Sentences with phrase «human caused climate change because»

Not exact matches

I can explain climate change as a result of a natural cycle caused by the masses and orbits of the planets, but I don't go around calling believers in humans causing climate change idiots simply because I know what actually causes it.

The question of whether or not humans cause climate change matters because for many people an answer of «no» will remove the need to act, and even if the answer is «yes» it helps determine who should pay.

But Stone predicts that because species in hot environments evolve body shapes that radiate heat better, climate change will cause humans to grow taller and slimmer.

Understanding these unique areas is important because there are many examples of naturally occurring hybrid zones, and new hybrid zones will form in the future as climate change and human impacts cause species distributions to shift and come into contact.

Thus, only human - made emissions, such as factory and car secretions, could cause runaway global climate change because they lack natural negative feedbacks to balance them.

Because we are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) iclimate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) igchange is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) iClimate Change (IPCC) igChange (IPCC) ignores.

Human - caused climate change has been occurring over the last 200 yr, largely because of the combustion of fossil fuels and subsequent increase of atmospheric CO2.

«Recent surveys of meteorologists have indicated that their belief or disbelief in human cause trying climate change is really an extension of the broader public misunderstanding, and that's a real problem because meteorologists are among the most trusted messengers of information about climate change.»

During that time he was oblivious to the attacks on Ben Santer being waged by S. Fred Singer, Frederick Seitz, Patrick Michaels, Global Climate Coalition (a group of fossil fuel interests) and others because Santer's (and others) research showed that humans were in fact causing climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment,Climate Coalition (a group of fossil fuel interests) and others because Santer's (and others) research showed that humans were in fact causing climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment,climate to change (IPCC 2nd Assessment, 1995).

Side Effect of California's Drought: More Climate Pollution 01.03.2017 — Droughts are already getting longer and more severe because of human - caused climate change in the American Southwest and around theClimate Pollution 01.03.2017 — Droughts are already getting longer and more severe because of human - caused climate change in the American Southwest and around theclimate change in the American Southwest and around the world.

«Global warming» is the best term for the current human - caused climate change because it is the main characteristic feature of the change.

There may not be many scientists who doubt the human cause of recent climate change but, because of politics, their influence is exaggerated and the public has been quite deliberately misled about the level of consensus in climate science.

Scientists stopped arguing decades ago because there is multiple lines of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real, happening right now and is caused primarily right now by humans.

This is not a careful argument, because people — sceptical and not — have been questioning the leaps between observing that the earths temperature changes, the attribution of that change to humans, the conclusion that it will cause catastrophe, and that the only way to confront that catastrophe is by mitigating climate change through reduction in emissions.

If you want a study of scientists that are publicly stating that humans are the primary cause of climate change, then you won't find one, because scientists have better things to do

As I heard Penn State climate scientist Dr. Richard Alley during his talk at Climate One meeting at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco last December, «Scientists are no longer debating (whether humans are causing) climate change because that is no longer a useful discussion.climate scientist Dr. Richard Alley during his talk at Climate One meeting at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco last December, «Scientists are no longer debating (whether humans are causing) climate change because that is no longer a useful discussion.Climate One meeting at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco last December, «Scientists are no longer debating (whether humans are causing) climate change because that is no longer a useful discussion.climate change because that is no longer a useful discussion.»

So because the Earth was much warmer many millions of years ago and the Earth's climate has naturally changed due to asteroid impact, volcanic eruptions, changes in the solar flux, the emergence of plants which produced ~ 20 % oxygen content in the air and which in turn allowed animals to evolve, there's just no way that 7 billion humans can cause any problem at all.

Obama's disingenuous Tweet, whether it be «dangerous», «catastrophic» or «apocalyptic» — and he did use the word dangerous — is disingenuous because there is no such consensus on the dangers of climate change, only that climate is changing and it is likely caused, at least in part, by humans.

... incomplete and misleading because it 1) omits any mention of several of the most important aspects of the potential relationships between hurricanes and global warming, including rainfall, sea level, and storm surge; 2) leaves the impression that there is no significant connection between recent climate change caused by human activities and hurricane characteristics and impacts; and 3) does not take full account of the significance of recently identified trends and variations in tropical storms in causing impacts as compared to increasing societal vulnerability.

He's right, but the source of the risk is not the one McKibben warns of; civilization is not in danger because of the alleged human - caused climate change, but rather because McKibben and his ilk propose -LSB-...]

First, that climate change has not occurred before: an idea that only works because the public generally understands that it's caused by humans and therefore can be stopped.

The long and short of it is that the EPA endangerment finding is predicated on the fact that human - caused climate change poses a threat to public health and welfare, but Michaels and Cato argue that it's not a threat because we can adapt to it.

It is almost universally assumed that political polarization over societal risks like climate change originate in different levels of trust in scientists: left - leaning people believe in human - caused climate change, it is said, because they have a greater degree of confidence i...

