Sentences with phrase «human embryos because»

Some people have moral objections to doing any research on human embryos because they consider a human embryo to have the moral standing of a person.

Those against stem - cell research using human embryos because they believe it destroys human life are, for the most part, also against the blending of species because they believe it degrades human life.

Unlike OCT4, these genes can only be studied in human embryos because they are not expressed the same way, or at all, in mouse embryos or immortalized lines of human stem cells, says her colleague Robin Lovell - Badge, also at the Crick Institute.

Not exact matches

An embryo is NOT a human life because of its complete dependence on another life.

Well it seems like Ivan can relax, Michael Peroski has just solved all of our problems: Proceeding from ideology - driven inquiry entails starting from an answer: «Research on human embryonic stem cell should be forbidden because embryos are equivalent to human lives» and working....

Other people regard an embryo in the early weeks of pregnancy as not deserving of unqualified protection because, before we feel it to be human, we feel an obligation to spare the human - that - is - to - be unnecessary pain.

The court reasoned that the treaty's drafters were actually concerned only to protect life from the moment of implantation, and that the human embryo is not a person under the American Convention because it is not a person under certain treaties elsewhere in the world.

The hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) hormone is a remarkable molecule, which is very unusual because it is produced only by the cells that will become the placenta of the developing embryo (trophoblast cells).

Former Senator Rick Santorum (R — PA) is a strong backer of adult stem - cell research, and opposed to embryonic stem - cell research because he views destruction of embryos as destruction of human life.

The genome - editing technique earned top honors, in part because of achievements such as «the creation of a long - sought «gene drive» that could eliminate pests or the diseases they carry, and the first deliberate editing of the DNA of human embryos.»

Perhaps because it is normal for human embryos to contain cells with the wrong number of chromosomes, which can cause them to self - destruct.

Anti-abortion groups oppose such treatments because hESCs can usually be obtained only by destroying a human embryo.

We employ similar pathways to shape our parts as embryos, but over the course of evolution, humans may have lost the ability to tap into it as adults, perhaps because the cell division required for regeneration elevated the likelihood of cancer.

«Understanding how gene editing works in human embryos will require research in human embryos,» because mouse embryos, for example, have species - specific developmental differences, notes Dana Carroll, a biochemistry professor at the University of Utah who researches CRISPR.

Because of the legislation, a FDA spokesperson noted in an email, «the agency will not receive or review INDs [Investigational New Drug applications] for human subject research utilizing genetic modification of embryos for the prevention of transmission of mitochondrial disease in FY 2016 and human subject research using these technologies can not be conducted in compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and FDA's implementing regulations.»

Opponents of research on human embryos might contend that reprogramming happened because of the federal restrictions on embryonic research, but Thomson believes the stigma on the field made researchers wary and delayed the discovery of reprogramming by several years.

To Daley, the delays caused by the Bush administration's opposition to stem cell research are as much of an ethical issue as the handling of human embryos themselves, because it actively impedes progress on research that might benefit millions of Americans.

But the summit's organizers concluded that actually trying to produce a human pregnancy from such modified germ cells or embryos, either through in vitro fertilization (IVF) with the sperm or eggs or the implantation of an embryo, is currently «irresponsible» because of ongoing safety concerns and a lack of societal consensus.

I don't think we need the same level of regulation as for human embryonic stem cells, for example, because we are not using any embryos.

Because fertilized human embryos are far more accessible than unfertilized eggs, which can not be frozen and stored, extending the result to humans could lower the practical barriers against creating human embryonic stem cells to study and potentially treat disease.

Stem cells obtained from human embryos seem to offer the best chance of new therapies, because unlike other stem cells they have the ability to morph into almost any type of tissue.

Some bioethicists have called for a new international ban that would clearly prohibit the implantation of a human clone in part because of the tantalizing research uses for nascent embryos.

The law signed by Davis was immediately assailed by antiabortion and religious groups, most of which maintain that stem - cell research is repugnant because human embryos must be created to supply the cells, then destroyed to harvest them.

