El Niño alone won't trigger an ice apocalypse — but when you combine it with
human carbon pollution, it might just be the fracture that sets off the avalanche.
Not exact matches
When Rajan Chakrabarty, Ph.D., an assistant research professor at the Desert Research Institute, began looking into the regional inventories of
human - produced sources of
carbon aerosol
pollution in South Asia, considered to be a climate change hot spot, he knew something was missing.
At present rates of
pollution then,
human society would blow through its
carbon budget in the next decade or so.
In forested areas, the
carbon compounds are byproducts of plants» metabolism; in populated areas, they are often from
human pollution.
«The Lancet report underscores the terrible consequences for
human health if we don't start reducing the dangerous
carbon pollution fueling climate change — and dramatic benefits for people the world over from taking action now,» echoed Kim Knowlton, senior scientist and deputy director of the Science Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a release.
At the most fundamental level, the ecological footprint incorporates six measurements — city cover,
carbon dioxide
pollution, farm fields, fisheries, forests and rangeland — to reveal «the aggregate area of land and water ecosystems required by specified
human populations to produce the ecosystem goods and services they consume and to assimilate their
carbon waste.»
The report, written and reviewed by leading U.S. scientists as part of the National Climate Assessment, reinforces that warming temperatures and extreme weather around the globe are «extremely likely» to be the result of
carbon pollution from
human activities.
Clean energy policies decrease not only
carbon pollution linked to climate change but also other types of
pollution that harm
human health, such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and fine particles that can damage the airways of
humans and other organisms.
We know that air
pollution seriously damages
human health and terrestrial ecosystems but this «new» source of soluble iron can potentially increase the amount of
carbon dioxide stored in the oceans and, thus, inadvertently offset global warming.»
«Controlling air
pollution will bring huge benefits to
human welfare but it may reduce the amount of nutrients to the surface ocean and, thus, the ocean
carbon uptake rate.
A Climate Central analysis attributed almost all of 2015's record heat to
carbon pollution from
human activities with El Niño and other natural phenomenon also playing smaller roles.
· Coal - or gas - fired systems with
carbon capture and storage (CCS) reduce GHG emissions, but increase other
pollution problems by 5 - 80 per cent, and create higher
human health and environmental impacts.
Indeed, the rehabilitation of our water bodies can not happen with a denial of science that portrays the toll of global warming on our oceans due to excessive
carbon dioxide emissions and
human folly in overexploitation, unregulated and destructive fishing, marine
pollution and habitat destruction.
Through solar panels, organic compost recycling, paper recycling, community garbage removal and community
human approach towards
pollution issues — we try to reduce our
carbon footprint.»
But now look at the breadth of support across the United States for using
pollution regulations to curb
carbon dioxide, the main
human - generated greenhouse gas:
Human alteration of environments produces multiple effects, some advantageous to societies, such as enhanced food production, and some detrimental, like environmental
pollution with toxic chemicals, excess nutrients and
carbon emissions from fossil fuels, and the loss of wildlife and their habitats.
J.E.N. Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, writes that
human pollution of the water, as well as
human - generated
carbon dioxide emissions which are causing ocean acidification and rising ocean temperatures are rapidly killing off corals.
Actions to reduce emissions of
carbon pollution and other greenhouse gases that accelerate climate change will protect
human health in both the short...
Key elements include curbing
human carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere, improved control of local
pollution sources, reducing coastal habitat destruction, and better preparing coastal
human communities to withstand the amount of ocean acidification and climate change that is unavoidable.
A new study confirms that
carbon pollution has ended the era of the stable climate conditions that enabled the development of modern civilization High levels of
carbon pollution have caused global temperatures to rise above the slow - changing, relatively stable conditions that existed «when
humans were figuring out where the climate — and rivers and sea levels — were most suited for living and farming.»
Policies and other strategies intended to reduce
carbon pollution and mitigate climate change can often have independent influences on
human health.
I will admit that
carbon dioxide is to plant life what oxygen is to
humans and that without it there would be no life on this planet, and stop calling it «
pollution».
