present, the US itself lacks a federal
adaptation strategy, and faces escalating costs of inaction in both monetary and
human terms.
In the conclusion to his «Plan B» chapter (p 228), Bob Carter writes: «It is therefore time to move away from stale «he - says - she - says» arguments about whether
human carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous warming, and on to designing effective policies of hazard management for all climate change, based on
adaptation responses that are tailored for individual countries or regions... By their very nature,
strategies that can cope with the dangers and vagaries of natural climate change will readily cope with
human - caused change too should it ever become manifest.»
James Hansen and colleagues remark that «Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide [are such that] burning all fossil fuels would make most of the planet uninhabitable by
humans, thus calling into question
strategies that emphasize
adaptation to climate change.»
Becoming embedded in planning processes, integrated within existing programs such as disaster risk management and water management,
adaptation strategies are increasingly being adopted to mitigate the effect of global warming on
humans.
However (and thankfully), abandoning old capitalistic and nationalistic get - rich - quick ideologies, collaborating on never - before - seen international levels for the purpose of achieving the greater good of humanity, and all of the
adaptation strategies being adopted on local levels across the globe are among the significant positive effects of global warming on
humans.
Burning all fossil fuels, we conclude, would make most of the planet uninhabitable by
humans, thus calling into question
strategies that emphasize
adaptation to climate change.
On the basis of well - established evidence from the past 20 years, there is now wide consensus among scientific organizations and approximately 97 % of climatologists that
human - generated greenhouse gas emissions are the cause of climate change.1 — 4 Although the effects of climate change are already being felt across the world, the magnitude of the effects of future changes depends on our ability to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and implement
adaptation strategies within the ensuing decades.5 Thus, it remains possible to protect children, families, and communities from the worst potential effects of climate change.
This policy document offers a brief summary of the results of the research project «climate change and
adaptation strategies for
human health» (cCASHh), coordinated by WHO and supported by the European Commission.
This policy document presents the full results of a three - year European collaborative project on climate change and
adaptation strategies for
human health (cCASHh).
IPCC was set up to study
human - caused climate change, its negative impacts and possible
adaptation and mitigation
strategies.
Strategies for mitigation and
adaptation must be holistic, taking into account not only the ecological dimensions of climate change, but also the soclal impacts,
human rights, equity and environmental justice.