Sentences with phrase «human consumption so»

Not exact matches

The availability of pornography and the near universality of its consumption are today facts of human existence, at least in the West, and are likely to remain so.

They are: rationalization, which tends toward sterile intellectualization and robs life of its character and vitality; estheticism, which cuts off true communication by maintaining an esthetic distance in order to dominate, rather than to support, others; capitalism, which tends to deper - sonalize people by providing for their hedonistic needs in order to support production and consumption regardless of its human utility; and nationalism, which tends to make national things sacred and in doing so to create idols out of them.31.

But for so many of us in the produce industry doing our reasonable best to grow and ship a product that is safe for human consumption, being portrayed as «villians» in these scenarios is just ethically wrong.

Impregnating cows and taking their baby's from them so that the milk can be extracted for human use and consumption is the farthest thing from natural.

«Kangaroo meat is so far almost unrecognised as a significant game meat outside Australia, although there has been an export trade in game meat for human consumption since 1955.»

So the bivalves would help clean New York's polluted waters, and in a decade or two they might even be safe for human consumption.

They found that human needs, such as employment, utility consumption and housing, correspond directly with the population: As the number of people doubles so does the need for housing, jobs and electricity infrastructure, which encompasses the number of roads, gasoline stations and the like already in place and does not necessarily keep pace with individual growth — the ratio of user to facility simply rises.

In a study published Thursday in the journal Cell, the researchers shed light on the evolutionary history of these pathogens, which are fast developing resistance to even the so - called last - resort antibiotics, due to their high consumption among humans.

And I was not dissapointed by how clear cut his opinion was on the subject... In his article evidence on nut consumption and human health he goes so far as to call Dr. Esselstyn a reductionist for dissaproving the healthy fats from nuts and advocado's!

This is so totally opposite every other nutritionist's recommendations and hundreds, if not thousands, of years of human food consumption all over the world.

So at the end of the day, Hemp does not have therapeutic effects because of its low levels of THC and is totally safe for human consumption!

With consumption so common since the advent of agriculture, it's unlikely that gluten is unhealthy for humans.

Mirroring human consumption patterns, rats were given unlimited access to food we can find in every corner store — frosting, bacon, candy bars, donuts, sausage, hot dogs, snack cakes and so on.

Agricultural usage accounts for about 80 percent of all antibiotic use in the US, so it's a MAJOR source of human antibiotic consumption

In fact, agricultural usage accounts for about 80 percent of all antibiotic use in the US, 2 so it's a MAJOR source of human antibiotic consumption.

Life has spent about 3.8 billion years on Earth, and its ecosystems are organized through strategies based on constant trial and error, hence we can learn many lessons for the building of a new human evolutionary phase capable of ending poverty, hunger, inequality between countries, gender inequality, irresponsible consumption, unsustainable industrialization, pollution of the seas and oceans, and so on.

In Figure 2, it can be seen that in Circular Economy, natural resources, which are used as primary raw materials in the manufacturing process, are transformed into products for human consumption that will generate solid waste that, after it became a secondary raw material, it's used in manufacturing products, and so on.

So yes I do think the consumption of horror satisfies a base need we have as humans.

In fact, so good is their quality that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has labeled it fit for even human consumption!

I found that very reassuring... I'm not even sure all foods for human consumption are tested quite so thoroughly.

And rightly so: unlike animals used for entertainment, research and cosmetic testing, and other forms human consumption, most of the American public has a shared reverence and respect for companion animals like cats and dogs.

In working with so - called trash, Larson is exploring the story behind it — and raising questions about human consumption.

What matters most is adjusting the human population size and patterns of consumption to the requirements of Earth's life support systems, and doing so in a way that does away with gross economic, racial, gender and other inequities.

The leaders in my not - so - great generation wish to live without having to accept limits to growth of seemingly endless economic globalization, increasing per capita consumption and skyrocketing human population numbers; their desires are evidently insatiable; they choose to believe anything that is politically convenient, economically expedient and socially agreeable; and they act accordingly.

Which then leads to a very different characterization of the problem in which carbon emissions are really just a by - product of a cheap energy consumerist society, and the problem isn't to reduce emissions, it is to restructure our entire societies (and our conceptions of them) so that we no longer depend on growth in resource consumption as our definition of human progress.

The point you are trying to make is so vital, so incredibly significant, that I would hope others could be encouraged to set their subjective discomforts aside, to put their ignorance and / or denial of reality aside, and acknowledge the ominously looming, human - driven predicament before humanity, the one apparently induced by the huge scale and skyrocketing growth rate of global human over consumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities now overspreading the surface of the wondrous planetary home upon which God has blessed us to live so well.

Perhaps leaders are now called upon to lead by reasonably and sensibly limiting the global growth of human numbers, per capita consumption and endlessly expanding production capabitities so that we find a balanced relationship with nature and, consequently, give this marvelous planetary home God has blessed us to inhabit the time it requires for self - renewal.

Those of us who put our feet where our mouths are, and visa - versa, have been living simply for decades, and, in my case have realised that very few are following, in fact things are going in the other direction, so the question is, how do we minimise the damage whilst we lack the influence to significantly change the growth / consumption philosophy (which is natural, but in humans has too much power behind it for safety) of society at large.

They could paralyze modern society, which has become so dependent on abundant water supplies for agriculture, energy generation, human consumption and other uses.

Being the arbiters of human fertility, consumption and production — the check on human nature — Lee and Ince can only imagine so many mouths to feed, which each want more and more and more.

Typically as human populations and per - capita consumption of natural resources increase, so do the negative impacts on Earth unless the activities and technologies involved are engineered otherwise.

To the degree to which there are fixed physical boundaries to human consumption, they are so theoretical as to be functionally irrelevant.

Global Environmental Change General Contributions II, starting at 1:40 pm, I'll be examining the null hypothesis that humans are not the cause of the rise in temperature that happens to merely correlate by pure accident so perfectly with the rise in population and the CDIAC's 250 years of fossil fuel consumption records.

So if we can feed the fish on plant - based foods that would not otherwise be fit for human consumption - especially if those foods can be grown in ponds with minimal input from us, then we are on our way toward a sustainable system.

Oh, and the picture of the product, which has been treated with so many chemicals to make it look good on the camera that it's unfit for human consumption.

Android doesn't have that luxury; Google added cross-platform fingerprint APIs in Marshmallow, but there's no equivalent for iris or face recognition, so unless I use the fingerprint sensor on the S8 or Note 8, I have to manually enter my not - fit - for - human - consumption password every time.