Complete
human extinction strikes the author as unlikely due to our «unique combination of intelligence and a strong survival instinct.
Not exact matches
Reading Pierre Trudeau's remarks today, I'm
struck by his foresight on issues like protection of fragile Arctic landscapes, and the capability of
humans to push our species and others into
extinction.
Shermer's article is a shallow and tendentious treatment of a complex subject that does not take proper account of rebuttals to critical attacks on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, in which a comet
strike more than 12,000 years ago caused the megafaunal
extinction in North America, and misrepresents the state of the argument around my theory that this event wiped out an advanced
human society as well.
And while previous
extinctions have been driven by natural planetary transformations or catastrophic asteroid
strikes, the current die - off can be associated to
human activity, a situation that the lead author Rodolfo Dirzo, a professor of biology at Stanford, designates an era of «Anthropocene defaunation.»
The researchers looked at the pattern of
extinctions for 177 species of mammals weighing 10 kilograms or more between 132,000 years ago (the height of the next - to - last ice age to
strike the Northern Hemisphere) and 1000 years ago (a time at which the ecological effects of
human exploration and expansion became unquestionable).
Much as I sypathize with your frustration Ms Goldman, I think that the meteor
strike of 60 million years ago (along with whatever the cause of the other half - dozen mass
extinctions) qualifies as a worse thing that
human excess — at least so far.