Soros first wanted to be a philosopher, someone who made a contribution to
human knowledge like Sigmund Freud or John Maynard Keynes.
Not exact matches
Yeah, go back to your X-Box and let the real thinkers
like DumbG there conjecture about all the things no one can disprove, for to truly disprove anything you need complete
knowledge of everything in the universe, and since no
human will ever achieve that, people
like DumbG can tell as many unproven «truths» as they want.
I would
like to point out to those here who think it is not possible for Jesuits (or anyone) to hold science and faith simultaneously, and who invoke «evidence» as the only arbiter of what is real, that
human knowledge is always evolving.
Why not show yourself by giving all
humans perfect
knowledge of your existence (
like angels) if it's so important to be praised by us?
to Jake, in every era or times in the past,
humans have different perception of reality, because our
knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today,
like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays
knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become
humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.
For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards
human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation
like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and
knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
like all
human knowledge, is provisional.
In the forthcoming Victories of Reason he will go even further, contending that the most significant advances in
knowledge, liberty,
human rights and material well - being — what we
like to call progress — stem not from Greece or the Enlightenment or modernity but from Christianity itself.
You doubt something
like carbon dating, without realizing how old isotope
knowledge is, nor do you understand how far beyond we are in
human genome research.
In a world ruled by education and intellect, we feel
like we lose credibility without our
human knowledge or wisdom.
So I guess you would be fine with a student at a high school graduation getting up to the podium and saying «I would
like to take this moment to reflect on how strength of will and character helped all of us to graduate today, and please join with me for a moment of reflection at how amazingly the
human race has evolved, to this point of passing on our collective
knowledge to each new class, and to hope that we add to it, for if we do not, the future may be very dim.
In every truth there is something more than we would have expected, in the love that we receive there is always an element that surprises us -LSB-...] In all
knowledge and in every act of love the
human soul experiences something «over and above», which seems very much
like a gift that we receive, or a height to which we are raised.»
At least when you have no
knowledge you should speak in respectful manner in respect of the feelings of others... you said you
liked me as
human I say ok fine and I will do the same but to insult my belief and whom I as Muslim hold in high respect... well then you are not a worthy
human being to treat as one... Hope you feel for me as I would have felt for you.
Things
like education, scientific
knowledge, and scientific examination of the way
humans act and react are needed to forestall any future «nightmare» of «biblical» proportions as regards survival of the
human species.
Certainly the early chapters of Genesis are
like such stories, and were meant to explain how
humans came to possess god -
like knowledge, yet also remained mortal
like animals.
So, by that, compounded with problems such as Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty, the observer's effect, and the
like — the modern day
human lacks sufficient qualification to ascertain a good part of their
knowledge as being absolute.
It is quite another order of
knowledge that discloses, for example, the «lunar destiny» of
human existence, the fact that man is «measured» by the temporal rhythms illustrated by the phases of the moon, that he is fated to die but, quite
like the moon which reappears after three days of darkness, man too can begin his existence anew, that in any case he nourishes the hope in a life after death, assured or ameliorated through an initiation ritual.
why don't you start with why
humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible,
knowledge of all the gods that
humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians
like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.
Speaking to Princeton students, the late Adlai E. Stevenson once declared: «What a man knows at fifty that he did not know at twenty boils down to something
like this: the
knowledge that he has acquired with age is not the
knowledge of formulas... but of people, places, actions — a
knowledge not gained... by words, but by touch, sight, sound, victories, failures, sleeplessness, devotion, love — the
human experiences and emotions of this earth; and perhaps, too, a little faith and a little reverence for the things you can not see.»
Given the
knowledge that they are crapping in their own habitat with their carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning on Earth, I'd
like to think
humans have gained an evolutionary advantage which canines lack.
The term cognition is used in several loosely related ways to refer to a faculty for the
human -
like processing of information, applying
knowledge and changing preferences.
The algorithms they develop help machines learn from data and apply that
knowledge in new situations, much
like humans do.
Sounding more
like a postmodern philosopher than a physicist, Krauss wonders whether string theory stems from an innate
human tendency to believe that «just beyond our reach, just behind the mirror, lies the key to
knowledge.»
«Having the genome sequence is
like having part of the instruction manual,» says study author Richard Wilson of Washington University in Saint Louis (W.U.), echoing the famous 2000 comment of then
Human Genome Project leader Francis Collins, who called
knowledge of our genome a «glimpse of our instruction book.»
