Sentences with phrase «human being in real life»

How To Meet Men Without Online Dating The only way I actually meet a human being in real life... in the air the apps held the brass ring.
Rich women seeking poor men who are... Best Rich Men Dating Site to Meet Rich Men — SeekingRich.com is the best rich men dating site for How To Meet Men Without Online Dating The only way I actually meet a human being in real life... in the air the apps held the brass ring.
Since I was born in 1982, online dating is one thing I've... The only way I actually meet a human being in real life is if I put forth 100 percent of the effort.
The only way I actually meet a human being in real life... in the air the apps held the brass ring.
Like you are a real human being in real life: — RRB - not a brand's coat rack!

Not exact matches

Even the savviest web - hack will have to eventually interview the old - fashioned way: That is, in person, in real life, across the desk with a real human.
Some games were made up of random groups of people, while others involved small groups of people who were connected to one another, similar to how humans tend to congregate in real - life scenarios.
«If you're near (a bank branch) feel free to go in and initiate a conversation with a real live human being
Once the system seemed to be working, Kopparapu arranged for tests at a Mumbai hospital to see how the app would perform in a real - life setting, and so far it's done just as well as a human specialist, although the data is limited.
The company relies on human labor, and Airbnb Trips, he argues, is technology in the service of bringing people together, to experience new things in real life, not on screens.
We are living in interesting times, where digital assistants schedule meetings, chatbots work alongside humans as teaching assistants, and your smart phone translates Mandarin to English in real time.
A Christian charity has said the sanctity of human life in Britain is under «real, real threat» after... More
every man is Jesus if is human a humanitarian who give they life the soldier the real citizen other are person and people we all are a family GOD is the woman we all had a mother think Obama mama is all our mama this nation brain wash because greed and ignorance everyday in deception and manipulation is world order that is why 9/11 call the police the CIA explain all in movie in deception the rich few know all is in the moral, respect and honor the president is correct all in the education but ignorance is bless because we all have greed, they want dome is shipper that is why gay a lot in this nation ignorance..
The only real overlap between most humans is that, among often many other goals, we mostly seek to reduce life time misery and increase happiness in ourselves and, usually, those around us.
To maintain its dependency scam, revenue flow, nd unearned privileges and tax dodges, religion tries to force itself into every aspect of life when dying is a time to bask in the glow of loving human, real relationships... and perhaps make a few apologies... like for wasting others; time with ignorant, self - servinge proselytizing.
Rather, the new NIV here makes it possible for English readers to discover a more Catholic or Orthodox or truly Lutheran Paul, one who teaches that the problem with the Jewish law is its ethnic and temporary character and that human salvation concerns our real sacramental participation in divine life, real transformation, and ultimate resurrection.
Instead, in the very human act of puffy eyes and hiccuping, of confessions and confrontations, I found God all over again and I was restored to a very real and very holy friendship, to a life without the protective armour.
What so many Catholics seem to be saying is that, so far as we can determine with our unaided human intellects, according to even the «metaphysically modest» version of neo-Darwinism, there is no real plan, purpose, or design in living things, and absolutely no directionality to evolution; yet we know those things to be true by faith.
William James concluded that human life is either a «real fight in which something is eternally gained for the universe by success» or it is a trivial game from which «one may withdraw at will.»
Even though I am human and not God, part of my responsibility as a parent is to reflect to my babies my full, deep, wide, and as - unconditional - as - possible love in the midst of their real lives, their real emotions, so that they can feel more secure and free.
Thus in dealing with the real human problems, such as the relief of suffering, the adjustment of personality, the release from fear and ignorance, the care of the physically or mentally defective or of the aged and infirm, there is nearly always a desperate shortage of living agents, and among their small number the cozily non-committed agnostic is very rarely to be found.
For the church to be pastoral it must be willing to engage in the real human drama of people's lives.
One of the most helpful ways a congregation can engage in pastoral care is by studying issues that might create moral dilemmas before they are brought to the church in the form of real, live, human beings.
Appraisal, he tells us, involves discerning (1) the ontological features of the human, especially in its relation to the divine, (2) what is «enduring, true and real» about the tradition, (3) what this truth implies for concrete «choices, styles, patterns and obligations» of life, and (4) the connection between these different levels of truth in the tradition and concrete situations that we confront in our everyday life.
All you got to do is research them yourself, also Christianity in it's purest form is not religion, it is truth because all you have to do is study the Holy scriptures and apply them to your life & human history & you'll see this is the real deal & not some book written y a bunch of random guys whio wanted to tell a good story.
Pro-life folk honestly believe that the fetus growing in the womb is a real, unique, human life, and the idea of killing a baby is totally appalling.
(3) third, it aims to equip humans to live in the real world not least of all by «calling the thing what it actually is» to use Luther's words in the Heidelberg Disputation.
But in its slow and imperceptible processes, the real battles for human freedom and for the pushing back of the boundaries that restrict human life are ultimately won.
