«If human activities are starting to impact this system, it is a worrying sign that the scale of
human impacts on the climate system may be reaching a critical point.»
In an interesting paper that appeared in the journal Global Environmental Change, a group of scholars, including Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard, and Michael Oppenheimer, a geoscientist at Princeton, note that so - called climate skeptics frequently accuse climate scientists of «alarmism» and «overreacting to evidence of
human impacts on the climate system.»
In its 2012 statement on Climate Change, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) has reconfirmed that there is compelling evidence of
human impact on the climate system with potentially far - reaching consequences for ecological and political systems.
Re» We will effectively never find out what
the human impact on the climate system actually is — whether we are heating the planet or cooling it or having no impact whatsoever.»
Air pollution, ozone depletion, acid precipitation, global warming, desertification, smog production, and deforestation are but a few of
the human impacts on the climate system that arise from the alteration of the mass and energy exchange with the atmosphere.
This impasse raises the prospect that in a year's time — even as the scientific evidence mounts that
human impact on the climate system is veering out of control — there will be no internationally agreed legally binding commitments regulating greenhouse gas emissions.
Human impacts on the climate system include increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g., carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons and their substitutes, methane, nitrous oxide, etc.), air pollution, increasing concentrations of airborne particles, and land alteration.
Not exact matches
James Balog, who founded Extreme Ice Survey that uses photography and videography to document the
impact of
climate change
on glaciers — work that was the basis of his 2012 documentary «Chasing Ice» — said his work shows how
human activities are transforming Earth's
systems.
Human influence
on the
climate system is clear and growing, with
impacts observed
on all continents.
Revkin is among those credited with developing the idea that
humans, through growing
impacts on Earth's
climate and other critical
systems, had created a «geological age of our own making,» known increasingly as the Anthropocene.
We need to better explain the
impacts of
climate on the
systems we care about, such as the
human systems, ecological, carbon cycle
systems.
In a November report, the panel observed that «
human influence
on the
climate system is clear and growing, with
impacts observed
on all continents.»
This SAMSI program will study the interrelations among
climate data,
climate models and
impacts with a view towards projecting future
climate change and its
impact on earth
systems and the
human population.
Three separate Working Groups contribute to the Assessment, which analyzes the current scientific understanding of
impacts of
climate change
on natural, managed and
human systems, the capacity of these
systems to adapt and their vulnerability.
It concluded that
human influence
on the
climate system is clear and growing, with
impacts observed
on all continents.
Duration: Approximately 45 mins 23 slides covering: •
Human Impacts on Earth
Systems • A Warming World • Atmospheric
Climate Change •
Impacts on the Hydrosphere • Sea Level Rise • Coral Bleaching • Deforestation and Earth
Systems •
Impact on the Hydrosphere - Ocean Acidification •
Impact on the Biosphere - Ocean Acidification • Computer Modelling
Responding to comments 14, 25, and 56: I'm a policy analyst in Seattle, well - read
on the
impacts of
climate change, but also other global resource constraints — like peak oil, peak phosphorus and the limits of industrial agriculture, waters supply (closely related to
climate), and
human systems / governance.
Global
climate change risks are high to very high with global mean temperature increase of 4 °C or more above preindustrial levels in all reasons for concern (Assessment Box SPM.1), and include severe and widespread
impacts on unique and threatened
systems, substantial species extinction, large risks to global and regional food security, and the combination of high temperature and humidity compromising normal
human activities, including growing food or working outdoors in some areas for parts of the year (high confidence).
In recent decades, changes in
climate have caused
impacts on natural and
human systems on all continents and across the oceans.
The take - home message, directly in sync with the core findings of the last two assessments from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, can be distilled to a fairly straightforward statement: Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide will result in long - lasting warming that will progressively produce more harmful
impacts on conditions and
systems that influence
human wellbeing.
Yes, there is strong evidence of
impacts of recent observed
climate change
on physical, biological, and
human systems.
Despite this, many
climate change
impacts on the physical environment and ecosystems have been identified, and increasing numbers of
impacts have been found in
human systems as well.
So if we can imagine a total earth -
human system (including solar input and other extra terrestial
impacts), then
climate change itself might be considered a «forcing»
on a very sensitive
system that wreaks extreme havoc, whereas CC alone would have only caused considerable harm.
The fact that certain analytical conclusions about observed
climate change, attribution to
human causes, in particular the energy
system and deforestation, projected greater
climate change in the future, observed
impacts of
climate change
on natural and
human systems, and projected very disruptive consequences in the future given our current trajectory, is not due to «group think» but rather to a generally shared analysis based
on evidence.
Impacts - The effects of
climate change
on natural and
human systems.
The challenges are significant, but the record of progress suggests that within the next decade the scientific community will develop fully coupled dynamical (prognostic) models of the full Earth
system (e.g., the coupled physical
climate, biogeochemical,
human sub-systems) that can be employed
on multi-decadal time - scales and at spatial scales relevant to strategic
impact assessment.
These processes affect the transport of water, heat, salinity, nutrients and carbon in the ocean,
impacting on the
climate system by modifying it's ability to absorb
human - emitted carbon dioxide and excess heat resulting from increased carbon dioxide concentrations.
«Scenarios of different rates and magnitudes of
climate change provide a basis for assessing the risk of crossing identifiable thresholds in both physical change and
impacts on biological and
human systems».