Together with colleagues at IBM led by Scott Spangler, principal data scientist at IBM, the team initiated a research project to develop a
knowledge integration tool that took advantage of existing text mining capabilities, such as those used by IBM's Watson technology (cognitive technology that processes information more
like a
human than a computer.)
«I don't think
human knowledge is
like that....
With the vast
knowledge of humankind mere touchscreen taps away, it's fair to say websites
like Wikipedia represent a kind of boundless augmented memory for
humans.
With such
knowledge, it may be possible to stimulate these nerve cells by artificial means, for example by selective nicotine -
like drugs, to improve memory and learning in
humans.
This is
human life being destroyed, and just
like other times in
human history when
human testing was performed without the
knowledge or consent of the subject, it is indefensible.
It's my business to know things
like that») there is no evidence from this book that he has any first - hand
knowledge of the scientific literature on
human evolution.
Still, science, just
like any other
human inquiry into
knowledge, can not hold a monopoly on truth.
However, this is inefficient and has a low throughput method so I aim to use our growing
knowledge of epigenetics to devise strategies for «reprogramming»
human somatic cells towards a stem cell
like phenotype.
Like all the research before this breakthrough, the experiments that brought scientists to this
knowledge were conducted on mice, but it is very possible that soon enough we will see
humans being given these drugs and being tested and treated.
The Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) is a non-profit organization dedicated to sharing the
knowledge of what a healthy
human diet really looks
like through education, research, and activism.
But it seems uninterested in players and their accomplishments, and with that lack of interest comes a lack of the
human touch necessary to make sense of the
knowledge it offers... The Witness is
like the island on which it takes place: a machine, to the core.
Patrick Goldstein, writing in the Los Angeles Times, argues that film critics
like Roger Ebert, sophisticated in their
knowledge of media presentation and
human behavior, make more insightful political pundits than the usual beltway - bubble spin - docs employed by television, radio, print and online outlets.
Besides, in this field of emotional understanding, the information can not even be passed away from one
human being to another, as it is possible more or less with the intellectual
knowledge (
like scientific
knowledge).
This translates as so much that is intuited, innate
human knowledge, pooh - poohed by science until science «discovers» it (
like the existence of telepathy), it's forced to live in the shadowland of people's minds.
While many people blame standardized testing for narrowing the elementary school curriculum to reading and math, the real culprit is «a longstanding pedagogical notion that the best way to teach kids reading comprehension is by giving them skills — strategies
like «finding the main idea — rather than instilling
knowledge about things
like the Civil War or
human biology.»
It's a longstanding pedagogical notion that the best way to teach kids reading comprehension is by giving them skills — strategies
like «finding the main idea» — rather than instilling
knowledge about things
like the Civil War or
human biology.
The book is about a character named Fiona and her «illustrated primer,» a machine designed to look
like a book but with links to all libraries, all TV shows, and all
human knowledge.
While other branches
like IT Management,
Human Resource Management, Project Management and Operations Management operate with a specific work in a business corporation; business management generally calls for the
knowledge in general.
In the same way as our
knowledge of things
like medicine,
human psychology and technology has changed dramatically in the last 75 years, so has our understanding of animal behaviour.
To Lewis»
knowledge, no other companies have created a network
like One Health's, nor have an eye to improving
human trials in the way the company does.
Sybren Renema's interest lies in all forms of
human knowledge - production, with a particular
liking for art, history, geographical exploration and the natural sciences.
historical baseline, whilst I am talking about a 2C rise above our current / the most recently calculated (2017) GAST which unarguably will take us into temperatures, weather and climate conditions that
humans have never before experienced... to the best of my
knowledge (though I seem to remember a line in one version of the bible that says something
like»..
The concept of a black swan may be a very useful metaphor to help discuss the issues involved in understanding the limits of
human knowledge, particularly when dealing with complex, chaotic systems
like the climate.
The real fantasists here are those
like CJ who imagine that they can stand judgment on 200 years of cumulative scientific
knowledge, by rubbishing all those men and women who have established the understanding we now have, including the scientific evidence for global warming resulting from
human activities that is now incontrovertible.
Going forward in order to provide legal value to disgruntled consumers and businesses that currently use
human lawyers, and solve the problem of the legally unrepresented, underserved and neglected, the answer lies in solutions
like LISA; a hybrid
human and machine system
knowledge engineered with reasoning, insight and judgment built in.
Artificial intelligence (AI) recognizes complex issues by reasoning about
knowledge,
like humans do.