In essense, IPCC ’95 reported a «balance of evidence» of evidence verdict
on human impacts on climate — which is the English civil - law expression, as opposed to «beyond reasonable doubt» which is the criminal - law expression.
Depending on emissions rates, that level could double or nearly triple by the end of the century, greatly amplifying
future human impacts on climate, the report says.
But the paper «Political influences on greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. states» adds what the MSU researchers say is an important layer to
understanding human impact on climate change.
Last year, Thomas Knutson and Jeffrey Ploshay at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's geophysical fluid dynamics laboratory at Princeton University in New Jersey used wet bulb globe temperature to
detect human impacts on the climate.
In an e-mail message, Dr. Hansen told me that he considers Mr. Barnes a «straight shooter» and that the strategy is the only one that could survive in Washington and actually
blunt human impact on the climate.
Specifically, there's a case for avoiding continued dependence on fossil fuels that persuades me regardless of what scientists think they know about the long -
term human impact on our climate.
That is no tornado would appear at the same place, the same time, with the same wind speed without changes to the climate system that have been caused
by human impacts on climate And so every tornado is very likely affected somewhat by climate change.
In its 2012 statement on Climate Change, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) has reconfirmed that there is compelling evidence of
human impact on the climate system with potentially far - reaching consequences for ecological and political systems.
29 21.3 Climate Changes
Human Impact on Climate Changes The Greenhouse Effect • The greenhouse effect is a natural warming of both Earth's lower atmosphere and Earth's surface from solar radiation being absorbed and emitted by the atmosphere.
«Depending on emissions rates, carbon dioxide concentrations could double or nearly triple from today's level by the end of the century, greatly amplifying
future human impacts on climate.
In western New York, officials and environmental advocates hope the Trump administration won't suppress a report that warns of
the human impact on the climate.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) holds that climate change is unequivocal and that humans influence climate, while the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is skeptical of
the human impact on climate change.
«If human activities are starting to impact this system, it is a worrying sign that the scale of
human impacts on the climate system may be reaching a critical point.»
The human impact on climate during this era greatly exceeds that due to known changes in natural processes, such as solar changes and volcanic eruptions.»
«Warming greater than 2 degrees Celsius above 19th - century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity and — if sustained over centuries — melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea levels of several meters,» the AGU declares in its first statement in four years on «
Human Impacts on Climate.»
Most notable is the discussion of
the human impact on climate change in Forecast Earth: The Story of Climate Scientist Inez Fung.
Confusingly, it appears that one
human impact on the climate — the Antarctic ozone hole — is currently compensating for another, global warming.
Core themes include reducing losses in inevitable disasters; limiting
the human impact on the climate system and its impact on us; expanding access to safe, clean energy sources; conserving and caring for the planet's other species; finding ways to use new communication tools and practices to best effect.
Is this increase due to global warming (which is almost certainly in large part due to
human impacts on climate)?
Re» We will effectively never find out what
the human impact on the climate system actually is — whether we are heating the planet or cooling it or having no impact whatsoever.»
We will effectively never find out what
the human impact on the climate system actually is — whether we are heating the planet or cooling it or having no impact whatsoever.
The scientific basis for the Greenhouse Effect and the potential for
a human impact on climate is based on well - established scientific fact, and should not be denied.
I do not object to scientific efforts to measure the extent of
human impact on climate.
The resulting book, «The Climate War: True Believers, Power Brokers and the Fight to Save the Planet,» is a fascinating, if depressing, look at how Washington works — or doesn't work, if your goal is meaningful laws limiting
the human impact on climate.
But I had been focused on climate and humans since 1984, when I began reporting what would end up being a long cover story for Science Digest magazine assessing nuclear winter, kind of the inverse potential
human impact on climate (global cooling from a pall of smoke rising from incinerated cities).
An update in The Times refers to a sentence linking
the human impact on climate to a «development model based on the intensive use of fossil fuels.»
Conservative think tanks that once championed geoengineering as easier and cheaper than cutting emissions have now all aligned with the view that
the human impact on climate is so small that we don't even have to worry about it.
Phrases with «human impact on climate»