Sentences with phrase «human influence on the climate system»

A group of Australian scientists has begun a new online effort to communicate the body of science pointing to a rising human influence on the climate system.

What's refreshing is that the building human influence on the climate system is not being portrayed definitively as an unfolding catastrophe, with present - day events cast as the reason for action.

But I wouldn't look for fresh findings there to up - end the basic picture of a growing human influence on the climate system.

Everything laid out above tends to draw attention away from the broad and deep body of work pointing to a growing and long - lasting human influence on the climate system.

And of course there's plenty here on the basic science pointing to a rising human influence on the climate system.

«If we were in a court of law, with human influence on the climate system in the dock, the verdict for Australia's 2013 heat wave would be guilty as charged.

How would you summarize your take on the evidence for a building human influence on the climate system worth responding to (that specific question)?

The panel reported that the world is warming throughout the lower atmosphere, as climate models had predicted, and acknowledged «clear evidence of human influences on the climate system.»

Did the disclosed information in some substantial way undercut the broad body of evidence pointing to a rising human influence on the climate system?

One of the toughest realities attending debates over what to do, or not do, about the growing human influence on the climate system is that more science does not necessarily clarify society's, or individual's, responses.

Although Pielke accepts that the evidence for human influence on the climate system is robust, he stresses that the goal of cutting global carbon emissions is incompatible with economic growth for the world's poorest 1.5 billion people.

But the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — the evidence of 600 climate researchers in 32 countries reporting changes to Earth's atmosphere, ice and seas — in 2013 stated «human influence on the climate system is clear.»

Human influence on the climate system is clear and growing, with impacts observed on all continents.

«The human influence on the climate system has the effect of intensifying precipitation extremes,» Zwiers notes.

Most importantly «human influence on the climate system is clear» and «continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming.»

«In the case of California's drought, the climate models do not indicate that such extremely low precipitation is an expected consequence of human influence on the climate system,» said

«In the case of California's drought, the climate models do not indicate that such extremely low precipitation is an expected consequence of human influence on the climate system,» said Ken Caldeira, a Stanford - based scientist with the Carnegie Institution for Science's global ecology department.

They found a severe 3 year drought was 2 to 3 times more likely due to human - induced climate change, and then write: «We conclude that human influences on the climate system are implicated in the current Syrian conflict.»

In a November report, the panel observed that «human influence on the climate system is clear and growing, with impacts observed on all continents.»

It concluded that human influence on the climate system is clear and growing, with impacts observed on all continents.

Human influence on the climate system is clear.

Global Warming vs Climate Change,» an interesting new study of Americans» perceptions of the two dominant shorthand phrases used to describe the building human influence on the climate system.

For months, the stasist blogosphere has been aflame with «Gates of various kinds — attempts to spin one or two errors or overstatements on particular issues, along with various comments in the East Anglia e-mail messages, into the unraveling of the many lines of science pointing to a rising, and risky, human influence on the climate system.

When I'm forced to compress it down to just those two words I'm talking about the human influence on the climate system through the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

As part of the trend in higher education toward moving more course offerings onto the Web, the University of Chicago has launched Open Climate 101, an online version of a popular course led by David Archer that explores for non-science majors the body of research pointing to a rising human influence on the climate system.

-- He has not given a substantial speech focused on the responsibility of the world's greatest emitter of greenhouse gases to face up to the long - term risks posed by the rising human influence on the climate system and pursue the opportunities that lie in a sustained «energy quest.»

It may take another president, or two, before America's energy quest gets into the necessary gear, perhaps driven by a confluence of a new spike in oil prices and rising anger among veterans wounded protecting fuel convoys in Afghanistan and building evidence pointing to a growing, and harmful, human influence on the climate system.

The science pointing to a rising human influence on the climate system is simply delineating the boundaries of the problem — and they are still very fuzzy boundaries on many important points (the extent of warming and pace of sea level rise, just for starters).

I think it'd make sense to devote at least as many column inches to this vital issue as you've expended trying to undercut decades of scientific study pointing to a growing human influence on the climate system.

There have been a lot of attempts to categorize the varied assemblage of people with strongly held positions on the scope of, and threat from, the building human influence on the climate system.

In 2002, the National Academy of Sciences published «Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises,» a valuable report examining whether and how the building human influence on the climate system might lead to disruptive jolts.

After the unseasonably early Blue Mountains bushfires in spring 2013, then Prime Minister Tony Abbott rejected their presence as a diagnostic of human influences on the climate system.

The choice of 1960 as the ending date of this period was based on past changes in human influences on the climate system.

They also stated that «Human influence on the climate system is clear.»

«Human influence on the climate system is clear,» he said.

«Human influence on the climate system is clear... Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia.»

Now their key findings reveal huge concern that human influence on climate systems has increasing impact on every single continent.

The summary related aviation's role relative to all human influence on the climate system: «The best estimate of the radiative forcing in 1992 by aircraft is 0.05 W m — 2 or about 3.5 % of the total radiative forcing by all anthropogenic activities.»

If so, Cooney better keep his day job, since that program recently declared «clear evidence of human influences on the climate system.»