Sentences with phrase «human footprints on»

Karelin et al (2017) «Human footprints on greenhouse gas fluxes in cryogenic ecosystems» This paper presents no evidence on the subject being concerned with direct human impacts on CH4 emissions (which it says will result in a decrease in CH4 emissions).

Human footprints on greenhouse gas fluxes in cryogenic ecosystems https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1028334X17120133

In 2013, at Happisburgh on the eastern coast of England, wave action revealed human footprints on a tidal mud flat beside an eroding cliff.

FOOT FALL Human footprints on a Canadian island date to around 13,000 years ago.

Yeah this coming from the same crowd that includes Sarah Palin who believes the earth is 6000 years old and dinosaurs and humans co-existed because she saw a dinosaur footprint and a human footprint on the same fossil!

And what adult can forget Monday, July 20, 1969, at 10:56 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, the moment when Neil Armstrong placed the first human footprint on the moon - «one giant leap for mankind!»

No favorite yet because this is the first pregnancy my husband has agreed to try cloth diapers — thank you Human Footprint on Natn't Geo (if I recall correctly)!

«Social and economic equality empowers societies to engage in sustainable pathways, which includes, by the way, not only the sustainable use of natural resources but also slowing down population growth, to actively diminish the human footprint on the environment.»

Even in our high - tech times, which recently have been dubbed the era of anthropocene — the irreversible human footprint on earth — nature is indispensable.

With climate change, as with ozone depletion, the human footprint on Earth is apparent.

I didn't yet watch the entire session, but I'm wondering if anyone made a case regarding the lack of any long term worsening trend in climate change related issues (sea level rise, glacier melt, tropical systems, floods, extreme drought, tornadoes, etc) comparing pre 1950 (the consensus view of the birth of any potentially observable human footprint on GW) to post 1950?

The consensus of climate science is that CO2 had not yet risen enough prior to somewhere in the 1950's --» 70's such that they expect to be able to see — to observe — any measurable human footprint on GT's, hence the beginning of some potential AGW.

Not a single one of them suggests any human footprint on GT's prior to 1950 (well, except NASA's intro statement).

Based on the results, we suggest that human footprint on soil greenhouse gases fluxes is comparable to the effect of climate change at an annual to decadal timescales.

Human footprint on methane exchange between soil and atmosphere is mediated by drainage.

By removing natural and stray light sources, researchers have provided a clearer picture of the human footprint on Earth.

Certain UN plans, you know the one that has an «Agenda» direct people out of the rural areas into urban areas to limit human footprint on earth.

Is not the general «consensus» that there is really no observable — potentially measurable human footprint on GW until somewhere between 1950 and the mid to late 1970's; the period in which the rise in AGHG's really took off?

«But this could become a problem in more places as human footprint on the landscape grows.»

I hope the center continues to run at the inspired rate it has been — drastic measures like this very well may be what's needed to slow the growing human footprint on Galapagos.

Dedicated to reduction of human footprint on planet without bankrupting the people to get there.

Not exact matches

They tell us that they have arrived at an unshakable conviction, not based on inference but on immediate experience, that God is a spirit with whom the human spirit can hold intercourse; that in him meet all that they can imagine of goodness, truth, and beauty that they can see his footprints everywhere in nature, and feel his presence within them as the very life of their life, so that in proportion as they come to themselves they come to him.

The directive I am signing today will refocus America's space program on human exploration and discovery... This time we will not only plant our flag and leave our footprint.

Suzanne of Mommy Footprint shares a very interesting post on Self Cleaning Ovens — Toxic For Humans or Only Birds?

«13,000 - year - old human footprints found off Canada's Pacific coast: New evidence of human population living on the west coast of Canada at the end of last ice age.»

Impressions left by a large claw on the innermost toe on the dinosaur's front foot (the analog of the human thumb) indicate that the still - unknown species was located near the base of the sauropod family tree, and the sizes of the footprints — in some cases 70 centimeters across — suggest that the behemoths grew to reach 15 meters in length and weighed up to 10 metric tons, the researchers report online today in the Scottish Journal of Geology.

