They help protect areas such as mangrove forests and seagrass beds that act as nurseries for marine animals, as well as
human coastal populations.
Not exact matches
They found that all 15
human impacts increased after 1978, even though
population growth remained constant, suggesting that economic growth contributed to
coastal ecosystem decline.
The use of stone tools by macaques in Thailand has reduced the size and
population density of
coastal shellfish; previously it was thought that tool - assisted overharvesting effects resulted uniquely from
human activity.
However I did look at what would happen after that in relative, rather than absolute time, by featuring not only changes in geography, but in chapter by chapter fashion looking at trends in
human population, agriculture,
coastal city infrastructure (all those buried wires!)
For example, mangroves are estimated to be worth at least US$ 1.6 billion each year in ecosystem services that support
coastal livelihoods and
human populations around the world *.
An ever increasing
coastal population means that the impact of the storms on
humans is much greater since so many people lose their homes and businesses.
But there are vast volumes of studies concluding that rising concentrations of greenhouse gases are already influencing the climate and will continue to raise the odds of fiercer floods, drier droughts and other disruptive changes, including a quickening pace of
coastal retreats (and all as
human populations soar in some of the world's most vulnerable places).
One thing is for sure, unless we address the really serious problem of
human infrastructure and
population the details of whether it's CO2 or not, or whether the
coastal mangrove will suvive, is moot.
My take is that the tug of war over what's causing today's telegenic heat waves, floods, tempests — and even Arctic sea - ice retreats — distracts from the high confidence scientists have in the long - term (but less sexy) picture: that more CO2 will lead to centuries of climate and
coastal changes with big consequences for a growing
human population (for better and worse in the short run, and likely mostly for the worse in the long run).
Under the worst case scenario, as to this blowout, is there a risk that certain
coastal areas will become uninhabitable or that certain aspects of the food and wildlife chains will be seriously impaired or pose a danger to the
human population?
Loss of Land — Half of the
human population lives in
coastal areas or already below sea level.
(1) to provide new and additional assistance from the United States to the most vulnerable developing countries, including the most vulnerable communities and
populations therein, in order to support the development and implementation of climate change adaptation programs and activities that reduce the vulnerability and increase the resilience of communities to climate change impacts, including impacts on water availability, agricultural productivity, flood risk,
coastal resources, timing of seasons, biodiversity, economic livelihoods, health and diseases, and
human migration; and
For instance, the large sea - level rise (up to 12 m) that would result from the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets would have major impacts on
coastal areas, with effects both on biological systems and
human populations.
Thus, through the foreseeable future (very optimistically 2085), other factors will continue to outweigh climate change with respect to
human welfare as characterized by (a) mortality for hunger, malaria and
coastal flooding, and (b)
population at risk for waters stress.
[2] This rise in sea levels around the world potentially affects
human populations in
coastal and island regions [3] and natural environments like marine ecosystems.
The poor condition of corals of the Florida Keys over the last three decades results from a combination of many factors, including effects of
human population through
coastal development, overfishing, ship groundings, and water quality degradation from terrestrial, marine, and atmospheric pollution (including temperature increases).
A recent example of misreporting are the «scientific» news stories based on a study's press release that increased ocean acidification, presumably from
human CO2 emissions, was dissolving the poor
coastal starfish
population.
Extreme weather events associated with climate change pose particular challenges to
human settlements, because assets and
populations in both developed and developing countries are increasingly located in
coastal areas, slopes, ravines and other risk - prone regions (Freeman and Warner, 2001; Bigio, 2003; UN-Habitat, 2003).