Because climate change is a profound problem of ethics, morality and justice those causing the problem may not use self - interest alone as justification for their policy responses to human - induced warming, they must respond in ways consistent with their responsibilities and duties to others.

This is so because in addition to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.

This is so because: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.

This question, following up on question one, is designed to expose the fact that there is a strong ethical duty to assume human causation of climate change if there is reliable evidence of human causation and that those who seek to justify non-action on climate change because they claim that human causation has not been proven have a very strong ethical duty to demonstrate that humans are not causing climate change with high levels of proof.

Because climate change is a profound problem of justice those causing the problem may not use self - interest alone as justification for their policy responses to human - induced warming, they must respond in ways consistent with their responsibilities and duties to others.

«This heroic campaign shall be carried out on a vast scale, transforming our economy at wartime speed,» The Climate Mobilization writes, because «climate change is causing immense human suffering and damage to the naturalClimate Mobilization writes, because «climate change is causing immense human suffering and damage to the naturalclimate change is causing immense human suffering and damage to the natural world.

Coleman went on to add that he based most of his views on the findings of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), an international body that says «because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent «second opinion» of the evidence reviewed - or not reviewed - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.Climate Change (NIPCC), an international body that says «because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent «second opinion» of the evidence reviewed - or not reviewed - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.&Change (NIPCC), an international body that says «because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent «second opinion» of the evidence reviewed - or not reviewed - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent «second opinion» of the evidence reviewed - or not reviewed - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.&change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent «second opinion» of the evidence reviewed - or not reviewed - by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.&Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.»

Humans are the main cause of climate change because were the one who burn fossil fuels that contribute large amount which releases carbon dioxide gas to the atmosphere and clear trees that absorb carbon dioxide, sending heat trapping gases into the atmosphere.

It would seem that you are making these comments solely because your political viewpoint doesn't have any solution for such a problem as climate change caused by widescale human emissions of a GH gas.

Many other US politicians have also recently said they will not support legislation to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions because they are not convinced that climate change happening or is human - caused.

«Because a survey of thousands of scientific papers that took a position on climate change found that 97 percent endorsed the positions that humans are causing global warming.»

UCS and its analysts used corporate data to «imply that General Electric executives were climate change hypocrites,» because GE has said it believes the «scientific consensus» is humans are causing dangerous climate change while also supporting some think tanks who have written skeptically concerning the causes and consequences of climate change, including the Reason Foundation, which UCS accused of «misrepresenting climate change science.»

It's difficult to sort out what is happening because the IPCC only focuses on human causes of climate change.

Morano then said that the oft - touted 97 percent consensus on climate change being real and anthropogenic (meaning human - caused) was illegitimate because less than 100 scientists were polled to arrive at the 97 percent value.»

This study follows on the heels of a recently leaked draft of an Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change report, which noted that scientists believe we are experiencing more heat waves because of climate change — which yes, we're still sure humans are cClimate Change report, which noted that scientists believe we are experiencing more heat waves because of climate change — which yes, we're still sure humans are caChange report, which noted that scientists believe we are experiencing more heat waves because of climate change — which yes, we're still sure humans are cclimate change — which yes, we're still sure humans are cachange — which yes, we're still sure humans are causing.

It's only valid if science supports the claim that CO2, because of human production, is causing warming or climate change.

Those who want to preserve the status quo have continued to deny and attack the expert consensus because it's a «gateway belief»: when people are aware of the high level of scientific agreement on human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept that climate change is happening, that humans are causing it, and support policies to reduce carbon pollution.

The chart got its name because Hansen's unsupported, non peer - reviewed conjecture depicted a «run - away» line suggesting human - caused pollution was the sole culprit of greenhouse gases which is the primary cause of a changing climate.

Because slowly increasing temperatures don't seem alarming, the «availability entrepreneurs» push extreme weather events and public health impacts as being caused by human - caused climate change, more of which is in store if we don't quickly act to cool the planet by reducing fossil fuel emissions.

One Meter Sea Level Rise by 2100 Likely We think about this now because our knowledge of global sea level rise as a result of human - caused climate change has grown rapidly in recent years.

Scientists studying methane leaking from the Arctic seafloor off Norway near Spitsbergen say, with the usual caveat that more research is needed and the specific details not yet known, it does not appear that the potent greenhouse gas is being released because of human - caused climate change.

News Ltd columnist Andrew Bolt, a regular denier of the science of human - caused climate change, said Dr Salby had been «persecuted» because he had «challenged the global warming faith».

Reaching the 17 - year mark with no significant warming is a milestone because a climate change research team at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory defined it as the minimum length of time necessary to «separate human - caused global warming from the «noise» of purely natural climate fluctuations,» according to a 2011 press release.

The topic of Mike's lecture was human - caused climate change, and at the end of the talk, one member of the audience — a local who had decided to attend the seminar — made a comment during the Q+A casting doubt on the greenhouse effect, suggesting that CO2, because it was heavier than other air molecules, would simply sink to the ground (a myth that is encountered surprisingly often).