Your cat might be fuzzy but her skin is more sensitive to hot and cold than
human flesh so tepid water works best.
Not exact matches
Digital technologies have
so thoroughly disrupted physical distribution that it's often a mystery just how to connect to the
flesh - and - blood
humans who would buy and use your product.
In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word became
flesh,
so yes, my Deity was
human and understand our weakness, though He was without sin.
Through our thoughts and our
human experiences, we long ago became aware of the strange properties which make the universe
so like our
flesh:
Just as Jesus took on
human flesh, became a man, and died a criminal's death,
so also God took on
human actions and events that made Him look guilty.
Only
so is God able, through sharing our
human flesh in the Incarnation, to impart eternal life to that
flesh, rather than succumbing to our death and being extinguished by it.
Christ is no longer the God who took on
human flesh that he might be scourged and scorned, and
so bring the body into glory.
Because
humans are
so weak in their love,
so easily distracted,
so fearful of love's sacrifice, God Himself had to strengthen the weak vessel of
flesh by taking fleshupon Himself and showing of what it is capable.
Suffice it to say that it reached its culmination,
so far as scriptural witness is concerned, in the affirmation that in Christ the Word (the self - expressive creative Activity which is divine in nature) «became
flesh and dwelt among us,» while in formal theological statement the climax was the declaration that in him there is a genuine union of divine Activity («true God») and
human activity like our own («true
human being»).
There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly
human, bone of our bone and
flesh of our
flesh, living a
human life under the same
human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure
human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him,
so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it,
so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.
So then, remember that at one time you Gentiles by birth, called «the uncircumcision» by those who are called «the circumcision» — a physical circumcision made in the
flesh by
human hands — remember that you were at that time without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.
Since therefore Christ suffered in the
flesh, arm yourselves also with the same intention (for whoever has suffered in the
flesh has finished with sin),
so as to live for the rest of your earthly life no longer by
human desires but by the will of God.
This view of preaching is incarnational: as The Word came in the
flesh,
so the Word comes in the form of
human speech.
Only
so can the priest challenge more intimately, and love with a depth not subject to the veto of family jealousies those who, to speak in an analogy with Christ, are born through baptism «not out of
human stock, or urge of the
flesh, or will of man, but of God himself».
You hold the firmest convictions about Our Lord; believing him to be truly «of David's line in his manhood», yet Son of God by the divine will and power; truly born of a virgin; baptised by John «for his fulfilling of all righteousness»; and in the days of Pontius Pilate and Herod the Tetrarch truly pierced by nails in his
human flesh (a fruit imparting life to us from his most blessed passion),
so that by his resurrection he might set up a beacon for all time to call together his saints and believers, whether Jews or Gentiles, in the one bodyof his Church» (Smyrna I, 1 - 6).
If a finely - tuned robot could mimic all
human behaviors (including reporting what would be pain if it were
human), then the mechanical naturalists would have proved their point that the brain is nothing more than computerized
flesh» or
so they claim.
Therefore, if Jesus had a truly
human body, then it must have been evil or sinful, and if
so, then Jesus was accursed and died as a sinful
human in the
flesh so that God could set Him free into the spiritual realm.
It is not about eating nothing for a period of time, but about eating little or modestly,
so that the
human flesh gets subdued a little.
So then to call Jesus the Logos is to say that he is the mind of God, become a
flesh and blood
human creature.
And
so Old Adam still will have his day As celebrant at feasts some people keep For
flesh and blood that never wake from sleep, This bread and wine of
human show and play.
Just as Jesus took on
human flesh with all its weaknesses and limitations,
so also God, in the Old Testament «incarnated» Himself into the affairs of humanity with all of our weaknesses and limitations.
That the Word became
flesh,
so that Jesus has
flesh, blood and a
human soul, as well as divinity.
But when He came in the
flesh, He wanted to fully understand what it was like to be
human, and
so He had to give up certain aspects that would interfere with being
human.
It is important to note that Jesus» blood, which ushers in the New Covenant, is what reconciles Gentiles to God as they never had a relationship with Him: Ephesians 2:11 - 19 Therefore remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the
flesh, who are called «Uncircumcision» by the
so - called «Circumcision,» which is performed in the
flesh by
human hands — remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.
Common to many of them and to Greek thought was a dualism which regarded matter, including
flesh, as evil and sought to emancipate the
human soul from it and
so to achieve immortality.
If Christians truly believe the ineffable» mystery of God» took on
human flesh, became the definitive translation» living Word» of this mystery
so beyond us, yet present to us in the living Word and» translation» of Jesus Christ, then our knowing or not knowing is never an endless seeking, but a finding not exhausted of its meaning during our time of earthly existence.
«We recognise that just as all truth rests in the Word of God, through whom all things were made and through Whom all thing will come to their completion,
so too the construction of a true
human ecology can only be achieved in relationship to the Word -LSB-...] we can see and sense the echoing of that eternally spoken Word in
so much of the created world around us -LSB-... which Word is] expressed in all those actions and events which make up the history of salvation -LSB-...] we recognise most centrally that this eternal Word of God, in whom all things makes sense, finds
flesh in the person of Jesus of Nazareth who then becomes its fullest expression and true presence in the world -LSB-...] the centre of true
human ecology is the person of Christ.»
Peter said, «
So, since Christ suffered in the
flesh, you also arm yourselves with the same attitude, because the one who has suffered in the
flesh has finished with sin, in that he spends the rest of his time on earth concerned about the will of God and not
human desires.»
In the case of
humans, these would likely come from the recipient,
so all the
flesh would be their own.
The near - infrared light that causes the nanotubes to fluoresce can penetrate about eight centimeters into
human tissue,
so physicians could potentially shine the light through skin and
flesh to look for fluorescence from nanotubes signaling the presence of cancer cells.
The lead character in Santa Clarita Diet feels the urge to constantly eat
human flesh and, impulsively, she does
so, while her husband tries to help her adjust to the changes by helping her out with whatever she needs.
What the movie needs is a director, and what it gets instead is Pitof, a French visual - effects maestro
so much fonder of technological wizardry than of
human flesh that he manages to turn even his slinky, sinuous star attraction into a digitized synthespian frolicking about endless CGI cityscapes.
And while Hannah's traumas are authentically dramatized, she's forced to endure
so many indignities that, in total, she occasionally comes across as a symbolic vessel for an important message, rather than a
flesh - and - blood
human being.
What we are meant to «do» with this precious gift of life, our highest destiny and the final stage of
human development, is to take massive quantities of drugs
so that we can all leave our mortal
flesh behind and evolve into glittery disco flash drives.
But just when Eigil's vegetarianism and love of animals seems bound to reveal the truth about Svend & Co, the script pulls a fast one and his presence ends up jeopardising Bjarne's budding romance with Astrid (Kruse), a local girl whose uncle just
so happens to have eaten
human flesh before (yes, really).
I hate to keep bringing up another movie but with End of Watch the characters were
so fleshed out and
human.
What kind of beast could slash and tear
so gruesomely at
human flesh and take out an entire inn full of robust men and the fiercest guard dogs?
So who do they all appear to fragment or to extend
human flesh?
But how about eliminating the billions of animals bred just
so humans can gobble their
flesh!