The liberal approach is one that relies on the government's ability to limit
human freedom by just taking material goods and redistributing them.
One is that in choosing an indirect mode of self - revelation, God preserves
human freedom by not coercing us into a trusting relationship.
It could contain doctrines that were not inherently understandable (such as the doctrine of the trinity), or that seemed to be self - contradictory (such as the full humanity and deity of Jesus), or that were contradicted by other doctrines (as, for example,
human freedom by divine predestination, or God's omnipotent goodness by human sin).
Not exact matches
In recent weeks, the War on Gold, which is a subset of the broader War on
Human Freedom, has sharply intensified, with massive, multi-billion dollar naked short price raids now being launched on a weekly and even daily basis
by the criminal, state - sponsored price manipulators.
Of all the refugees interviewed
by the Database Centre for North Korean
Human Rights, 99.7 % said that there is no religious
freedom in North Korea.
What you're giving up is your
freedom to think for yourself
by accepting this fantasy man - in - the - sky BS that has somehow managed to propagate throughout the centuries of modern
human existence.
In a statement, Pope Francis said: «At a time when our
human family is beset
by grave humanitarian crises demanding far - sighted and united political responses, I pray that your decisions will be guided
by the rich spiritual and ethical values that have shaped the history of the American people and your nation's commitment to the advancement of
human dignity and
freedom worldwide.
Human freedom is possible, but we are always, in quite palpable ways, determined
by our histories and that of our own time and place.
I was taught, for example, the Enlightenment mythology of the dark, anti-intellectual ages dominated
by the Church and the growth of
human knowledge and
freedom brought
by those who rejected religion and discovered science.
The loss of traditional, collective, and ritualistic forms of life and the loss of a transcendent horizon are accompanied
by the loss of spontaneous and contingent forms of
human action» what we might call
freedom, if the word had not been so severely abused.
FREE WILL: 1: voluntary choice or decision 2:
freedom of
humans to make choices that are not determined
by prior causes or
by divine intervention
But
by the time the Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights, and Labor released its annual International Religious
Freedom Report two months later, events unfolding in the Middle East had compelled her to reconsider the issue.
Thus, for instance, the self - conscious
freedom of
human activity is made possible
by the extremely complex order that it is privileged to appropriate, including the conditions which support life on this earth and the complexity of the
human body.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious
Freedom's 2010 Annual Report took note of the shift, stating, «This change in phraseology could well be viewed
by human rights defenders and officials in other countries as having concrete policy implications.»
Perhaps John of Salisbury would remind us today that the only laws in conformity with equity are those that protect the sacredness of
human life and reject the licitness of abortion, euthanasia and bold genetic experimentation, those laws that respect the dignity of marriage between a man and a woman, that are inspired
by a correct secularism of the State, a secularism that always entails the safeguard of religious
freedom and that pursues subsidiarity and solidarity at both the national and the international level.
In this world, so full of fictitious forms of
freedom that destroy the environment and the
human being, let us learn true
freedom by the power of the Holy Spirit; to build the school of
freedom; to show others
by our lives that we are free and how beautiful it is to be truly free with the true
freedom of God's children.»
«[N] on - state actors, including rebel and terrorist organizations,... committed
by far some of the most egregious
human rights abuses and caused significant damage to the global status of respect for religious
freedom,» according to the 2014 IRF report.
All the forty
freedoms are endorsed
by international accords such as the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
The death - of - God school tells us that the picture of God we have just outlined, save for its inclusion of love and moral justice when modified
by love, has died on those who have discovered the reality of
human freedom, the
human capacity to act significantly, and the responsibility we have for acting in
freedom.
Rather they are complicated bio-socio-spiritual beings whose
freedom is qualified but not eliminated
by the natural - biological, historical - cultural factors which enter into the formation of
human selfhood.
While Lewis's remarks do not indicate any careful reading of Luther, it is true that Camus rejects a notion of «salvation
by faith alone» on the grounds that it eliminates
human freedom and, to that extent, would not accept the God of Luther, Calvin, or the later Augustine.
The particular mechanisms employed depend on circumstances of history, geography, and culture, and decisions about them can be made responsibly only
by taking account of man's acquisitive propensities, his need for rational order, his longing for
freedom, and his sense of justice — in short,
by relying on an integral rather than a truncated conception of
human nature.
suffering, true sociality, as qualities of the divine, along with radical differences (as we shall see) in the meanings ascribed to creation, the universe,
human freedom, and in the arguments for the existence of God, those inclined to think that any view that is intimately connected with theological traditions must have been disposed of
by this time should also beware lest they commit a non sequitur.
It suggested a certain open - endedness that seemed to undergird
human freedom of response to the divine initiative
by pushing the fullness of God's being ahead to our ultimate future, in the definitive arrival of the eschatological basileia tou theou.
In its fundamental
freedom — true not just for the becoming of each moment of the
human consciousness but for all of creation — everything that emerges into a new present is not bound either
by its past (fatalism) or
by God (determinism).
Whereas Marx found God as standing in the way of
human freedom and autonomy, a barrier to
human emancipation, Bonhoeffer believed that God granted
human freedom and autonomy
by making Jesus the point of disclosure for His transcendence.
The other, «liberal,» possibility is to celebrate the
human freedom and dignity bestowed
by God upon us.
