Not exact matches
At the most fundamental level, the ecological footprint incorporates six measurements — city cover,
carbon dioxide pollution, farm fields, fisheries, forests and rangeland — to reveal «the aggregate area of land and water ecosystems required by specified
human populations to produce the ecosystem goods and services they consume and to assimilate their
carbon waste.»
We know that air
pollution seriously damages
human health and terrestrial ecosystems but this «new» source of soluble iron can potentially increase the amount of
carbon dioxide stored in the oceans and, thus, inadvertently offset global warming.»
Indeed, the rehabilitation of our water bodies can not happen with a denial of science that portrays the toll of global warming on our oceans due to excessive
carbon dioxide emissions and
human folly in overexploitation, unregulated and destructive fishing, marine
pollution and habitat destruction.
But now look at the breadth of support across the United States for using
pollution regulations to curb
carbon dioxide, the main
human - generated greenhouse gas:
J.E.N. Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, writes that
human pollution of the water, as well as
human - generated
carbon dioxide emissions which are causing ocean acidification and rising ocean temperatures are rapidly killing off corals.
Key elements include curbing
human carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere, improved control of local
pollution sources, reducing coastal habitat destruction, and better preparing coastal
human communities to withstand the amount of ocean acidification and climate change that is unavoidable.
I will admit that
carbon dioxide is to plant life what oxygen is to
humans and that without it there would be no life on this planet, and stop calling it «
pollution».
The Earth's forests perform a well - known service to the planet, absorbing a great deal of the
carbon dioxide pollution emitted into the atmosphere from
human activities.
That lack of immediate concern may in part stem from a lack of understanding that today's
pollution will heat the planet for centuries to come, as explained in this Denial101x lecture: So far
humans have caused about 1 °C warming of global surface temperatures, but if we were to freeze the level of atmospheric
carbon dioxide at today's levels, the planet would continue warming.
The concentration of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere correlates closely — but not perfectly — with the amount of
carbon pollution emitted by
human activities.
But
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases aren't the only air
pollution released by
human activities.
They also lessen reliance on fossil fuels, thus decreasing
carbon dioxide emissions and other forms of
pollution harmful to
humans and the planet alike.
CLIMATE change alarmists, like Tim Flannery and the ABC, claim Australian bush fires are unprecedented and becoming more extreme, thanks to
human carbon dioxide «
pollution» emissions.
Human impacts on the climate system include increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g.,
carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons and their substitutes, methane, nitrous oxide, etc.), air
pollution, increasing concentrations of airborne particles, and land alteration.
The identification of other, sometimes more powerful, greenhouse gases such as methane, the contributions to atmospheric
carbon dioxide from other
human activities such as deforestation and cement manufacture, better understanding of the temperature - changing properties of atmospheric
pollution such as sulphur emissions, aerosols and their importance in the post-1940s northern hemisphere cooling: the knowledge - base was increasing year by year.