Thus a science - trained professional might «believe in»
human evolution when he or she is engaged in professional tasks that depend on the truth of that theory, yet still disbelieve in
human evolution when he or she is acting as a member of a religious community, in which such disbelief enables her to both experience membership in and loyalty to such a community and to express the same.
John Hawks is in the middle of explaining his research on
human evolution when he drops a bombshell.
Not exact matches
Or, as Christine Bader describes in her book The
Evolution of a Corporate Idealist:
When Girl Meets Oil, corporations including her former employers at BP may well be «advancing
human rights in some ways while compromising them in others.»
When I ask them, «How many of you think something in addition to
evolution accounts for
humans being on earth as we now exist?»
As opposed to
evolution that gives guesses and hypothesis, the 1st chapter of Genesis lays out how the earth was prepared for
human habitation, in a logical, coherent and chronological way, just as
when a builder lays the foundation for a home and proceeds to build it in an orderly fashion.
actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us
humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy,
when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago
when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated
evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang
When, for example, at first in the 19th century down to Pius XII the Church adopted a very reserved attitude to any inclusion of the
human bios in the idea of
evolution, that was motivated, and rightly so, by a fundamental conception of the nature of man which for good reasons required to be defended.
Finally,
when it comes to the
evolution of
human, I think that Mark Twain had it right
when he said that apes are descended from man.
the most convincing evidence of God of panthrotheism is the scientific proof of the Big bang, becasue after billions of years of
evolution when we
humans developed cosnsciousness we began to think of Him, God is the source of everything and all religions.
Christians, however, may understand the decisiveness of Christ as the moment in
evolution when God's promise and self - gift, which have been continually and creatively present to the cosmos from its birth, are embraced by a
human being without reservation.
For Bergson, like many process thinkers (Peirce, James and Dewey come particularly to mind), the entire concept of «necessity» only makes sense
when applied internally to abstractions the intellect has already devised.11 Of course, one can tell an evolutionary story about how the
human intellect came to be a separable function of consciousness that emphasizes abstraction (indeed, that is what Bergson does in Creative
Evolution), but if one were to say that the course of development described in that story had to occur (i.e., necessarily) as it did, then one would be very far from Bergson's view (CE 218, 236, 270).
You think that
human beings are merely the products of blind, uncaring,
evolution but
when it comes to
human reason (a product of the same process) we can believe in it without question!
A new type of man indeed,
when we consider that, less than two hundred years ago, the notion of an organic
evolution of the World in Time had acquired neither form nor substance in the
human mind.
And because the underlying commitment is philosophical, the flimsiest facts are counted as evidence - as
when the president of the National Academy of Sciences recently published an article arguing that
evolution is confirmed by differences in the size of finch beaks, as though the sprawling evolutionary drama from biochemicals to the
human brain could rest on instances of trivial, limited variation.
All this makes possible,
when combined with the resurrection of Christ, the emergence of a «transformed
human community» which is «the next stage in the emergent
evolution of the world, and the incarnation of the divine Word» (LG 74).
Religion will cease to be the driving influence of humanity only
when 400 millions years of
evolution of the primitive parts of the
human brain is removed.
Atheists keep trying to apply scientifc rules of evidence where they don't belong — to matters of
human affairs — yet are perfectly content to throw away the same rules
when it suits their purposes (e.g.,
evolution).
You can do so much better than to resort to such stock canards as «If
humans evolved from monkeys
when you know full well what the theory of
evolution says regarding the multiple species of primates.
If you follow the
evolution of
human society per the theory of the early philosophers: Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau; it is posited that
when humans decided to move from a state of survival of the fittest in which they roamed in the bush mainly in small family groups and decided to settle in larger societal groups, they needed rules and regulations to order society.
Today, researchers at the annual meeting of AAAS (which publishes Science), previewed data from a recent poll showing that
when the word «
human» is replaced with «elephant» in the
evolution question, 75 % of Americans agree — about 25 percentage points higher than before.
Some researchers think stone tools can answer the big questions in
human evolution: How do we differ from other primates and
when did our unique
human traits emerge?
When we look at
human evolution in this new way, it's going to be much more productive.
ASU mathematical epidemiologist Carlos Castillo - Chavez of the School of
Human Evolution and Social Change in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences says, «
When we compared the temporal patterns in these data to the patterns in the number of Ebola - related news stories that ran on major news networks, we found that the peaks and valleys in both almost exactly matched.
When the team compared these scans with those of the skulls of Homo sapiens from temperate regions, they found Neanderthals» sinuses were only bigger because they had bigger faces; the two species» sinuses had the same relative size relationship (Journal of
Human Evolution, DOI: 10.1016 / j.jhevol.2010.10.003).
Human activities could change the pace of
evolution, similar to what occurred 66 million years ago
when a giant asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs, leaving modern birds as their only descendants.
