Human judgment is marginalized.
Consequently,
human judgment is reduced to a minimum and there is no guarantee non-economic losses like pain and suffering and long - term disability will be reflected in the estimate generated.
It's time to stop pretending that fallible
human judgment is «science.»
In other words,
human judgment is central to science.
He discovered, as Montaigne wrote, «From frequenting the world a wonderful clarity of
human judgment is acquired.»
Human judgment is very much part of its evaluation system, which itself is part of a larger effort focused on sound hiring practices and significant feedback and supports for educators.
Another area of the criminal justice system that relies on
human judgment is the arraignment — when a suspect has been arrested but not yet charged and a judge has to decide whether to release or lock up the alleged offender until his or her next court date.
Similarly, the theory of
human judgment is not merely a specification or instantiation of the more general theory.
In Buchler's system, a principle of ontological parity is a commitment which pervades the analyses in both the general ontology and the more specific metaphysics of what Buchler calls human utterance.1 For Buchler, that no one of three modes of
human judgment is any more of a judgment than any other is also an exemplification of the more general principle of ontological parity.
Regardless of the purpose, though, NEVER should [VAMs] be used in isolation of other measures and NEVER should they be used without a great deal of
human judgment re: what the VAM estimates in reality and in context demonstrate, in light of what they can and just can not do.»
Not exact matches
And as much as
AI is a useful tool, it will never replace
human judgment, he said.
To
be clear, he doesn't see an end to the need for people skills at work and
human judgment in reviews, but he argues A.I. can help managers objectively identify patterns in workers» strengths and weaknesses.
That
is defensible only if one
is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of
human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere
human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.
«With
human inspectors it
's difficult to get even the same person to make consistent
judgments,» says Ng, let alone multiple people across multiple products.
It
's because — like it or not —
human beings make snap
judgments about the people they meet for the first time.
And finally, they got «
human personality
judgments» from the participants» Facebook friends, who
were asked to give descriptions of the participants using a shorter version of the personality test.
According to Keith Rabois, a Khosla Ventures partner and former executive at LinkedIn, PayPal, and Square, areas that require
human expert
judgment, like healthcare and law,
are most likely to see disruption in the coming years.
«One of the most interesting things we've noticed over the last decade
is the ability of math and machines to replace
human judgment, particularly expert
judgment,» Rabois said on Founder Calls, a new podcast run by Box CEO Aaron Levie.
I think it
is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and, in general, it
is better to have a system that
is safe from errors in
judgment and surprise than it
is to try and avoid errors in
judgment and surprises because as along as you
are dealing with
human beings, there will
be errors and surprises.
The biggest hurdle, of course,
is what
is seen as the future of investing: a dramatic turn toward complex computer algorithms and artificial intelligence - and away from the
human touch, the instincts and the
judgment honed over decades that once put Miller at the top of the heap.
Yet we
are still
human beings, and one of the things that separates us from other animals
is that we make moral
judgments.
If your god's «
judgment»
is to kill, how
is that any different than a flawed
human?
Misery, sorrow, poverty, loneliness, helplessness, and guilt mean something different in the eyes of God than according to
human judgment; that God turns toward the very places from which
humans turn away; that Christ
was born in a stable because there
was no room for him in the inn — a prisoner grasps this better than others.
That biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American idea: that government stood under the
judgment of divine and natural law; that government
was limited in its reach into
human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness
was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed in the world by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could
be truly free.
And his virtues as a scholar — solid research, rigorous thinking, careful
judgment, and a profound compassion for troubled
human beings —
are on full display in his book.
Social status
is an irrelevance, a
human invention of no spiritual importance; one can not allow the
human evaluation of an occupation's importance to
be placed above the
judgment of God who put you there.
Their awful failures and wrongdoings
are part of the story, as
are the
human consequences, divine
judgment and...
It
's not hard to understand why
human beings long for some sort of
judgment day.
