Assumptions about fabricating an artificial brain ignore what little we know about how
the human brain thinks, feels and acts, and we can not view it as a slower version of a computer.
Not exact matches
The
human brain and natural intelligence are far from being understood, and without that fundamental knowledge coming first, it will likely be impossible to create a truly
thinking machine, they say.
Kurzweil has appeared in Inc. magazine numerous times (he let us scan his
brain and told us how to predict the future) and is the leading advocate of a school of
thought called the singularity, which says, essentially, that
humans will eventually turn into robots and live forever.
«Two adjacent
brain regions allow
humans to build new
thoughts using a sort of conceptual algebra, mimicking the operations of silicon computers that represent variables and their changing values.»
Yes, Musk's choice of words was poor, but his
brain is too busy
thinking about Hyperloops and colonizing Mars to worry about how our puny
human brains might misinterpret him, okay?
«Over time I
think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence,» said Musk according to a CNBC report, adding that «some high bandwidth interface to the
brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between
human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem.»
The
human brain is naturally designed to
think negatively.
Twitter today is taking another step to build up its machine learning muscle, and also potentially to improve how it delivers photos and videos across its apps: the company is acquiring Magic Pony Technology, a company based out of London that has developed techniques of using neural networks (systems that essentially are designed to
think like
human brains) and machine learning to provide expanded data for images — used, for example, to enhance a picture or video taken on a mobile phone; or to help develop graphics for virtual reality or augmented reality applications.
so you
think a better answer is the
human brain was created by magic?
The
human brain's reflexive
thinking about tribes and taboos blinds us to our stupidity and religion often capitalizes on that.
There is still no explanation for the spontaneous origin of the universe, as well as the advanced cognition of the
brain (chemicals and genetics reveal general trends, but no one knows how complete
thoughts are actually formed, nor emotions or personalities); creation and the
human conscious, the two fundamental focuses of religion.
every man is Jesus if is
human a humanitarian who give they life the soldier the real citizen other are person and people we all are a family GOD is the woman we all had a mother
think Obama mama is all our mama this nation
brain wash because greed and ignorance everyday in deception and manipulation is world order that is why 9/11 call the police the CIA explain all in movie in deception the rich few know all is in the moral, respect and honor the president is correct all in the education but ignorance is bless because we all have greed, they want dome is shipper that is why gay a lot in this nation ignorance..
A modern banana, an ant, a bumble bee, a monkey (the ones you
think we came from), and the
human brain (among a million other things created) disprove the theory of evolution in just one sentence worth of their description.
Science has it 100 % right on this fact, the
human brain is what enables us to process any conscious
thought.
Human thoughts and actions are caused by synapses firing in the
brain.
The ONLY reason
humans think and know anything, is because they have heathy
brain tissue and function.
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the
human embryo is not as unique as we
thought before... We do have to
think differently about the «unique quality of
human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our
human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other
human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»
I understand that the
human brain, or mind, is capable of far more than you
think.
Lucretius
thought that the soul nestled in the
human breast; Descartes located it in the pineal gland; and process theologian John Cobb, following Alfred North Whitehead, hopes to find mind wandering as a thread through the «interstices of the
brain,» But if we are truly dealing with metaphysics, then the mind and the soul, like the risen Christ, will not be anywhere, but holistically related to the body.
Be proud to be a
human, use that amazingly complex
brain of yours to figure out all of the mysteries of the universe and stop
thinking without being honest and critical of your ideas.
Did you ever
think when you are typing words, gathering your
thoughts, deciding / choosing what to say, and using the best intellect you can find in your
brain; that you are conscious in these
thoughts / decisions, and that your eyes / hands /
brain synapses, are all part of the lense (of the
human body) that you are able to see and control to the limitations inherent in its essence?
Deities and afterlives are, to me, an absolutely natural side effect of the
human brain's ability for abstract
thought.
Bill, I feel sorry for you, you being a scientist and yet unable to create anything close to a
human, or a constellation system, or a
brain to
think really logically with is amazing to me... if you want to believe that there was a big explosion somewhere in the universe beyond this world and that is how you came to be you can keep that theory but don't tell parents what to do with there children.
Don't you
think that it's more likely what people call the voice of god is simply a complex awareness created by the
human brain which has been evolving its ability to recognize patterns for millions of years?
Without the process of biological evolution, which produced the
human brain, there would be no sanctified souls; and similarly, without the evolution of collective
thought, through which alone the plenitude of
human consciousness can be attained on earth, how can there be a consummated Christ?
No, I
think he is actually arguing that the Holy Spirit is just an articulation of some organic process within the
human brain.