«13,000 - year - old human footprints found off Canada's Pacific coast: New evidence of human population living on the west coast of Canada at the end of last ice age.»

Beach excavations on Canada's Calvert Island revealed 29 distinct human footprints (dark brown in this illustration of one excavation site) from around 13,000 years ago.

Using a unique GPS - tracking database of 803 individuals across 57 species, we found that movements of mammals in areas with a comparatively high human footprint were on average one - half to one - third the extent of their movements in areas with a low human footprint.

Archaeologists working on the eastern coast of England have found a series of footprints that were made by human ancestors sometime between one million and 780,000 years ago.

The earliest human footprints outside of Africa have been uncovered, on the English coast, by a team of scientists led by Queen Mary University of London, the British Museum and the Natural History Museum.

Global Footprint is the size of human impact on Earth's natural resources.

According to that measure, our footprint has outgrown the planet on which we tread: humans now use 1.5 Earths to support our well - being.

WHEN did humans stamp our footprint on the planet?

The oldest human footprints ever found in North America, over 13,000 years old, were discovered on the shores of Calvert Island.

In the last week we've seen new peer - reviewed science published, linking at least half of 2012's extreme weather events to a human carbon footprint in the atmosphere and on the weather and climate.

Along with archival footage there are interviews with the astronauts who had the singular privilege of being the only humans to leave footprints on another world.

One of these data concerns the ecological footprint that is a good way to measure the impact of human beings on planet Earth.

During all this time, natural ecosystems have developed in co-evolution, but 250 years ago, with the development and industrialization models imposed by the West on the world, anthropogenic action is causing a major ecological and social footprint, hence the urgency to formulate international policies that circumscribe human economic activities within the biophysical limits of Mother Earth.

The canine sport of tracking involves training a dog to follow the human scent left in the tracklayer's footprints to locate articles containing the tracklayer's scent which have been dropped at certain locations on the track.

Because of this, the islands are considered the one place on the planet where the human footprint must be kept to a minimum.

With our current fixation on rising sea levels, forced migration of island nations, and ocean acidification, we are reminded that the human footprint is indelibly recorded on planet Earth.

Footprint August 1 - September 10, 2020 This juried exhibition will feature artworks that visualize the human (or other) footprint on thiFootprint August 1 - September 10, 2020 This juried exhibition will feature artworks that visualize the human (or other) footprint on thifootprint on this planet.

An analysis that gauges our impact on the planet's biological systems, the ecological footprint measures human consumption of natural resources in comparison to Earth's ecological capacity to regenerate them.

Let's face it, because no one will: it all comes down to halting human population growth, then slowly shrinking it back to a level where other species have breathing room, and we have a smaller energy footprint on the earth.

Other aspects of global warming's broad footprint on the world's ecosystems include changes in the abundance of more than 80 percent of the thousands of species included in population studies; major poleward shifts in living ranges as warm regions become hot, and cold regions become warmer; major increases (in the south) and decreases (in the north) of the abundance of plankton, which forms the critical base of the ocean's food chain; the transformation of previously innocuous insect species like the Aspen leaf miner into pests that have damaged millions of acres of forest; and an increase in the range and abundance of human pathogens like the cholera - causing bacteria Vibrio, the mosquito - borne dengue virus, and the ticks that carry Lyme disease - causing bacteria.

The growth of the ecological footprint of a human population about to increase from 7B now to 9B in 2050 raises serious concerns about how to live both more efficiently and with less permanent impacts on the finite world.

In the last week we've seen new peer - reviewed science published, linking at least half of 2012's extreme weather events to a human carbon footprint in the atmosphere and on the weather and climate.

In the Anthropocene, fossil fuels have become central to the geological footprint humans will leave behind on Earth.

Despite Blomqvist et al.'s reservations, Footprint results show that: (1) most countries are in ecological deficit, increasingly dependent on potentially unreliable trade in biocapacity; (2) humanity is at or beyond global carrying capacity for key categories of consumption, particularly agriculture (factoring in soil loss and ecosystem degradation would reveal additional deficits); (3) global carbon waste sinks are overflowing; and (4) the aggregate metabolism of the human economy exceeds the regenerative capacity of the ecosphere (and the ratio is increasing).