A draft that leaked in August raised that confidence level to «extremely likely,» or greater than 95 % confidence that
humans are responsible for the majority of global warming through
carbon pollution.
Earthjustice is representing the Arctic Athabaskan Council before the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights to reduce black
carbon pollution, slow Arctic warming and protect Athabaskans» homeland.
Nature has provided
humans with a buffer against the worst effects of our
carbon pollution.
Controlling
pollution from transportation sources would greatly reduce black
carbon and ozone emissions, which affect both climate and also
human health.
Nevertheless, climate scientists realized a half century ago that
human carbon emissions qualify as
pollution due to the dangers they pose via climate change.
It is quite likely that most of the
human related warming is due to land use and black
carbon / dust
pollution.
The diagnosis is that
humans are suffering from a fever (and related symptoms) caused by our own actions — primarily emissions of
carbon pollution.
«By the way, yes, my plan will reduce the
carbon pollution that is eating our planet because climate change is not a hoax,» President Obama said at a campaign rally last week, absurdly portraying the essential gas CO2 exhaled by
humans and consumed by plants as a «pollutant» in need of regulation.
The Earth's forests perform a well - known service to the planet, absorbing a great deal of the
carbon dioxide
pollution emitted into the atmosphere from
human activities.
The clearing of rainforests and
carbon - rich peatlands for new plantations is releasing globally significant
carbon pollution, making Conflict Palm Oil a major driver of
human induced climate change.
That lack of immediate concern may in part stem from a lack of understanding that today's
pollution will heat the planet for centuries to come, as explained in this Denial101x lecture: So far
humans have caused about 1 °C warming of global surface temperatures, but if we were to freeze the level of atmospheric
carbon dioxide at today's levels, the planet would continue warming.
The planet is warming because of manmade
carbon pollution and other greenhouse gases emitted from
human activities like burning fossil fuels.
Water cycle
carbon cycle
human impacts stores processes climate change weather
pollution flooding sustainable water supply water and
carbon control at global scale To support teachers with the introduction of the 2016 A Level courses, the Society is providing a new range of online resources and support.
«The Lancet report underscores the terrible consequences for
human health if we don't start reducing the dangerous
carbon pollution fueling climate change — and dramatic benefits for people the world over from taking action now.
The best estimate from the best science is that people can limit warming from
human - caused
carbon pollution to less than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius)-- if society acts now.
Humans put about 35 billion tons of
carbon pollution into the atmosphere every year!
When people are aware of the high level of scientific agreement on
human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept that climate change is happening, that
humans are causing it and support policies to reduce
carbon pollution.
The concentration of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere correlates closely — but not perfectly — with the amount of
carbon pollution emitted by
human activities.
For one thing, it's hard to say just how much
carbon pollution humans will pump into the atmosphere 50 or 100 years from now.
Many lines of evidence now confirm our planet is warming because of
carbon pollution released when
humans burn fossil fuels like oil and coal.
Those who want to preserve the status quo have continued to deny and attack the expert consensus because it's a «gateway belief»: when people are aware of the high level of scientific agreement on
human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept that climate change is happening, that
humans are causing it, and support policies to reduce
carbon pollution.
That's not a surprise, given that more than half of the
carbon pollution from
human activities has also happened since the 1970s.
But
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases aren't the only air
pollution released by
human activities.
The global temperature is rising because of
carbon pollution from
human activities.
The truth is, about half the
carbon pollution from
humans has actually entered the atmosphere after 1979.
They also lessen reliance on fossil fuels, thus decreasing
carbon dioxide emissions and other forms of
pollution harmful to
humans and the planet alike.
Whether or not global warming is entirely or largely due to
human use of
carbon for fuel, the reduction of the dependence on
carbon makes sense for reducing asthma in children; reducing black lung disease; reducing the production of coal ashes, residues, and effluents; reducing the impact of
carbon greenhouse gasses; reducing pipeline failures; reducing coal and oil surface transport accidents; reducing pipeline - related warfare; and reducing air
pollution.
There is no doubt that
carbon pollution is a threat to
human health and should be strictly limited like other dangerous pollutants.