Collective
human judgment informed by reliable evidence is a much better way to assess teaching and learning in schools than data - driven judgment based on high stakes standardized tests.
Collective
human judgment informed by reliable evidence is a much better way to assess teaching and learning in schools than data - driven judgment based on high - stakes standardized tests.
Not exact matches
Rather, it
informs all as to the basic principles that ought to be taken into account in coming to specific
judgments, in interpreting the particularities of
human situations and in guiding concerted action.
And as Andy Smarick has argued, voucher programs need something akin to authorizers, too, so that decisions about participating schools can be
informed by nuance and
human judgment, not just by test scores and other data points.
It's a good idea to rank these groups into low, medium or high influencers so that you can make an
informed judgment on how resources — both financial and
human — are best allocated.
The whole point of collecting all of this information — and DQC is clear that they mean much more than just test scores — is to use it to
inform inquiry,
human judgment, and decision - making.
The material in these two lessons reminds students of the importance of living in a democracy whose institutions safeguard civil and
human rights and whose citizens are capable of making
informed judgments, not only on behalf of themselves but on behalf of a larger community.
Now of course these
judgments may be
informed by medical observations — for instance, when the brain develops to a certain level, or when something will end up naturally growing into a born
human without any further intervention — or by pragmatic considerations, gut feel, opinion polls, tradition, views about how precise and clear legal lines should be, or whatever else.