But the measure faced potent opposition from antiabortion activists, the Catholic church and fiscal conservatives, because it would pay for research on discarded human embryos and increase the state's debt.

Almost immediately, groups ranging from the President's Council on Bioethics to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops assailed Hwang's work, either because cloned embryos were destroyed in the process or because his research could lead to cloning humans.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells, harvested from three - and - a-half-day-old mouse embryos or five - and - a-half-day-old human embryos, are referred to as pluripotent because they can become any of the thousands of cell types in the body.

Still, many medical researchers insist that the cloning of human embryos continue because the tissue derived from stem cells might treat diseases ranging from diabetes to Parkinson's.

Although a clause in the law that funds NIH prevents the agency from funding research that would harm or destroy an embryo, a lawyer at the Department of Health and Human Services ruled in 1999 that because stem cells — which can grow ad infinitum in culture — are not themselves embryos, the NIH could fund work with cells that were derived by privately funded researchers or researchers overseas.

Other Chinese groups had previously reported editing human embryos that could not develop into a baby because they carried extra chromosomes, but this is the first report involving viable embryos (SN Online: 4/8/16; SN Online: 4/23/15).

However, the work is controversial because the cells are derived from week - old human embryos.

But the favored reprogramming technique, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), otherwise known as research cloning, is fraught with ethical pitfalls as well as technical difficulties because it entails creating a human embryo by inserting an adult cell nucleus into an ooctye.

Closely watched The HFEA application is likely to be closely watched by researchers around the world, because the regulator has a global reputation for careful but progressive regulation of human - embryo work.

Because embryos are not destroyed to create them, they have been hailed as a way out of the ethical dilemma posed by human embryonic stem cells.

Currently, such experiments can not be done with federal funding in the United States because of a congressional prohibition on using taxpayer funds for research that destroys human embryos.

And because the federal government is not permitted to fund any research on human embryos, work on in vitro fertilisation has already moved to private laboratories.

That still makes them a potential source of ES cells, and because human parthenote embryos can't develop to term, some people have fewer qualms about using them to produce stem cells.

Because polar bodies are dispensable for human embryonic development, they can be safely removed without harming the embryo.

But the process means that US scientists - already stymied by years of government funding freezes linked to controversy over the destruction of human embryos - often find themselves blocked because other universities or private companies have already secured exclusive rights.

PERSON 2: It is unethical to destroy human embryos for the purposes of research because doing so destroys human embryos that are human beings and could otherwise have developed and grown like every other human being.

The zebrafish is a good choice because of its similarity to humans as a vertebrate, its transparency as an embryo, and the powerful genetic tools available in this model organism.

At first blush, these words, known as the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, might appear to prohibit government funding of ESC research altogether, because ESC research necessarily involves the destruction of human embryos.

To determine how valid the objection against funding of human embryonic stem cell research is because of its use of human embryos, it's important to understand two key aspects of hESCs» unique biology and derivation.

Because the cells were derived from human embryos or fetal tissue, pro-life groups condemned embryonic stem cell research as morally wrong.

But, by then, human embryonic stem cells had lost some of their controversial edge, because scientists really had developed an alternative source of cells that reduced the need for material from human embryos.

He did so because a very strong case can be made that the guidelines violate a statutory ban (known as the Dickey - Wicker Amendment) on the use of federal funds to support «research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed.»

«It fell out of favor because the chicken doesn't have a placenta, but the data shows that if you are looking at a direct teratogenic assault on an embryo, that chicken embryo model is a great model, with a high degree of predictability of what happens in humans,» Bushdid said.

Under the proposed NIH policy, taxpayer funds would be allowed for experiments in which human cells are added to early - stage embryos of all animals except nonhuman primates, such as chimpanzees and monkeys, because they are so similar to humans.

But stem cells are a hot political topic, because researching stem cells from human embryos typically involves destroying those embryos.

However, some consider human embryonic stem cell research controversial because, in some cases, the new stem cell lines are derived frozen human embryos that have been donated for research.

«This actually opens the door to start to look at this for the first time, because we could not do this at all previously in the human embryo.