Its greatness
is reflected in its rich and full realization of the complicated nature of
human behavior and of the difficulty of moral
judgment for living mortals.
«The
judgment whether a people
is virtuous or not virtuous can hardly
be passed by a
human being.
If God
is as the Calvinist insists, then they
are right: we mere
humans can not question God's
judgment or challenge His choices from eternity past to choose some for redemption and others for reprobation.
What he
was getting round to saying
was that «Failing to recognise
RE amongst the humanities... surely implies a
judgment about what religious education can contribute towards the formation and education of the
human person?»
Thus in either case the
judgment is pronounced upon man not from the
human standpoint, as if man»
s value
were somehow immanent and securely possessed by him, but from without — according to Jesus, of course, God
is the only Judge.
Does the New Testament, in asserting that Jesus
is risen from the dead, mean that his death
is not just an ordinary
human death, but the
judgment and salvation of the world, depriving death of its power?
At this level the set - up
is, «Since everyone
is corrupt,
is it possible for even the best of
human beings to
be delivered from sin or survive the
judgment of God?»
Sedrick, do you have any religious «authority» to make these statements and
judgments against your fellow
human beings?
The most crucial learning to
be sought in such a situation
is the recognition of the fundamental difference between
human judgments and divine
judgment: that
human achievements pass quickly while only the divine
judgment is eternal and penetrates everything hidden.
This
is not so much a
judgment upon the rich as it
is a recognition of
human nature.
This
is also seen in the difference between those who see Jesus as in some way embodying a universal principle, as
is the case of theologians in the tradition of Schleiermacher, and those, like the great Swiss theologian Karl Barth, who stressed that
humans can in no way sit in
judgment on God's revelation.
Whether by «perfect» we mean simply sinless, or whether we mean perfect in knowledge and love and
judgment and other aspects as well, it
is simply impossible for anyone who
is human to
be this.
All the acts which I have done expressly to serve thee, and also all the acts which I believe to
be neutral and purely
human, and also all the acts which I know to
be disobedience and sin, I put in thy hands, 0 God, my Lord and Savior; take them now that they
are finished; prove them thyself to see which enter into thy work and which deserve only
judgment and death; use, cut, trim, reset, readjust, now that it
is no longer I who can decide or know, now that what
is done
is done, what I have written I have written.
His mysterious
judgments - the mysteries of His love - have to
be accepted if there
is to
be any hope at all for
human intelligence.
A «rational soul,» in Thomistic thought,
is the summit of
human faculties, which by exercising
judgment is able to recognize the existence of God and, ultimately, to receive divine revelation.
I might just qualify my
judgment by saying that Kierkegaard remains perhaps the greatest
human humorist among philosophers, since I suspect that — at least at some spiritual level — Hamann
was actually the miscegenate offspring of a satyr and an angel.
In my
judgment, the «Social Principles» of the United Methodists, the «Statement on Economic Justice» of the Lutheran Church in America, the «Statement on
Human Rights» of the United Church of Christ, and the World Council of Churches» themes of «Justice, Sustainability and Participation»
are models of such efforts.
Rather, it informs all as to the basic principles that ought to
be taken into account in coming to specific
judgments, in interpreting the particularities of
human situations and in guiding concerted action.
Human beings are capable of rational
judgments based on a longer view of things.
All of history, in Martin Luther's words,
is «a demonstration, recollection, and sign of divine action and
judgment, how God upholds, rules, obstructs, rewards, punishes, and honors the world, especially the
human world.»
«Mr. Graham's calling
is not to pass
judgment, but to proclaim the biblical truth that Jesus
is the only way to heaven» ------ I'd like to know what Mr. Graham's response
is to the fact that not all
humans in this world know who Jesus
is.
«Mr. Graham's calling
is not to pass
judgment, but to proclaim the biblical truth that Jesus
is the only way to heaven (Jn 14:6), allowing every individual and group to fall along that plumb line...» «He further stressed that salvation
is the work of Almighty God, and that only He knows what
is in each
human heart,» the statement said.