Sentences with phrase «human judge»

Computer models only needed about 100 likes to outperform an average human judge in their sample.
Our behavior in society and how humans judge «right» and «wrong» is based in the culture in which we are raised.
Human judges achieved much lower accuracy: 61 % for men and 54 % for women.
This is wrong: (1) it might not be possible to «judge» human laws in a supernatural way, especially when the supernatural hasn't been shown to exist; (2) we as humans judge human laws all the time — we do it through philosophy, political science, and economics, for instance.
«Compared with the accuracy of various human judges reported in the meta - analysis, computer models need 10, 70, 150, and 300 Likes, respectively, to outperform an average work colleague, cohabitant or friend, family member, and spouse,» they wrote, which you can see in the below chart.
Essentially, Psalm 82 is where God, the judge of all, sits in judgment on corrupt human judges.
Although the software would not replace human judges, the researchers say that their algorithm could help cut the reoffender rate in half, to 10 percent, perhaps averting more than 1,000 domestic violence arrests every year for the average large U.S. city.
(And yes, there are olympic sports that are judged, but even for judged olympic sports, there are very strict guidelines for how an athlete should be judged, and they try to eliminate bias and human judging error as much as possible by eliminating the highest and lowest judged score, all so it can remain as objective as possible instead of being a subjective opinion of an athlete's performance.)
We do not need to think of the judgments of God legalistically, as we do when a human judge instructs the jury in a court case; yet the judgments of God are directly related to the laws of God.
There is a whole book of the Bible devoted to some of the human judges.
Human judges have authority to judge, but their authority comes from God.
Humans judge the outward but God judges the heart (from the Bible).
Twice in each match, players will be allowed to challenge the human judge's ruling and leave it up to artificial intelligence.
In each case, the human judge was unable to say for certain whether they were interacting with a person or a machine.
Also known as the «imitation game», it requires a human judge to converse with two hidden entities, a human and a machine, and then determine which is which.
In practice, some applications of the test require a machine to engage in dialogue and convince a human judge that it is an actual person.
That said, the main focus of my practice tends to involve translating human interactions into legal terms which are then assessed by human judges and tribunals.
And computers can sift through more precedents than any human judge ever could.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z