Sentences with phrase «human freedom»

But we may also interpret the facts as supporting the belief that there are within limitations real possibilities for the exercise of human freedom in the reconstruction of the orders of existence.

But if human beings are simply part of the world machine then the quest for truth implicit in science is itself an illusion along with human freedom and responsibility generally.

Few civil rights are as central to the cause of human freedom as equal educational opportunity.

Third, great importance is placed on human freedom and responsibility in the wisdom literature.

It would be better, we think, to use the new means at hand to reduce human suffering as much as we can while protecting human freedom and dignity.

But it is not yet clear what human freedom is as such.

You can deny people their basic human freedoms and rights and feel you've done immense good in the world.

Such programs represent a cost - effective approach to relieving population pressures, stimulating economic development, improving health, and enhancing human freedom.

They sometimes seem like such silly word games when human freedom and equality are at stake.

To the recently concluded council, he wrote, we owe a ringing affirmation of the dignity and rights of the human person, and of true human freedom — not least religious freedom.

Human freedom requires not only that the decision be identified as the person's own reality but that the decision have a free range over significant options.

More importantly, however, the claim that (18) is superior to (17) in the context of human freedom raises the serious question of divine deception.

For example, if He has given humans the freedom to make choices, He can not stop them from choosing things He does not like.

It is claimed, in fact, that his discussion throughout is aimed at asserting human freedom.

He placed enormous emphasis upon human freedom and the possibilities of human life.

It is the merit of liberal thought to have taken human freedom much more seriously.

We often deal with the question of human freedom internally to humanity, our wishes, and our acts.

There is first, the consequence for human freedom.

And without a belief in human freedom, an open, free, democratic society can not endure.

This is at the same time both an indictment on a world bent on achievement, as well as a celebration of human freedom as a great gift.

Still, in the end, there is a limit to what human freedom can do.

In the biblical vision, openness to promise coincides with true human freedom.

But if we dispense with the comforting illusion that there is some Pure Theory of The Good Order in which human freedom is acknowledged by securely contained, then it does not make sense to blame our forefathers for not being in possession of such a theory, and for improvising as best they could, given the available terms and possibilities, as stable an equilibrium between freedom and order as could be asked of any human founders.

The liberal approach is one that relies on the government's ability to limit human freedom by just taking material goods and redistributing them.

Freud denied human freedom lest it introduce irrationality into the world.

Speaking about human freedom, he is trying to cope with the Kantian dilemma of freedom and necessity within the framework of the categories of his organic logic.

In his most recently translated book, On the God of the Christians (and on one or two others), published by St. Augustine Press, Brague explores the God who is Father but not male, the God whose way of being One is to be Trinity, the God who doesn't bestow goodness but who is the Good, the God who respects human freedom while inviting humanity into the tangled journey of a salvation history in which God himself is an actor.

The «early» Barth affirmed a version of the sovereignty of God that came close to precluding human freedom from the start.

The good news is that God's eternal plan included a way to right these wrongs without destroying human freedom and even to deepen the glory and beauty of love.

God could, on this hypothesis, occasionally violate human freedom for the sake of an overriding good, or to prevent a particular horrible evil.

To emphasize grace is to emphasize human freedom.

The reason for the pushback you're getting is that the Bible is opposed to «fatalism» (which makes our actions inconsequential for changing things and leads to resignation in the face of such powerlessness) but teaches and presupposes «compatiblism» (that God's absolute sovereignty is compatible with genuine human freedom and responsibility).

Not just human freedom explains conflict and evil in the world but also the humbler forms of freedom that no portions of nature are wholly without.

It's not only killing the economy, it's limiting human freedom in the country, and it's unaccountable.»

Though Barth failed to see how completely God's free love entailed human freedom, he did powerfully realize that human liberation is possible only if the God who creates and sustains this universe has the all - sufficient freedom and love to sustain that liberation.

Even the attraction of Omega does not override human freedom to reject the ultra-personal.

In a modern twist, liberty understood as self - projection sees concepts such as the «laws of nature and of nature's God» as an imposition on human freedom rather than as the ground for liberty.

Barth, whose God is the one who «loves in freedom,» realized that the grace of the free God must be consistent with significant human freedom contra the Augustinian - tradition.

However, when the human being is designated the role of moral creator, thus affirming human freedom and autonomy, the meaning of the Transcendent in this context becomes obscure.