Sentences with phrase «human children did»

The raccoons performed differently than birds and human children did in previous Aesop's Fable studies, and they did not always pick the most functional option.

As Horn says, «One of the things that really surprised us is, that adult dogs behave towards their caregivers like human children do.

To aid in the removal of these baby teeth, kittens will chew and teethe on items much like a human child does.

Older dogs become arthritic while puppies have growing pains just like human children do.

Human children do not develop object permanence until they are 2 years old.

And really... You being a genius, and all, it's not like rocket science, nor even computer science, nor complex math algorithms, to understand human children do not need your service to be in contact with human adults.

Not exact matches

Marsh calls it, «an eye - opening exploration into how children are raised around the world and how child - rearing can inform the understanding of human nature more broadly,» noting the author's most essential point is that «one of the things which makes humans special as a species is that we don't limit care to our own children.

Activist Alberdingk Thijm does groundbreaking work helping activists use smartphone cameras to defend human rights, but her most profound influence is incredibly down - to - earth: classic children's book character Pippi Longstocking

Neural nets offered the prospect of computers» learning the way children do — from experience — rather than through laborious instruction by programs tailor - made by humans.

Before starting Seven Sisters wines, Kleynhans, at far right in the photo above, worked in human resources and recruitment for a small company, doing her best to help her siblings and their children.

«Supporting the needs of our employees is one of the most important things we do, especially during significant moments in their lives like having or adopting a child,» said global human - resources executive Sheri Bronstein.

Palihapitiya has repeatedly criticized social media in general, saying it preys on human vulnerabilities and that he doesn't allow his children to use it.

Since no one in this world does not have any one answer for every single child in the mother's womb about whom the child will become, there is no one answer for the nature of existence, especially humans.

just like children learn to make pictures before they learn how to correctly make written language so did early humans.

Just because the child is still in the womb, that doesn't make it any less human.

One virus - particle doesn't change color, but as it procreates mutations in that process can make the resulting child - virus differ from the parent - virus, so that the child - virus is capable of infecting a human as well as the original host thereby opening the possibility for a new human disease.

It doesn't so much matter when the first people were named Adam and Eve; what matters is that all humans are children of one God and ought to treat each other well.

If you don't believe that, you most believe otherwise.which means that you believe that all mothers gave birth to children without the need of a human male.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

But when 1.6 Billion human beings say don't hurt our feelings by drawing cartoons (good or bad) of a person who is closer to our hearts than our own families and children, all the tolerance goes down the you know what.

Of course, to put abortion in such simple, black and white terms can be shocking to some — and many pro-abortion activists would disagree, saying that a child is not human or nor a person or does not possess rights, or some other such argument.

Did they kill the women and boys because of the known $ exual immorality and associated disease that riddled these tribes that offered their children as human sacrifice and $ ex toys?

I do not believe people would act that way as we have a long history of humans working together in social groups for survival relying on each other and taking care of sick and injured and protecting the weaker child bearing females in the group.

Friedrich Nietzsche expressed the point most provocatively: «As a father, God does not care enough about his children: human fathers do this better.

And these books don't serve up blind patriotism nor are they revisionist in scope — the stories put a human face on some of our most tragic moments and failures as a nation like Japanese internment, the plight of home children, residential schools, flu epidemics, wars, child labour, the Halifax explosion, the Acadian expulsion, and so on.

They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations in insurance claims for loss of body parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth of a human being, the lowered crime rate would not come near justifying the number of abortions.

Acts 17:24 - 28 «24 The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; 25 nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; 26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, 27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»»

... as you stated in another post «By inspiring the human authors to write what they did, God made it look like He was the one responsible for the actions of Israel, the destruction of the flood, the murder of the firstborn males of Israel, and the slaughter of Canaanite women and children.

The Intangible does not exist, but the Inquisition happened because of it, Galileo was thwarted, and human development set back therein, because of it, and how many other childrens» lives destroyed by this perversion of society because of it?

While we do not have anything like a final, scientific approach to maximizing human happiness, it seems safe to say that rap.ing and killing children will not be one of its primary consti.tuents.

If an unborn child is a human being, it doesn't belong to you, unless of course you believe in slavery.

Unlike the human parent, God does not stand by helplessly as the child fails to realize its potential.

R.a.p.ing a child is the lowest thing you can do as a human!

It has been the children of satan who always hav plans so that Christ in their eyes can not come back, and they use stupid plans and blow themelves up, and do all manner of evil, but GOD IS GOD AND NO HUMAN OR SATAN CAN BE VICTORIOUS OVER YHWVH OF ISRAEL.

I've seen humans as nothing more than highly evolved primates, but I've also seen them as made in the image of God; I've seen children suffering and been convinced there is no God, but I've also sensed God's presence as I've reached into that same suffering; I've convinced myself that doing whatever I wanted was the most exciting way to live, but I've also found abundant life in being humbly obedient to Jesus.

Their children didn't need to commit incest; they simply mixed with other groups of mortal humans outside Eden, who passed on the useful Neanderthal genes we inherited.

I don't believe that God loves little children more than other human beings.

Mohammed was just a self - styled stand - up prophet, child molester - pedophile who lived and died like any other human being; he did not resurrect like Jesus Christ.

A grieving parent's wish to replicate a dying child does not justify research into human cloning.

Bill, I feel sorry for you, you being a scientist and yet unable to create anything close to a human, or a constellation system, or a brain to think really logically with is amazing to me... if you want to believe that there was a big explosion somewhere in the universe beyond this world and that is how you came to be you can keep that theory but don't tell parents what to do with there children.

This attitude is at complete variance to that behind Natural Family Planning (NFP), wherein a couple who have reason to space their children accept the gift of sexuality exactly as it is stamped in the human person by God and do not treat their fertility as a problem to be expunged by technology.

I know there are going to be a bunch of people out there that scream that God can do anything and could create a sinless Child, but you can not ignore the HUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something other than human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the OriginalHUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something other than human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Originalhuman, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Originalhuman nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original Sin.

Its funny that you want to take my right as a human to defend myself with as much firepower as possible but you do nt want to «trample» the rights of women by not allowing them to have abortions which kill over a million children per year.

Funny how it doesn't say «No human child testing used.»

It does take two people, one male and one female, to make a human child.

I do not ever think this will be «morally acceptable» to us as long as we are humans and can relate to that parent or child, understanding that we are just like they are and through empathy and a chemical in our bodies called oxytocin we can walk a mile in their shoes and decide whether that promotes human growth (moral) or stunts it (immoral).

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

If as imperfect humans, we would condemn that action, why would we think that an all powerful, omniscient, intelligent, loving God would do such a thing to his children?

Getting back to children and humans — yes, I agree while religion is a way towards spirituality and helps in moral development, does this automatically mean that non-religion will lead to absence of spirituality and morality??? I can be good even if I do nt pray.

The feral child brought up by the wolves has a human body and originally a human brain, but it is not human: it does not have that distance from the world and other selves which is a necessary presupposition for its entering into relation with a Thou and becoming an I.