If, as I think orthodox Christianity ultimately teaches, and as Solzhenitsyn's «Father Severyan» plainly teaches in November 1916 (excerpted here), that humans are inherently prone to violence (and that the lesser evil of state - derived war is the price we pay for living not in anarchy but in «sword - bearing» states), then not only is 1) contrary to the New Testament's real teaching, but 2) is impossible and 3) requires a coercion that will bring with it very deleterious consequences.
Third, the context has shifted: in contrast to the traditional Catholic conception of the political community, and politics within such communities, as the means of achieving real if limited justice for human life in the world, and a corresponding theory of international relations, recent Catholic thought on war often treats the state as a locus of injustice and the goals of particular states as inherently at odds with the achievement of common human goals, while an internationalism defined in terms of the United Nations system is proposed as the best means to those common goals.
A possible real connection with the animal kingdom is itself of relatively little theological importance, for anything in it that would be important for the theological interpretation of human life in the present, can also be known without it, that is to say, the vulnerability of man in face of the powers of this earth, man's temptation to see himself from the point of view of his animality, his liability to death, man's dynamic orientation and task of developing to his perfection from below upwards, beyond his beginnings.
In Buber «is» and «ought» join without losing their tension in the precondition of authentic human existence — making real the life between man and maIn Buber «is» and «ought» join without losing their tension in the precondition of authentic human existence — making real the life between man and main the precondition of authentic human existence — making real the life between man and man.
In the first place God's love is so real, so intense, that it is thought to be inconceivable that once God has so painstakingly created human life, after such a fashion that the human heart is «restless until it finds its rest in God,» God will either destroy that human life or permit it to be destroyeIn the first place God's love is so real, so intense, that it is thought to be inconceivable that once God has so painstakingly created human life, after such a fashion that the human heart is «restless until it finds its rest in God,» God will either destroy that human life or permit it to be destroyein God,» God will either destroy that human life or permit it to be destroyed.
Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.
... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....
Jesus Feminist is really a story — a story about how I am learning to set up a little outpost for the Kingdom of God in my real right - now life, as a sign and a foretaste of what it means to be human in God's kingdom.
Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way of looking at real things, then we will need to think about freedom, human action, responsibility, the meaning of life, the self, etc. in a new way.
But still, there's this real - world human Jesus, living a real - world human life the way real - world human life was intended, busting out of every box anyone ever tried to put him in, refusing to stay on the cross the church tries to keep him safely hung up out of the way on, making his own path through the wilderness in full color and 3D...
Why believe in real truth - that actually confronts the deep multiplicity of what it means to be human, and actually change your life - when you can believe in your own shallow truth that simply adds to one's self - justification and denial of reality, and remain the way you are?
What are they teaching children about what it means to be human, about decision - making, about social roles, about living in the real world?
Are they teaching what it means to be human, about decision - making, about social roles, about living in the real world?
But what we have established so far is that the exercise of power in history, the expression of the interests, vitalities, and wills which belong to us as human beings, and even the participation in the inevitable conflict of these interests and vitalities, are not in contradiction to the real human good which is the earthly content of our life in the love of God.
For as regards infra - human living things, even on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected to examination, whether the living substantial formal principle of what in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material points in space and time, manifests itself more than once in space and time.
But there is an illumination and we can know that there is a patient, redemptive reality in and through all of life which transmutes real evil, real loss, real threats to the growth of human good into the deeper, more sensitive and more enduring goods of love and humility?
Yet the only way to rescue aversio a deo from mythology is to show that it corresponds to a real experience in human life — that in fact it is equivalent to the» Verfallenheit» of which the existentialists speak.
He was saying, «Look, while you come up with your three simple steps to deciding whether you can heal on the Sabbath or not, here is a real, live human being who is hurting and in need of your help, and all you can do is sit there and debate about him like he was a log blocking the road.
In a real sense, the principle use of imagination is to inform and vitalize human life.
Some would insist that each life is valuable, others might question whether some children with very severe brain damage are in any real sense capable of human life.
Moreover, as Screwtape himself admits, a distinct advantage of the Enemy is his full understanding of real life, derived from his former existence in the human world.
Does myth express a timeless philosophy of human life, or is it a real event of salvation history (e.g. the event of the resurrection), an event to which faith knows itself to be related, and to which it bears witness in the language of mythology?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z