• The effects of management strategies
on climate, ecosystem services, and the resilience of ecosystems to
climate change; field experiments and models designed to learn about coupled
human - and environmental
systems and to test different management interventions • The valuation of ecosystem services, including the economic or other costs associated with
impacts of
climate and other environmental changes • Adaptive approaches and institutional and governance mechanisms for addressing the regulatory aspects of special status species management
That is no tornado would appear at the same place, the same time, with the same wind speed without changes to the
climate system that have been caused by
human impacts on climate And so every tornado is very likely affected somewhat by
climate change.
When you claim that a nation such as the United States which emits high levels of ghgs need not adopt
climate change policies because adverse
human - induced
climate change
impacts have not yet been proven, are you claiming that
climate change skeptics have proven that
human - induced
climate change will not create harsh adverse
impacts to the
human health and the ecological
systems of others
on which their lives often depend and if so what is that proof?
I'm not saying that
human activities do not have an
impact on climate, I am just saying that we have greatly overlooked the natural cyclical nature of our solar
system, as well as other factors that effect
climate change.
To respond to
climate change, it is necessary to predict what its
impacts on natural and
human systems will be.
Mostly they just move energy around in the
climate system, which definitely has effects
on how
humans perceive global warming and how the
impacts of warming are spread through the
system.
Revkin is among those credited with developing the idea that
humans, through growing
impacts on Earthâs
climate and other critical
systems, had created a âgeological age of our own making, â known increasingly as the Anthropocene.
She has been working
on analysing
climate change
impacts on societal sectors for several years, focusing
on the analysis of
human - environmental
systems, using conceptual as well as quantitative modelling approaches and spatial analysis methods.
When you claim that the United States need not adopt
climate change policies because adverse
climate change
impacts have not yet been proven, are you claiming that
climate change skeptics have proven that
human - induced
climate change will not create adverse
impacts on human health and the ecological
systems of others
on which their life often depends and if so what is that proof?
In this way, writes geophysicist David Archer in The Long Thaw: How
Humans Are Changing the Next 100,000 Years of the Earth's
Climate, «humankind has the capacity to overpower the climate impact of Earth's orbit, taking the reins of the climate system that has operated on Earth for millions of years.
Climate, «humankind has the capacity to overpower the
climate impact of Earth's orbit, taking the reins of the climate system that has operated on Earth for millions of years.
climate impact of Earth's orbit, taking the reins of the
climate system that has operated on Earth for millions of years.
climate system that has operated
on Earth for millions of years.»
Systems: In recent decades, changes in climate (including both anthropogenic and natural changes) have caused impacts on natural and human systems on all continents and
Systems: In recent decades, changes in
climate (including both anthropogenic and natural changes) have caused
impacts on natural and
human systems on all continents and
systems on all continents and oceans.
The IPCC reported that «warming of the
climate system is unequivocal» and that «changes in
climate have caused
impacts on natural and
human systems on all continents and across the oceans.»
All four of us have dedicated our scientific careers to understand the processes and
impacts of
climate change, variously studying ocean
systems, tropical cyclones, ice sheets and ecosystems as well as
impacts on human societies.
Covering Antarctica is tricky for science journalists: The quantities of ice, and therefore, the potential
impact on the global
climate system is beyond
human comprehension — but often, so are the timescales.
A more complete and accurate assessment of the
human impact on greenhouse gases requires greater understanding of sources, processes, and coupling between different parts of the
climate system:
This study differs from previous treatments of abrupt changes by focusing
on abrupt
climate changes and also abrupt
climate impacts that have the potential to severely affect the physical
climate system, natural
systems, or
human systems, often affecting multiple interconnected areas of concern.
I find the yearly buildup of layer upon layer to be a particularly compelling way of visualizing how we
humans are fundamentally altering the chemistry of the atmosphere — and thereby causing profound, continuing
impacts on our planet's
climate control
system.
It has been suggested that a top - down allocation approach is more appropriate for boundaries where
human activities exert a direct
impact on the Earth (that is,
climate change, ocean acidification, ozone depletion and chemical pollution), while a multiscale approach is more appropriate for boundaries that are spatially heterogeneous (that is biogeochemical flows, freshwater use, land -
system change, biodiversity loss and aerosol loading).8 Even with a top - down approach and a single global boundary, however, allocation is fraught with difficult ethical issues.
The framework of the study is represented,
on the one hand, by the scientific assessment of
climate change, with its
impacts and associated effects
on human and natural
systems, and,
on the other hand, by the international response to this challenge.
Now their key findings reveal huge concern that
human influence
on climate systems has increasing
impact on every single continent.
Externalities may be addressed by either a tax / credit or some other public policy, public ownership and management of the commons, or privatization of the commons, or through court actions — each option may have it's own costs — for example, the large - scale privatization of the
climate system may be impractical with given technology (analogy with toll roads), and even without that, it has at least an aesthetic cost (nature is supposed to be nature; and psychologically,
humans may benifit from some amount of public space) and perhaps scientific (ie nature — in this context, nature as it is with relatively small
impacts of humankind — is not nature if it is not being itself) costs; there may be inefficiencies in the court
system that could be bypassed for issues that are easily addressed with legislation (unless we had a class - action lawsuit
on behalf of all people now until the year).
Since the mid-1970s, he has focused
on studies and computer simulations of Earth's
climate, working to understand the
climate system and
human impacts on global
climate.