The religious objections have mostly aimed to protect God's sovereign
freedom to do what He pleases with his creation, a
freedom which, the dissenters argue, would be limited
by the existence of universal and unbreakable laws of nature, or indeed of inevitable laws of history or
human behaviour.
Christian education is in the world and for the world... man must work out his salvation in the concrete situation in which God has placed him; not
by protection but
by contributing to the whole
human community of which he is an integral and inseparable part... parents, who have the first and the inalienable right and duty to educate their children, should enjoy true
freedom in the choice of their schools, etc..»
The great St John Paul said that religious
freedom is «the basis of all other
freedoms and is inseparably tied to them
by reason of that very dignity which is the
human person» (letter to the Secretary General of the United Nations, 1978).
The process
by which this happened -
by which concepts such as personal
freedom,
human rights and equality have been slowly distorted to mean something quite other than they did when Christian Europe gave birth to them - has been laboriously traced
by historians of ideas such as Charles Taylor and Alastair Maclntyre.
We live in an age whose chief moral value has been determined,
by overwhelming consensus, to be the absolute liberty of personal volition, the power of each of us to choose what he or she believes, wants, needs, or must possess; our culturally most persuasive models of
human freedom are unambiguously voluntarist and, in a rather debased and degraded way, Promethean; the will, we believe, is sovereign because unpremised, free because spontaneous, and this is the highest good.
True, the right relation between the hierarchical ministry and the laity can never be completely regulated
by institutional and legal methods, but involves also an element of
human freedom as well as of the spirit of the Church.
In addition to worrying about their own flocks, they also fear that the West, smitten with the BJP's growth - oriented economic agenda and preoccupied
by the threat of Islamic extremism, ignores the constriction of religious
freedom and
human rights in India today.
Jennifer Roback Morse of the Acton Institute points out on their website that, in the very first paragraph of the encyclical we discover that «Benedict's perspective on Truth has its own view of
human freedom as well as of the
human good: «Each person finds his good
by adherence to God's plan for him, -LSB-...] in this plan, he finds his truth, and through adherence to this truth he becomes free.»»
But if we dispense with God - talk altogether, we may find that we have not achieved the
freedom of maturity at all, but rather lost it
by confining our discourse to such limits as no longer allow room for the
human spirit to breathe and move.
[T] he exposure of persistent
human rights violations
by the contras has led the Administration not to pressure contra leaders to enforce international codes of conduct,» the Americas Watch Report cited earlier states, «but to drown U.S. public opinion with praise for the «
freedom fighters,» and to attempt to discredit all reports of their violations as inspired
by communist or Sandinista propaganda.
He is the Saviour because he is God reaching out to a broken
human race desperately in need of transformation which can come only
by us using our
freedom to allow him to change us.
Christians need not abandon their evangelizing mission
by joining with others in trying to create a dialogue with Muslims in the hope of eliciting Islamic support for
human rights, including religious
freedom.
Freedom of thought and freedom of speech are freedoms given by God to human beings, though any freedom can be abused - but Islam and Sharia law persecute the slightest wrongs in their o
Freedom of thought and
freedom of speech are freedoms given by God to human beings, though any freedom can be abused - but Islam and Sharia law persecute the slightest wrongs in their o
freedom of speech are
freedoms given
by God to
human beings, though any
freedom can be abused - but Islam and Sharia law persecute the slightest wrongs in their o
freedom can be abused - but Islam and Sharia law persecute the slightest wrongs in their opinion.
McCabe's position regarding the
freedom of the will was obviously vitiated
by the untenable duality he introduced within the
human and divine wills.
While the former aims at the restoration of «true man,» «original man,» the goal of the latter was the transcendence of the
human condition, the acquisition of some degree of
freedom from the needs or laws that determine ordinary
human life
by assimilation to a radically different state of being [The Heating Journey (Pantheon, 1973) p. 17].
It is true that in the last five years more attention has been paid to religious
freedom by human rights groups and the media, but the general pattern is still one of indifference and incomprehension.
Only through
human vigilance can the tenuous equilibrium of
freedom be maintained, and only in this way can the future willed
by God be established in an indeterminate universe.
His imprisonment was condemned
by religious
freedom and
human rights advocates around the world.
Sidney Hook captures this sense of the vulnerability of the
human condition when he defines pragmatism as «the theory and practice of enlarging
human freedom in a precarious and tragic world
by the arts of intelligent social control it may not be [a] lost [cause] if we can summon the courage and intelligence to support our faith in
freedom...» (CAP 193).
James Finn is Senior Editor of
Freedom Review, published
by Freedom House, a
human rights advocacy group based in New York City.
From Plato onwards, philosophers have sought to escape from the anxiety of personal
freedom by searching for certainty and objectivity in a supra -
human realm, whether it be that of unchanging Platonic Forms, or in the inexorable unfolding of some grand historical design, or in an eternal life with an omniscient, loving, supreme Being.
It is connected to the sexual revolution, and it is connected to a
human desire in terms of a
freedom that knows no bounds other than that which is assigned
by the conventions of the day.
A priori (
by «dichotomic» analysis of the various outlets theoretically offered to our
freedom of action) as well as a posteriori (
by classification of the various
human attitudes in fact observable around us), three alternatives, together forming a logically connected sequence, seem to express and exhaust all the possibilities open to our assessment and choice as we contemplate the future of Mankind: a) pessimism or optimism; b) the optimism of withdrawal or the optimism of evolution; c) evolution in terms of the many or of the unit.