The study resulted from a collaboration that developed
when Gómez - Robles spent a semester at IU studying with Polly while she was a graduate student at the National Research Centre for
Human Evolution and at the University of Granada, both in Spain.
For example, MCPH1 and ASPM cause microcephaly
when mutated, FOXP2 causes speech defects, and all three show signs of selection pressure during
human, but not chimp,
evolution.
When humans are involved, selection pressures on a species often become very strong, leading to fast
evolution.
When they measured the concentrations in the same area in chimp brains, the team found that the differences between chimps and normal
humans were much greater for those nine than for the 12 metabolites not implicated in schizophrenia, suggesting that energy pathways implicated in schizophrenia were also altered by
human evolution, the team reports this week in Genome Biology.
This approach allowed them to determine
when HSV - 1 and HSV - 2 were introduced into
humans with far more precision than standard models that do not account for natural selection over the course of viral
evolution.
When the Ice Age ended, about 15,000 years ago, population began to climb again, setting the stage for a major turning point in
human evolution.
The discovery that frogs have cushy kneecaps pushes back the
evolution of this feature, and hints at why they don't incur as much injury as
humans do
when jumping
The findings could help explain the
evolution of our
human desire to seek out «local knowledge»
when visiting a new place or culture.
Any RNA,
when in a complex with another oligoribonucleotide known as an external guide sequence (EGS), can become a substrate for ribonuclease P. Simulation of
evolution in vitro was used to select EGSs that bind tightly to a target substrate messenger RNA and that increase the efficiency of cleavage of the target by
human ribonuclease P to a level equal to that achieved with natural substrates.
«Although autonomy - establishing behavior is clearly of value in modern Western society, in which daily survival threats are minimal, it may have become linked to stress reactions over the course of
human evolution,
when separation from the larger
human pack was likely to bring grave danger,» Allen and colleagues write.
Regardless of
when exactly humankind managed to make fire a regular presence in their lives, scientists agree it was a turning point in
human evolution.
The genomic data is important, say researchers, because it serves as a key reference point for
when and where the parasite existed in
humans, and provides more information about the
evolution of
human disease.
When Reich entered college, in 1992, most of what scientists knew about
human evolution came from fossils.
This is the famous site of Dmanisi, Georgia, which offers an unparalleled glimpse into a harsh early chapter in
human evolution,
when primitive members of our genus Homo struggled to survive in a new land far north of their ancestors» African home, braving winters without clothes or fire and competing with fierce carnivores for meat.
With the honeyguides» help, the Hadza found hives about 58 % of the time, more than twice as often as
when foraging alone, researchers report in a paper in press at
Evolution and
Human Behavior.
«The view has long been held that this trait evolved during the course of
human evolution,
when our ancestors were facing a prolonged period of warfare, as parochialism increases group cohesion and cooperation against opposing factions.
Rewiring gene activity in
humans happened, in part,
when transposons inserted themselves into the genomes of
human ancestors after the split from chimpanzees, he reported last year in Genome Biology and
Evolution.
In the course of
evolution, some animals have overcome the fear and stress they feel
when encountering
humans or unfamiliar members of their own species and become less aggressive.
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, who began to be interested in the role of cooperation in
evolution since 2011, when he published a controversial paper titled «Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how human competition, for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals an
evolution since 2011,
when he published a controversial paper titled «
Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how human competition, for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals an
Evolution is a cooperative process: the biodiversity - related niches differentiation theory (BNDT) can explain» concluded: «These theoretical findings, confirmed by empirical approaches, should motivate our species to think before it is too late about how
human competition, for the first time in the history of life on Earth, has been systematically leading to the extinction of animals and plants.
The notion that
humans got to a point in evolutionary history
when their bodies were somehow «in sync» with the environment, and that at some time after that point — whether due to the advent of agriculture, the invention of the bow and arrow, or the availability of the hamburger — we went astray from those roots reflects a misunderstanding of
evolution.
When it comes to
human evolution, Europe and the Near East are crucial places: Europe has the first cave art, and the Near East has the first sightings of modern
humans out of Africa, for example.
And 30 years ago,
when the field of evolutionary psychology was gaining steam, some facile parallels between ancient and modern behaviors lodged themselves in the popular conceptions of
human evolution.
Our knowledge of hominid
evolution — that is,
when and how
humans evolved away from the great ape family tree — has significantly increased in recent years, aided by unearthed fossils from Ethiopia, including the C. abyssinicus, a species of great ape.
As more Y chromosome mutations are discovered, he says, researchers will be able to paint an ever higher resolution picture of
human prehistory — the
when, where, and Y of
human evolution.
The famous
human relative known as «Lucy» has reigned alone as queen of an important time and place in
human evolution: Ethiopia about 3.2 million years ago, roughly the time
when the first stone tools appear in East Africa.