Sentences with phrase «human carbon»

It concluded that due to the amount of human carbon emissions in the atmosphere, the planet has reached 3 to 7 degrees Celsius of global warming.

More than 95 percent of climate scientists are convinced that human carbon pollution is causing massive and unprecedented changes to our atmosphere and oceans.

It is characteristic of a type of forest that is playing a big role in limiting the damage from human carbon emissions: a recovering forest.

Because human carbon dioxide emissions exceed removal rates through natural carbon «sinks,» keeping emission rates the same will not lead to stabilization of carbon dioxide.

After that, the planet warmed without significant human carbon emissions to blame, so what caused it?

In reality, the exact opposite is true - the growth in human carbon use and increasing levels of CO2 emissions is highly correlated with improved health and increased life expectancy.

This position does not appear to be supported by any observational evidence, much like the highly exaggerated claims concerning the effects of human carbon dioxide emissions on climate.

Scientists have released the first - ever global maps of human carbon dioxide emissions taken from satellite observations.

And for those that still deny global warming is real or not man - made, the chances that this heat record trend is NOT being caused by human carbon pollution are...

El Niño alone won't trigger an ice apocalypse — but when you combine it with human carbon pollution, it might just be the fracture that sets off the avalanche.

One recent study found that the average global temperature would rise another 3.2 ° by the end of the century even if human carbon emissions dropped to zero tomorrow, a scenario that is, of course, extremely unlikely.

«Human carbon release rate is unprecedented in the past 66 million years of Earth's history.»

At the time, most mainstream climatologists rejected the idea, arguing that human carbon production was the primary factor behind twentieth century warming.

Sea snails that leap to escape their predators may soon lose their extraordinary jumping ability because of rising human carbon dioxide emissions, a team of international scientist...

By 1979, the evidence human carbon dioxide emissions were serious threat was strong enough that the National Academy of Sciences published Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment, with this statement, «A wait and see policy may mean waiting until it is too late.»

«Thousands of scientists have been funded to find a connection between human carbon emissions and the climate.

Human emissions of carbon dioxide were negligible before 1850 and have nearly all come after the Second World War, so human carbon dioxide can not possibly have caused the trend.»

But build and buttress as it might, New York is hopeless in the long term if we can't somehow stop human carbon emissions soon.

Compared with the potential feedbacks from fossil methane or methane hydrates, the permafrost feedback from surface thawing is more certain and will happen sooner, very likely in this century, regardless of the level of future human carbon emissions.

He wrote a well - reviewed book called «The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming,» in which he presents measured skepticism of climate - change orthodoxy — for example, he believes the role of carbon emissions from human industry is greatly exaggerated by politicized science, but he doesn't think human carbon emissions are irrelevant, and is not implacably hostile to the goal of reducing them.

Science indeed says that human carbon injection is increasing the heat balance of the atmosphere (anthropogenic global warming or AGW), but science does not say we need to create a global bureaucracy.

Its methodology involves constructing and comparing two separate «accounts,» representing the supply and demand of renewable biological resources across six mutually exclusive land - use types: cropland, grazing land, forest, fishing ground, built - up land, and the area of forest required to offset human carbon emissions (the carbon footprint).

Curry also notes there's evidence the Earth has been warming for the past 200 years — a period that began before human carbon dioxide emissions would have been a factor.

The settled science assertion that rising CO2 will quickly and assuredly result in cataclysmic consequence is necessesary so as to demonize human carbon emission.

The Carbon Law says human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions must be reduced by half each decade starting in 2020.

The close relationship between ENSO and global temperature, as described in the paper, leaves little room for any warming driven by human carbon dioxide emissions.

In a September article by National Geographic, every scientist contacted by the magazine was in agreement that Harvey's destructive rainfall was «almost certainly driven up by temperature increases from human carbon - dioxide emissions.»

Reading just that people might easily be led to believe that because human carbon dioxide emissions are so small, they won't be noticed against the background noise of natural exchanges, when that is patently untrue with CO2 concentrations stable within a few ppm around 280 ppm for the last few thousand years until mass fossil fuel burning started.

The USGS model also underestimates the extent of permafrost loss by the end of the century, he said, adding that his research shows two - thirds of the state's permafrost could be lost by 2100 if human carbon emissions aren't cut.

As discussed previously, the risks arise not from the alleged climate change fears raised by the climate alarmists but rather from their ill - founded, useless, and horrendously expensive measures to reduce human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse May 20th, 2013 More than 95 percent of climate scientists are convinced that human carbon pollution is causing massive and unprecedented changes to our atmosphere and oceans.

Hence the irony in Bob Carter's conclusion «The close relationship between ENSO and global temperature leaves little room for any warming driven by human carbon dioxide emissions».