Under the guise of the scientific notion, I defy science to reproduce the
human brain, create DNA that matches with another person, create a universe that has order, make
humans with all the complexities all the same with identical DNA factors, and every
human with the same finger prints as another, and when an atheistic scientist can do that, I will rethink my level of
thoughts in regards to God.
So for example, in my case and that of other persons whose minds dissociate when we engage in intense / deep spiritual practices like intense / deep prayer, meditation, fasting etc and we hear voices, hallucinate, see visions, experience
thought insertions, automatic channelling just like a spirit medium as well as other psychic phenomena (clairvoyance etc), and the mind dissociation makes some persons mentally and emotionally unstable; our minds enter an altered state of consciousness just like those of the Buddhist monks but in our case the altered state of our
brains results in psychotic and psychic symptoms being induced (interestingly, some persons who are ignorant of how the
human brain functions chalk up these experiences to demonic attack)......... are these psychotic, psychic experiences which persons like myself experience a gift from God as well?
He called his view «materialistic,» in so far as «it does not allow the possibility of any
human thought without a
brain and a movement in this
brain.»
If your making comments like this about something so obvious all I could only imagine what your
brain thinks about other races, the truth about American history and the
human race and its history.
If your making comments like this about something so obvious; I could only imagine what your
brain thinks about other races, the truth about American history and the
human race and its history.
His religious difficulty came from the kind of theology he found around him, its habit of identifying words in a book (written by
human hands and
thought by
human brains) with the words of God, also from the habit of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation of the freedom of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.
Finite
human freedom can be realized only in something objective, even if this were to be
thought of as consisting merely in
brain cells, conceptual mechanisms, associations, that is, basically in social or psychological models of
thought, or if it were to belong — but only seemingly — to a merely inner realm of
thought.
Why would your god create something as staggeringly amazing and powerful as the
human brain, and then not only fail to reward people who use it, but actively punish them for
thinking and questioning.
No doubt it is true, scientifically speaking, that no distinct center of superhuman consciousness has yet appeared on earth (at least in the living world) for which it may be claimed or predicted that one day it will exercise a centralizing function, in relation to associated
human thought, similar to the role of the individual «I» in relation to the cells of the
brain.
The moment within the progress of the evolution of the
human body that this happens would indeed, we
think, be related to
brain size.
For us these are the components of reality that explain the nature of the world, the phenomenon of life within it, and even how we
human organisms
think through our
brains.
The electronic events in my
brain influence my
human thought and feeling.
And finally, at the extreme end of the known spectrum, comes the
thinking incandescence of the
human brain.
The extremely rich (experiential) data provided by the
human brain, accordingly, can be
thought to allow the emergence of a higher - level actuality, which we call the mind.
At the same time, claiming to know what God is like and how he would react to topical issues like gay marriage is ludicrous as well... by definition, if he is God, he doesn't
think along the lines of a
human brain, so we will never be able to understand him.
So termination of a pregnancy before
brain development is not evil, and can not be compared to slaughtering of millions of
thinking, conscious,
human beings.
If it was, and we are all created after his image, then you would
think that God would not have had «
humans» interpret his words for others, but would have just given us the word in our
brains from the beginning.
While I am not aware of significant discussions of this issue among process thinkers, Matthew Fox and Brian Swimme, who though not directly influenced by process
thought nonetheless share the relational vision, have incorporated elements of this, particularly through the use of art, in their own education process in order to stimulate the «right»
brain, the intuitive and imaginative capacities of the
human mind.
The cosmic tide may at one time have seemed to be immobilized, lost in the vast reservoir of living forms; but through the ages the level of consciousness was steadily rising behind the barrier, until finally, by means of the
human brain (the most «centro - complex» organism yet achieved to our knowledge in the universe) there has occurred, at a first ending of time, the breaking of the dykes, followed by what is now in progress, the flooding of
Thought over the entire surface of the biosphere.
If you
think it can't you have no knowledge of how the
human brain works.
Animal
brains don't have the cognitive capacity for «imagination» and abstract
thinking like a
human being.
It is our ability to
think and reason that makes us
human and distinguishes us from all other animals, a piece of tissue, and a baby from an embryo with no measurable
brain waves.
It (I refuse to refer to HS as
human b / c it lacks the
brain size for the normal
human),
thinks that it has this right.
Along with dualistic mythology several developments in scientific
thought since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism of mind from nature: first, there is the cosmography of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed of inanimate, unconscious bits of «matter» needing only the brute laws of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory of evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste and the apparent «impersonality» of natural selection; third, the laws of thermodynamics (and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out of energy available to sustain life, evolution and
human consciousness; fourth, the geological and astronomical disclosure of enormous tracts of apparently lifeless space and matter in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis; and, finally, perhaps most shocking of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively in terms of mindless
brain chemistry.