If this claim holds up, Mitalipov will have taken a crucial step forward in the possibility of
human germline engineering.
A panel of ethicists convened by the U.S. National Academies of Medicine and Science also staked out that position in February, ruling that
human germline engineering might someday be permissible for correcting diseases, but only if there are no alternatives and not for enhancements.
Not exact matches
In October, a UNESCO bioethics panel recommended a temporary ban on «
engineering of the
human germline, at least as long as the safety and efficacy of the procedures are not adequately proven».
The ability to alter
human genes in a way that can be passed onto offspring, called
germline engineering, has long been possible.
Tina Hesman Saey covered researchers» arguments for and against this type of genetic
engineering in «Editing
human germline cells debated» (SN: 5/30/15, p. 16).